Cargando…

A clinical study to evaluate the reliability of light-correcting devices in clinical shade selection

BACKGROUND: Visual and advanced instrumental methods are the most common tools for shade selection. The instrumental methods are considered reliable and provide quantifiable values, but the high cost puts them out of the reach of most dentists. Light-correcting devices provide an economical alternat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurian, Nirmal, Varghese, Vinaya Susan, Sudharson, Nishanth A, Wadhwa, Samiksha, Narang, Chitvan, Sethi, Nivea, Singh, Irina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483899
_version_ 1785076180850835456
author Kurian, Nirmal
Varghese, Vinaya Susan
Sudharson, Nishanth A
Wadhwa, Samiksha
Narang, Chitvan
Sethi, Nivea
Singh, Irina
author_facet Kurian, Nirmal
Varghese, Vinaya Susan
Sudharson, Nishanth A
Wadhwa, Samiksha
Narang, Chitvan
Sethi, Nivea
Singh, Irina
author_sort Kurian, Nirmal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Visual and advanced instrumental methods are the most common tools for shade selection. The instrumental methods are considered reliable and provide quantifiable values, but the high cost puts them out of the reach of most dentists. Light-correcting devices provide an economical alternative for clinical shade selection. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the light-correcting device in clinical shade selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The in vivo experimental prospective study sample included 60 volunteers aged 18–25 years, with no severe enamel pigmentation or anomaly in anterior maxillary teeth. Two observers performed visual shade matching of the maxillary right central incisor without a light-correcting device and later with a light-correcting device at the same time of the day at an interval of 1 week. The shades were confirmed with the control value obtained by using a spectrophotometer. Each observer was blinded to the shade color selected by the other examiner. The data collected were subjected to the statistical analysis. The shade measured with the light-correcting device and without its use was compared with the control shade obtained by the spectrophotometer. The value closer to the control shade value was considered accurate, and the method used for shade matching would be considered reliable. The Fleiss kappa statistical test was used to assess the reliability of each method. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Using a light-correcting device significantly increased the reliability of the visual shade selection method. When compared to the shades recorded by the spectrophotometer (control), the use of a light-correcting device as an aid in visual shade selection showed more accurate and reliable results as compared to the visual shade selection without a light-correcting device (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Light-correcting devices can assist in reliable shade selection and allow better communication with the dental laboratory technician to provide predictable esthetic results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10361268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103612682023-07-22 A clinical study to evaluate the reliability of light-correcting devices in clinical shade selection Kurian, Nirmal Varghese, Vinaya Susan Sudharson, Nishanth A Wadhwa, Samiksha Narang, Chitvan Sethi, Nivea Singh, Irina Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Visual and advanced instrumental methods are the most common tools for shade selection. The instrumental methods are considered reliable and provide quantifiable values, but the high cost puts them out of the reach of most dentists. Light-correcting devices provide an economical alternative for clinical shade selection. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the light-correcting device in clinical shade selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The in vivo experimental prospective study sample included 60 volunteers aged 18–25 years, with no severe enamel pigmentation or anomaly in anterior maxillary teeth. Two observers performed visual shade matching of the maxillary right central incisor without a light-correcting device and later with a light-correcting device at the same time of the day at an interval of 1 week. The shades were confirmed with the control value obtained by using a spectrophotometer. Each observer was blinded to the shade color selected by the other examiner. The data collected were subjected to the statistical analysis. The shade measured with the light-correcting device and without its use was compared with the control shade obtained by the spectrophotometer. The value closer to the control shade value was considered accurate, and the method used for shade matching would be considered reliable. The Fleiss kappa statistical test was used to assess the reliability of each method. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Using a light-correcting device significantly increased the reliability of the visual shade selection method. When compared to the shades recorded by the spectrophotometer (control), the use of a light-correcting device as an aid in visual shade selection showed more accurate and reliable results as compared to the visual shade selection without a light-correcting device (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Light-correcting devices can assist in reliable shade selection and allow better communication with the dental laboratory technician to provide predictable esthetic results. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10361268/ /pubmed/37483899 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kurian, Nirmal
Varghese, Vinaya Susan
Sudharson, Nishanth A
Wadhwa, Samiksha
Narang, Chitvan
Sethi, Nivea
Singh, Irina
A clinical study to evaluate the reliability of light-correcting devices in clinical shade selection
title A clinical study to evaluate the reliability of light-correcting devices in clinical shade selection
title_full A clinical study to evaluate the reliability of light-correcting devices in clinical shade selection
title_fullStr A clinical study to evaluate the reliability of light-correcting devices in clinical shade selection
title_full_unstemmed A clinical study to evaluate the reliability of light-correcting devices in clinical shade selection
title_short A clinical study to evaluate the reliability of light-correcting devices in clinical shade selection
title_sort clinical study to evaluate the reliability of light-correcting devices in clinical shade selection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483899
work_keys_str_mv AT kuriannirmal aclinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT varghesevinayasusan aclinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT sudharsonnishantha aclinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT wadhwasamiksha aclinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT narangchitvan aclinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT sethinivea aclinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT singhirina aclinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT kuriannirmal clinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT varghesevinayasusan clinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT sudharsonnishantha clinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT wadhwasamiksha clinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT narangchitvan clinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT sethinivea clinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection
AT singhirina clinicalstudytoevaluatethereliabilityoflightcorrectingdevicesinclinicalshadeselection