Cargando…
Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care. OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703 |
_version_ | 1785076101487263744 |
---|---|
author | Webb, Rebecca Uddin, Nazihah Constantinou, Georgina Ford, Elizabeth Easter, Abigail Shakespeare, Judy Hann, Agnes Roberts, Nia Alderdice, Fiona Sinesi, Andrea Coates, Rose Hogg, Sally Ayers, Susan |
author_facet | Webb, Rebecca Uddin, Nazihah Constantinou, Georgina Ford, Elizabeth Easter, Abigail Shakespeare, Judy Hann, Agnes Roberts, Nia Alderdice, Fiona Sinesi, Andrea Coates, Rose Hogg, Sally Ayers, Susan |
author_sort | Webb, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care. OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and facilitators to women to seeking help, accessing help, and engaging in PMH care, and to suggest recommendations for clinical practice and policy. DESIGN: A meta-review of systematic reviews. REVIEW METHODS: Seven databases were searched and reviewed using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses search strategy. Studies that focused on the views of women seeking help and accessing PMH care were included. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 was used to assess review methodology. To improve validity of results, a qualitative sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess whether themes remained consistent across all reviews, regardless of their quality rating. RESULTS: A total of 32 reviews were included. A wide range of barriers and facilitators to women accessing PMH care were identified. These mapped across a multilevel model of influential factors (individual, healthcare professional, interpersonal, organisational, political and societal) and across the care pathway (from decision to consult to receiving care). Evidence-based recommendations to support the design and delivery of PMH care were produced based on identified barriers and facilitators. CONCLUSION: The identified barriers and facilitators point to a complex interplay of many factors, highlighting the need for an international effort to increase awareness of PMH problems, reduce mental health stigma, and provide woman-centred, flexible care, delivered by well trained and culturally sensitive primary care, maternity, and psychiatric health professionals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142854. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10360426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103604262023-07-22 Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare Webb, Rebecca Uddin, Nazihah Constantinou, Georgina Ford, Elizabeth Easter, Abigail Shakespeare, Judy Hann, Agnes Roberts, Nia Alderdice, Fiona Sinesi, Andrea Coates, Rose Hogg, Sally Ayers, Susan BMJ Open Mental Health Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care. OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and facilitators to women to seeking help, accessing help, and engaging in PMH care, and to suggest recommendations for clinical practice and policy. DESIGN: A meta-review of systematic reviews. REVIEW METHODS: Seven databases were searched and reviewed using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses search strategy. Studies that focused on the views of women seeking help and accessing PMH care were included. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 was used to assess review methodology. To improve validity of results, a qualitative sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess whether themes remained consistent across all reviews, regardless of their quality rating. RESULTS: A total of 32 reviews were included. A wide range of barriers and facilitators to women accessing PMH care were identified. These mapped across a multilevel model of influential factors (individual, healthcare professional, interpersonal, organisational, political and societal) and across the care pathway (from decision to consult to receiving care). Evidence-based recommendations to support the design and delivery of PMH care were produced based on identified barriers and facilitators. CONCLUSION: The identified barriers and facilitators point to a complex interplay of many factors, highlighting the need for an international effort to increase awareness of PMH problems, reduce mental health stigma, and provide woman-centred, flexible care, delivered by well trained and culturally sensitive primary care, maternity, and psychiatric health professionals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142854. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10360426/ /pubmed/37474171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Webb, Rebecca Uddin, Nazihah Constantinou, Georgina Ford, Elizabeth Easter, Abigail Shakespeare, Judy Hann, Agnes Roberts, Nia Alderdice, Fiona Sinesi, Andrea Coates, Rose Hogg, Sally Ayers, Susan Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare |
title | Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare |
title_full | Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare |
title_fullStr | Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare |
title_short | Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare |
title_sort | meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT webbrebecca metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT uddinnazihah metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT constantinougeorgina metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT fordelizabeth metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT easterabigail metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT shakespearejudy metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT hannagnes metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT robertsnia metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT alderdicefiona metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT sinesiandrea metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT coatesrose metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT hoggsally metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT ayerssusan metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare AT metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare |