Cargando…

Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging

This study proposed to investigate the optimal selection of b-values in diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing malignant from benign mediastinal lymph nodes. Diffusion-weighted imaging with six b-values was performed on 35 patients at 1.5 T. Image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio, and rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Li-Ping, Zhong, Zheng, Sun, Ying-Shi, Li, Xiao-Ting, Tang, Lei, Zhou, Xiaohong Joe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16702
_version_ 1785076108028280832
author Qi, Li-Ping
Zhong, Zheng
Sun, Ying-Shi
Li, Xiao-Ting
Tang, Lei
Zhou, Xiaohong Joe
author_facet Qi, Li-Ping
Zhong, Zheng
Sun, Ying-Shi
Li, Xiao-Ting
Tang, Lei
Zhou, Xiaohong Joe
author_sort Qi, Li-Ping
collection PubMed
description This study proposed to investigate the optimal selection of b-values in diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing malignant from benign mediastinal lymph nodes. Diffusion-weighted imaging with six b-values was performed on 35 patients at 1.5 T. Image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative contrast ratio of lymph node to chest muscle were compared between the diffusion-weighted images with a b-value up to 800 and 1000 s/mm(2). Using a lower and an upper b-value in the range of 0–1000 s/mm(2), eight apparent diffusion coefficient maps were obtained from a mono-exponential model. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to evaluate the performance of the apparent diffusion coefficients for distinguishing malignant from benign mediastinal lymph nodes by using the area under the curve as a criterion. The mean image quality score and the relative contrast ratio showed no difference between b-values of 800 and 1000 s/mm(2). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the areas under the curve of apparent diffusion coefficient with b-value pairs of (0, 800), (0, 1000), and (50, 800) s/mm(2) were significantly higher than those from the other b-value pairs. No significant difference was observed among the three b-value pairs. Apparent diffusion coefficient obtained from b-value pairs of (0, 800), (0, 1000), and (50, 800) s/mm(2) showed superior diagnostic performance compared to the other b-value combinations. Based on several practical considerations, the b-value pair of (50, 800) s/mm(2) is recommended for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10360569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103605692023-07-22 Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging Qi, Li-Ping Zhong, Zheng Sun, Ying-Shi Li, Xiao-Ting Tang, Lei Zhou, Xiaohong Joe Heliyon Research Article This study proposed to investigate the optimal selection of b-values in diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing malignant from benign mediastinal lymph nodes. Diffusion-weighted imaging with six b-values was performed on 35 patients at 1.5 T. Image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative contrast ratio of lymph node to chest muscle were compared between the diffusion-weighted images with a b-value up to 800 and 1000 s/mm(2). Using a lower and an upper b-value in the range of 0–1000 s/mm(2), eight apparent diffusion coefficient maps were obtained from a mono-exponential model. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to evaluate the performance of the apparent diffusion coefficients for distinguishing malignant from benign mediastinal lymph nodes by using the area under the curve as a criterion. The mean image quality score and the relative contrast ratio showed no difference between b-values of 800 and 1000 s/mm(2). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the areas under the curve of apparent diffusion coefficient with b-value pairs of (0, 800), (0, 1000), and (50, 800) s/mm(2) were significantly higher than those from the other b-value pairs. No significant difference was observed among the three b-value pairs. Apparent diffusion coefficient obtained from b-value pairs of (0, 800), (0, 1000), and (50, 800) s/mm(2) showed superior diagnostic performance compared to the other b-value combinations. Based on several practical considerations, the b-value pair of (50, 800) s/mm(2) is recommended for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes. Elsevier 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10360569/ /pubmed/37484276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16702 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Qi, Li-Ping
Zhong, Zheng
Sun, Ying-Shi
Li, Xiao-Ting
Tang, Lei
Zhou, Xiaohong Joe
Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging
title Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging
title_full Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging
title_fullStr Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging
title_full_unstemmed Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging
title_short Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging
title_sort optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10360569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16702
work_keys_str_mv AT qiliping optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT zhongzheng optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT sunyingshi optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT lixiaoting optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT tanglei optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT zhouxiaohongjoe optimalselectionofbvaluesfordifferentialdiagnosisofmediastinallymphnodesusingdiffusionweightedimaging