Cargando…
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, can manage cerebellar ataxia (CA) by suppressing cerebral cortical excitability. Hence, this study aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of rTMS for CA patients by meta-analysis. METHODS: The P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1177746 |
_version_ | 1785076047227650048 |
---|---|
author | Yin, Lianjun Wang, Xiaoyu Chen, Lianghua Liu, Dandan Li, Haihong Liu, Zhaoxing Huang, Yong Chen, Junqi |
author_facet | Yin, Lianjun Wang, Xiaoyu Chen, Lianghua Liu, Dandan Li, Haihong Liu, Zhaoxing Huang, Yong Chen, Junqi |
author_sort | Yin, Lianjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, can manage cerebellar ataxia (CA) by suppressing cerebral cortical excitability. Hence, this study aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of rTMS for CA patients by meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible studies published till 20 May 2023. Weighted mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the effect of rTMS treatment. Additionally, the quality of the included studies and the risk of bias were evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. RESULTS: Overall, eight studies involving 278 CA patients were included in this meta-analysis. rTMS could significantly improve the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) (MD: −2.00; 95% CI: −3.97 to −0.02, p = 0.05), International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) (MD: −3.96; 95% CI: −5.51 to −2.40, p < 0.00001), Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG) (MD: −1.54; 95% CI: −2.24 to −0.84, p < 0.0001), 10-m walk test (10 MWT) (MD(10−m steps): −2.44; 95% CI: −4.14 to −0.73, p = 0.005), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (MD: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.15–4.03, p = 0.0004) as compared to sham stimulation. Active rTMS was not significantly different from sham rTMS in changing the duration (MD(10−m time): −1.29; 95% CI: −7.98 to 5.41, p = 0.71). No severe adverse events were observed in both sham stimulation and active rTMS groups. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides limited evidence that rTMS may be beneficial in treating CA patients. However, these findings should be treated with caution due to the limitations of the smaller sample size and the inconsistent approach and target of rTMS treatment. Therefore, more large-scale RCTs are required to further validate our analytical findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=295726, identifier: CRD42022295726. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10360185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103601852023-07-22 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yin, Lianjun Wang, Xiaoyu Chen, Lianghua Liu, Dandan Li, Haihong Liu, Zhaoxing Huang, Yong Chen, Junqi Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, can manage cerebellar ataxia (CA) by suppressing cerebral cortical excitability. Hence, this study aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of rTMS for CA patients by meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible studies published till 20 May 2023. Weighted mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the effect of rTMS treatment. Additionally, the quality of the included studies and the risk of bias were evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. RESULTS: Overall, eight studies involving 278 CA patients were included in this meta-analysis. rTMS could significantly improve the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) (MD: −2.00; 95% CI: −3.97 to −0.02, p = 0.05), International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) (MD: −3.96; 95% CI: −5.51 to −2.40, p < 0.00001), Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG) (MD: −1.54; 95% CI: −2.24 to −0.84, p < 0.0001), 10-m walk test (10 MWT) (MD(10−m steps): −2.44; 95% CI: −4.14 to −0.73, p = 0.005), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (MD: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.15–4.03, p = 0.0004) as compared to sham stimulation. Active rTMS was not significantly different from sham rTMS in changing the duration (MD(10−m time): −1.29; 95% CI: −7.98 to 5.41, p = 0.71). No severe adverse events were observed in both sham stimulation and active rTMS groups. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides limited evidence that rTMS may be beneficial in treating CA patients. However, these findings should be treated with caution due to the limitations of the smaller sample size and the inconsistent approach and target of rTMS treatment. Therefore, more large-scale RCTs are required to further validate our analytical findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=295726, identifier: CRD42022295726. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10360185/ /pubmed/37483443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1177746 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yin, Wang, Chen, Liu, Li, Liu, Huang and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Yin, Lianjun Wang, Xiaoyu Chen, Lianghua Liu, Dandan Li, Haihong Liu, Zhaoxing Huang, Yong Chen, Junqi Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1177746 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yinlianjun repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangxiaoyu repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenlianghua repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liudandan repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lihaihong repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuzhaoxing repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huangyong repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenjunqi repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforcerebellarataxiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |