Cargando…

Evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach for treating thoracic disc herniation. METHODS: We searched three databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase for eligible studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamid, Shafi, Moradi, Farid, Bagheri, Seyed Reza, Zarpoosh, Mahsa, Amirian, Parsa, Ghasemi, Hooman, Alimohammadi, Ehsan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37475044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04016-9
_version_ 1785076059369111552
author Hamid, Shafi
Moradi, Farid
Bagheri, Seyed Reza
Zarpoosh, Mahsa
Amirian, Parsa
Ghasemi, Hooman
Alimohammadi, Ehsan
author_facet Hamid, Shafi
Moradi, Farid
Bagheri, Seyed Reza
Zarpoosh, Mahsa
Amirian, Parsa
Ghasemi, Hooman
Alimohammadi, Ehsan
author_sort Hamid, Shafi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach for treating thoracic disc herniation. METHODS: We searched three databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase for eligible studies until Dec 2022. The quality of studies and their risk of bias were assessed using the methodological index for non‐randomized studies. We evaluated the heterogeneity between studies using the I(2) statistic and the P-value for the heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients described in 11 included articles were published from 2009 to 2022. Pain outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS score) were reported in four studies. The standardized mean difference was reported as 0.749 (CI 95% 0.555–0.943). The obtained result showed the positive effect of the procedure and the improvement of patients' pain after the surgery. Myelopathy outcomes using the Nurick score were reported in five studies. The standardized mean difference was reported as 0.775 (CI 95% 0.479–1.071). The result showed the positive effect of the procedure. Eight studies assessed postoperative complications and neurological deterioration. The pooled overall complication was 12.4% (32/258) and 3.5% (9/258) neurological worsening. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated a positive effect of the transfacet pedicle-sparing approach on the clinical outcomes of patients with thoracic disc herniation surgery. The technique has been shown to be safe and effective for the right patient. The technique is associated with lower rates of complications and a shorter hospital stay compared to other surgical approaches. This information can assist clinicians in making informed decisions when selecting the most appropriate surgical technique for their patients with thoracic disc herniation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10360238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103602382023-07-22 Evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hamid, Shafi Moradi, Farid Bagheri, Seyed Reza Zarpoosh, Mahsa Amirian, Parsa Ghasemi, Hooman Alimohammadi, Ehsan J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach for treating thoracic disc herniation. METHODS: We searched three databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase for eligible studies until Dec 2022. The quality of studies and their risk of bias were assessed using the methodological index for non‐randomized studies. We evaluated the heterogeneity between studies using the I(2) statistic and the P-value for the heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients described in 11 included articles were published from 2009 to 2022. Pain outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS score) were reported in four studies. The standardized mean difference was reported as 0.749 (CI 95% 0.555–0.943). The obtained result showed the positive effect of the procedure and the improvement of patients' pain after the surgery. Myelopathy outcomes using the Nurick score were reported in five studies. The standardized mean difference was reported as 0.775 (CI 95% 0.479–1.071). The result showed the positive effect of the procedure. Eight studies assessed postoperative complications and neurological deterioration. The pooled overall complication was 12.4% (32/258) and 3.5% (9/258) neurological worsening. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated a positive effect of the transfacet pedicle-sparing approach on the clinical outcomes of patients with thoracic disc herniation surgery. The technique has been shown to be safe and effective for the right patient. The technique is associated with lower rates of complications and a shorter hospital stay compared to other surgical approaches. This information can assist clinicians in making informed decisions when selecting the most appropriate surgical technique for their patients with thoracic disc herniation. BioMed Central 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10360238/ /pubmed/37475044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04016-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Hamid, Shafi
Moradi, Farid
Bagheri, Seyed Reza
Zarpoosh, Mahsa
Amirian, Parsa
Ghasemi, Hooman
Alimohammadi, Ehsan
Evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37475044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04016-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidshafi evaluationofclinicaloutcomescomplicationratefeasibilityandapplicabilityoftransfacetpediclesparingapproachinthoracicdischerniationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moradifarid evaluationofclinicaloutcomescomplicationratefeasibilityandapplicabilityoftransfacetpediclesparingapproachinthoracicdischerniationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bagheriseyedreza evaluationofclinicaloutcomescomplicationratefeasibilityandapplicabilityoftransfacetpediclesparingapproachinthoracicdischerniationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zarpooshmahsa evaluationofclinicaloutcomescomplicationratefeasibilityandapplicabilityoftransfacetpediclesparingapproachinthoracicdischerniationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT amirianparsa evaluationofclinicaloutcomescomplicationratefeasibilityandapplicabilityoftransfacetpediclesparingapproachinthoracicdischerniationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ghasemihooman evaluationofclinicaloutcomescomplicationratefeasibilityandapplicabilityoftransfacetpediclesparingapproachinthoracicdischerniationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alimohammadiehsan evaluationofclinicaloutcomescomplicationratefeasibilityandapplicabilityoftransfacetpediclesparingapproachinthoracicdischerniationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis