Cargando…

Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare

Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care. OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webb, Rebecca, Uddin, Nazihah, Constantinou, Georgina, Ford, Elizabeth, Easter, Abigail, Shakespeare, Judy, Hann, Agnes, Roberts, Nia, Alderdice, Fiona, Sinesi, Andrea, Coates, Rose, Hogg, Sally, Ayers, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703
_version_ 1785076101487263744
author Webb, Rebecca
Uddin, Nazihah
Constantinou, Georgina
Ford, Elizabeth
Easter, Abigail
Shakespeare, Judy
Hann, Agnes
Roberts, Nia
Alderdice, Fiona
Sinesi, Andrea
Coates, Rose
Hogg, Sally
Ayers, Susan
author_facet Webb, Rebecca
Uddin, Nazihah
Constantinou, Georgina
Ford, Elizabeth
Easter, Abigail
Shakespeare, Judy
Hann, Agnes
Roberts, Nia
Alderdice, Fiona
Sinesi, Andrea
Coates, Rose
Hogg, Sally
Ayers, Susan
author_sort Webb, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care. OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and facilitators to women to seeking help, accessing help, and engaging in PMH care, and to suggest recommendations for clinical practice and policy. DESIGN: A meta-review of systematic reviews. REVIEW METHODS: Seven databases were searched and reviewed using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses search strategy. Studies that focused on the views of women seeking help and accessing PMH care were included. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 was used to assess review methodology. To improve validity of results, a qualitative sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess whether themes remained consistent across all reviews, regardless of their quality rating. RESULTS: A total of 32 reviews were included. A wide range of barriers and facilitators to women accessing PMH care were identified. These mapped across a multilevel model of influential factors (individual, healthcare professional, interpersonal, organisational, political and societal) and across the care pathway (from decision to consult to receiving care). Evidence-based recommendations to support the design and delivery of PMH care were produced based on identified barriers and facilitators. CONCLUSION: The identified barriers and facilitators point to a complex interplay of many factors, highlighting the need for an international effort to increase awareness of PMH problems, reduce mental health stigma, and provide woman-centred, flexible care, delivered by well trained and culturally sensitive primary care, maternity, and psychiatric health professionals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142854.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10360426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103604262023-07-22 Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare Webb, Rebecca Uddin, Nazihah Constantinou, Georgina Ford, Elizabeth Easter, Abigail Shakespeare, Judy Hann, Agnes Roberts, Nia Alderdice, Fiona Sinesi, Andrea Coates, Rose Hogg, Sally Ayers, Susan BMJ Open Mental Health Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care. OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and facilitators to women to seeking help, accessing help, and engaging in PMH care, and to suggest recommendations for clinical practice and policy. DESIGN: A meta-review of systematic reviews. REVIEW METHODS: Seven databases were searched and reviewed using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses search strategy. Studies that focused on the views of women seeking help and accessing PMH care were included. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 was used to assess review methodology. To improve validity of results, a qualitative sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess whether themes remained consistent across all reviews, regardless of their quality rating. RESULTS: A total of 32 reviews were included. A wide range of barriers and facilitators to women accessing PMH care were identified. These mapped across a multilevel model of influential factors (individual, healthcare professional, interpersonal, organisational, political and societal) and across the care pathway (from decision to consult to receiving care). Evidence-based recommendations to support the design and delivery of PMH care were produced based on identified barriers and facilitators. CONCLUSION: The identified barriers and facilitators point to a complex interplay of many factors, highlighting the need for an international effort to increase awareness of PMH problems, reduce mental health stigma, and provide woman-centred, flexible care, delivered by well trained and culturally sensitive primary care, maternity, and psychiatric health professionals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142854. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10360426/ /pubmed/37474171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Webb, Rebecca
Uddin, Nazihah
Constantinou, Georgina
Ford, Elizabeth
Easter, Abigail
Shakespeare, Judy
Hann, Agnes
Roberts, Nia
Alderdice, Fiona
Sinesi, Andrea
Coates, Rose
Hogg, Sally
Ayers, Susan
Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title_full Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title_fullStr Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title_short Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title_sort meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703
work_keys_str_mv AT webbrebecca metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT uddinnazihah metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT constantinougeorgina metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT fordelizabeth metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT easterabigail metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT shakespearejudy metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT hannagnes metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT robertsnia metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT alderdicefiona metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT sinesiandrea metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT coatesrose metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT hoggsally metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT ayerssusan metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare