Cargando…

Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaiser, Radek, Kantorová, Lucia, Langaufová, Alena, Slezáková, Simona, Tučková, Dagmar, Klugar, Miloslav, Klézl, Zdeněk, Barsa, Pavel, Cienciala, Jan, Hajdúk, Richard, Hrabálek, Lumír, Kučera, Roman, Netuka, David, Prýmek, Martin, Repko, Martin, Smrčka, Martin, Štulík, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-330158
_version_ 1785075908674060288
author Kaiser, Radek
Kantorová, Lucia
Langaufová, Alena
Slezáková, Simona
Tučková, Dagmar
Klugar, Miloslav
Klézl, Zdeněk
Barsa, Pavel
Cienciala, Jan
Hajdúk, Richard
Hrabálek, Lumír
Kučera, Roman
Netuka, David
Prýmek, Martin
Repko, Martin
Smrčka, Martin
Štulík, Jan
author_facet Kaiser, Radek
Kantorová, Lucia
Langaufová, Alena
Slezáková, Simona
Tučková, Dagmar
Klugar, Miloslav
Klézl, Zdeněk
Barsa, Pavel
Cienciala, Jan
Hajdúk, Richard
Hrabálek, Lumír
Kučera, Roman
Netuka, David
Prýmek, Martin
Repko, Martin
Smrčka, Martin
Štulík, Jan
author_sort Kaiser, Radek
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to May 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing decompression with instrumented fusion to decompression alone in patients with DS. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We provide the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment of the certainty of evidence (COE). RESULTS: We identified 4514 records and included four trials with 523 participants. At a 2-year follow-up, adding fusion to decompression likely results in trivial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (range 0–100, with higher values indicating greater impairment) with mean difference (MD) 0.86 (95% CI −4.53 to 6.26; moderate COE). Similar results were observed for back and leg pain measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more severe pain. There was a slightly increased improvement in back pain (2-year follow-up) in the group without fusion shown by MD −5·92 points (95% CI −11.00 to −0.84; moderate COE). There was a trivial difference in leg pain between the groups, slightly favouring the one without fusion, with MD −1.25 points (95% CI −6.71 to 4.21; moderate COE). Our findings at 2-year follow-up suggest that omitting fusion may increase the reoperation rate slightly (OR 1.23; 0.70 to 2.17; low COE). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests no benefits of adding instrumented fusion to decompression for treating DS. Isolated decompression seems sufficient for most patients. Further RCTs assessing spondylolisthesis stability are needed to determine which patients would benefit from fusion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022308267.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10359551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103595512023-07-22 Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials Kaiser, Radek Kantorová, Lucia Langaufová, Alena Slezáková, Simona Tučková, Dagmar Klugar, Miloslav Klézl, Zdeněk Barsa, Pavel Cienciala, Jan Hajdúk, Richard Hrabálek, Lumír Kučera, Roman Netuka, David Prýmek, Martin Repko, Martin Smrčka, Martin Štulík, Jan J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Neurosurgery OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to May 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing decompression with instrumented fusion to decompression alone in patients with DS. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We provide the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment of the certainty of evidence (COE). RESULTS: We identified 4514 records and included four trials with 523 participants. At a 2-year follow-up, adding fusion to decompression likely results in trivial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (range 0–100, with higher values indicating greater impairment) with mean difference (MD) 0.86 (95% CI −4.53 to 6.26; moderate COE). Similar results were observed for back and leg pain measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more severe pain. There was a slightly increased improvement in back pain (2-year follow-up) in the group without fusion shown by MD −5·92 points (95% CI −11.00 to −0.84; moderate COE). There was a trivial difference in leg pain between the groups, slightly favouring the one without fusion, with MD −1.25 points (95% CI −6.71 to 4.21; moderate COE). Our findings at 2-year follow-up suggest that omitting fusion may increase the reoperation rate slightly (OR 1.23; 0.70 to 2.17; low COE). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests no benefits of adding instrumented fusion to decompression for treating DS. Isolated decompression seems sufficient for most patients. Further RCTs assessing spondylolisthesis stability are needed to determine which patients would benefit from fusion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022308267. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10359551/ /pubmed/36849239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-330158 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Neurosurgery
Kaiser, Radek
Kantorová, Lucia
Langaufová, Alena
Slezáková, Simona
Tučková, Dagmar
Klugar, Miloslav
Klézl, Zdeněk
Barsa, Pavel
Cienciala, Jan
Hajdúk, Richard
Hrabálek, Lumír
Kučera, Roman
Netuka, David
Prýmek, Martin
Repko, Martin
Smrčka, Martin
Štulík, Jan
Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
title Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
title_full Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
title_fullStr Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
title_full_unstemmed Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
title_short Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
title_sort decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
topic Neurosurgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-330158
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiserradek decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT kantorovalucia decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT langaufovaalena decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT slezakovasimona decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT tuckovadagmar decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT klugarmiloslav decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT klezlzdenek decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT barsapavel decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT ciencialajan decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT hajdukrichard decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT hrabaleklumir decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT kuceraroman decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT netukadavid decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT prymekmartin decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT repkomartin decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT smrckamartin decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials
AT stulikjan decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials