Cargando…
Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-330158 |
_version_ | 1785075908674060288 |
---|---|
author | Kaiser, Radek Kantorová, Lucia Langaufová, Alena Slezáková, Simona Tučková, Dagmar Klugar, Miloslav Klézl, Zdeněk Barsa, Pavel Cienciala, Jan Hajdúk, Richard Hrabálek, Lumír Kučera, Roman Netuka, David Prýmek, Martin Repko, Martin Smrčka, Martin Štulík, Jan |
author_facet | Kaiser, Radek Kantorová, Lucia Langaufová, Alena Slezáková, Simona Tučková, Dagmar Klugar, Miloslav Klézl, Zdeněk Barsa, Pavel Cienciala, Jan Hajdúk, Richard Hrabálek, Lumír Kučera, Roman Netuka, David Prýmek, Martin Repko, Martin Smrčka, Martin Štulík, Jan |
author_sort | Kaiser, Radek |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to May 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing decompression with instrumented fusion to decompression alone in patients with DS. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We provide the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment of the certainty of evidence (COE). RESULTS: We identified 4514 records and included four trials with 523 participants. At a 2-year follow-up, adding fusion to decompression likely results in trivial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (range 0–100, with higher values indicating greater impairment) with mean difference (MD) 0.86 (95% CI −4.53 to 6.26; moderate COE). Similar results were observed for back and leg pain measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more severe pain. There was a slightly increased improvement in back pain (2-year follow-up) in the group without fusion shown by MD −5·92 points (95% CI −11.00 to −0.84; moderate COE). There was a trivial difference in leg pain between the groups, slightly favouring the one without fusion, with MD −1.25 points (95% CI −6.71 to 4.21; moderate COE). Our findings at 2-year follow-up suggest that omitting fusion may increase the reoperation rate slightly (OR 1.23; 0.70 to 2.17; low COE). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests no benefits of adding instrumented fusion to decompression for treating DS. Isolated decompression seems sufficient for most patients. Further RCTs assessing spondylolisthesis stability are needed to determine which patients would benefit from fusion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022308267. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10359551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103595512023-07-22 Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials Kaiser, Radek Kantorová, Lucia Langaufová, Alena Slezáková, Simona Tučková, Dagmar Klugar, Miloslav Klézl, Zdeněk Barsa, Pavel Cienciala, Jan Hajdúk, Richard Hrabálek, Lumír Kučera, Roman Netuka, David Prýmek, Martin Repko, Martin Smrčka, Martin Štulík, Jan J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Neurosurgery OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to May 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing decompression with instrumented fusion to decompression alone in patients with DS. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We provide the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment of the certainty of evidence (COE). RESULTS: We identified 4514 records and included four trials with 523 participants. At a 2-year follow-up, adding fusion to decompression likely results in trivial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (range 0–100, with higher values indicating greater impairment) with mean difference (MD) 0.86 (95% CI −4.53 to 6.26; moderate COE). Similar results were observed for back and leg pain measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more severe pain. There was a slightly increased improvement in back pain (2-year follow-up) in the group without fusion shown by MD −5·92 points (95% CI −11.00 to −0.84; moderate COE). There was a trivial difference in leg pain between the groups, slightly favouring the one without fusion, with MD −1.25 points (95% CI −6.71 to 4.21; moderate COE). Our findings at 2-year follow-up suggest that omitting fusion may increase the reoperation rate slightly (OR 1.23; 0.70 to 2.17; low COE). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests no benefits of adding instrumented fusion to decompression for treating DS. Isolated decompression seems sufficient for most patients. Further RCTs assessing spondylolisthesis stability are needed to determine which patients would benefit from fusion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022308267. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10359551/ /pubmed/36849239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-330158 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Neurosurgery Kaiser, Radek Kantorová, Lucia Langaufová, Alena Slezáková, Simona Tučková, Dagmar Klugar, Miloslav Klézl, Zdeněk Barsa, Pavel Cienciala, Jan Hajdúk, Richard Hrabálek, Lumír Kučera, Roman Netuka, David Prýmek, Martin Repko, Martin Smrčka, Martin Štulík, Jan Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials |
title | Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials |
title_full | Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials |
title_fullStr | Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials |
title_short | Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials |
title_sort | decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials |
topic | Neurosurgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2022-330158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaiserradek decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT kantorovalucia decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT langaufovaalena decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT slezakovasimona decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT tuckovadagmar decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT klugarmiloslav decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT klezlzdenek decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT barsapavel decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT ciencialajan decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT hajdukrichard decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT hrabaleklumir decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT kuceraroman decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT netukadavid decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT prymekmartin decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT repkomartin decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT smrckamartin decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials AT stulikjan decompressionaloneversusdecompressionwithinstrumentedfusioninthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativespondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedtrials |