Cargando…
Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging
This study proposed to investigate the optimal selection of b-values in diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing malignant from benign mediastinal lymph nodes. Diffusion-weighted imaging with six b-values was performed on 35 patients at 1.5 T. Image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio, and rel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16702 |
_version_ | 1785076108028280832 |
---|---|
author | Qi, Li-Ping Zhong, Zheng Sun, Ying-Shi Li, Xiao-Ting Tang, Lei Zhou, Xiaohong Joe |
author_facet | Qi, Li-Ping Zhong, Zheng Sun, Ying-Shi Li, Xiao-Ting Tang, Lei Zhou, Xiaohong Joe |
author_sort | Qi, Li-Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study proposed to investigate the optimal selection of b-values in diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing malignant from benign mediastinal lymph nodes. Diffusion-weighted imaging with six b-values was performed on 35 patients at 1.5 T. Image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative contrast ratio of lymph node to chest muscle were compared between the diffusion-weighted images with a b-value up to 800 and 1000 s/mm(2). Using a lower and an upper b-value in the range of 0–1000 s/mm(2), eight apparent diffusion coefficient maps were obtained from a mono-exponential model. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to evaluate the performance of the apparent diffusion coefficients for distinguishing malignant from benign mediastinal lymph nodes by using the area under the curve as a criterion. The mean image quality score and the relative contrast ratio showed no difference between b-values of 800 and 1000 s/mm(2). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the areas under the curve of apparent diffusion coefficient with b-value pairs of (0, 800), (0, 1000), and (50, 800) s/mm(2) were significantly higher than those from the other b-value pairs. No significant difference was observed among the three b-value pairs. Apparent diffusion coefficient obtained from b-value pairs of (0, 800), (0, 1000), and (50, 800) s/mm(2) showed superior diagnostic performance compared to the other b-value combinations. Based on several practical considerations, the b-value pair of (50, 800) s/mm(2) is recommended for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10360569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103605692023-07-22 Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging Qi, Li-Ping Zhong, Zheng Sun, Ying-Shi Li, Xiao-Ting Tang, Lei Zhou, Xiaohong Joe Heliyon Research Article This study proposed to investigate the optimal selection of b-values in diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing malignant from benign mediastinal lymph nodes. Diffusion-weighted imaging with six b-values was performed on 35 patients at 1.5 T. Image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative contrast ratio of lymph node to chest muscle were compared between the diffusion-weighted images with a b-value up to 800 and 1000 s/mm(2). Using a lower and an upper b-value in the range of 0–1000 s/mm(2), eight apparent diffusion coefficient maps were obtained from a mono-exponential model. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to evaluate the performance of the apparent diffusion coefficients for distinguishing malignant from benign mediastinal lymph nodes by using the area under the curve as a criterion. The mean image quality score and the relative contrast ratio showed no difference between b-values of 800 and 1000 s/mm(2). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the areas under the curve of apparent diffusion coefficient with b-value pairs of (0, 800), (0, 1000), and (50, 800) s/mm(2) were significantly higher than those from the other b-value pairs. No significant difference was observed among the three b-value pairs. Apparent diffusion coefficient obtained from b-value pairs of (0, 800), (0, 1000), and (50, 800) s/mm(2) showed superior diagnostic performance compared to the other b-value combinations. Based on several practical considerations, the b-value pair of (50, 800) s/mm(2) is recommended for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes. Elsevier 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10360569/ /pubmed/37484276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16702 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Qi, Li-Ping Zhong, Zheng Sun, Ying-Shi Li, Xiao-Ting Tang, Lei Zhou, Xiaohong Joe Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging |
title | Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging |
title_full | Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging |
title_fullStr | Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging |
title_short | Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging |
title_sort | optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiliping optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT zhongzheng optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT sunyingshi optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT lixiaoting optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT tanglei optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT zhouxiaohongjoe optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging |