Cargando…

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, can manage cerebellar ataxia (CA) by suppressing cerebral cortical excitability. Hence, this study aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of rTMS for CA patients by meta-analysis. METHODS: The P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Lianjun, Wang, Xiaoyu, Chen, Lianghua, Liu, Dandan, Li, Haihong, Liu, Zhaoxing, Huang, Yong, Chen, Junqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483443
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1177746
_version_ 1785076047227650048
author Yin, Lianjun
Wang, Xiaoyu
Chen, Lianghua
Liu, Dandan
Li, Haihong
Liu, Zhaoxing
Huang, Yong
Chen, Junqi
author_facet Yin, Lianjun
Wang, Xiaoyu
Chen, Lianghua
Liu, Dandan
Li, Haihong
Liu, Zhaoxing
Huang, Yong
Chen, Junqi
author_sort Yin, Lianjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, can manage cerebellar ataxia (CA) by suppressing cerebral cortical excitability. Hence, this study aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of rTMS for CA patients by meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible studies published till 20 May 2023. Weighted mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the effect of rTMS treatment. Additionally, the quality of the included studies and the risk of bias were evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. RESULTS: Overall, eight studies involving 278 CA patients were included in this meta-analysis. rTMS could significantly improve the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) (MD: −2.00; 95% CI: −3.97 to −0.02, p = 0.05), International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) (MD: −3.96; 95% CI: −5.51 to −2.40, p < 0.00001), Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG) (MD: −1.54; 95% CI: −2.24 to −0.84, p < 0.0001), 10-m walk test (10 MWT) (MD(10−m steps): −2.44; 95% CI: −4.14 to −0.73, p = 0.005), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (MD: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.15–4.03, p = 0.0004) as compared to sham stimulation. Active rTMS was not significantly different from sham rTMS in changing the duration (MD(10−m time): −1.29; 95% CI: −7.98 to 5.41, p = 0.71). No severe adverse events were observed in both sham stimulation and active rTMS groups. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides limited evidence that rTMS may be beneficial in treating CA patients. However, these findings should be treated with caution due to the limitations of the smaller sample size and the inconsistent approach and target of rTMS treatment. Therefore, more large-scale RCTs are required to further validate our analytical findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=295726, identifier: CRD42022295726.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10360185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103601852023-07-22 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yin, Lianjun Wang, Xiaoyu Chen, Lianghua Liu, Dandan Li, Haihong Liu, Zhaoxing Huang, Yong Chen, Junqi Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, can manage cerebellar ataxia (CA) by suppressing cerebral cortical excitability. Hence, this study aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of rTMS for CA patients by meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible studies published till 20 May 2023. Weighted mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the effect of rTMS treatment. Additionally, the quality of the included studies and the risk of bias were evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. RESULTS: Overall, eight studies involving 278 CA patients were included in this meta-analysis. rTMS could significantly improve the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) (MD: −2.00; 95% CI: −3.97 to −0.02, p = 0.05), International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) (MD: −3.96; 95% CI: −5.51 to −2.40, p < 0.00001), Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG) (MD: −1.54; 95% CI: −2.24 to −0.84, p < 0.0001), 10-m walk test (10 MWT) (MD(10−m steps): −2.44; 95% CI: −4.14 to −0.73, p = 0.005), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (MD: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.15–4.03, p = 0.0004) as compared to sham stimulation. Active rTMS was not significantly different from sham rTMS in changing the duration (MD(10−m time): −1.29; 95% CI: −7.98 to 5.41, p = 0.71). No severe adverse events were observed in both sham stimulation and active rTMS groups. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides limited evidence that rTMS may be beneficial in treating CA patients. However, these findings should be treated with caution due to the limitations of the smaller sample size and the inconsistent approach and target of rTMS treatment. Therefore, more large-scale RCTs are required to further validate our analytical findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=295726, identifier: CRD42022295726. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10360185/ /pubmed/37483443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1177746 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yin, Wang, Chen, Liu, Li, Liu, Huang and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Yin, Lianjun
Wang, Xiaoyu
Chen, Lianghua
Liu, Dandan
Li, Haihong
Liu, Zhaoxing
Huang, Yong
Chen, Junqi
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483443
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1177746
work_keys_str_mv AT yinlianjun repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxiaoyu repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenlianghua repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liudandan repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihaihong repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuzhaoxing repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangyong repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjunqi repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis