Portable thermal scanners to detect and monitor small endotherms: A comparative assessment of available equipment to guide practitioners

Detection is essential to studying and monitoring wild animals; however, detection is challenging for small endotherms that are nocturnal or best detected at night. Techniques such as trapping or spotlighting disturb focal species, and the effectiveness of spotlighting can be limited for cryptic species, resulting in low detection rates that hinder our ability to monitor and study some endotherms at night. Thermal scanners detect infrared wavelengths not otherwise visible to humans. With improvements in equipment size and cost, thermal scanners have emerged as a valuable tool for passive detection of endotherms. Here we seek to provide objective guidance on thermal tool selection to practitioners who wish to adopt such tools to detect and monitor small endotherms. We compared the efficacy of three handheld thermal scanners (of varying resolutions) and a traditional spotlight for detecting small, cryptic endotherms at night. Random arrays of artificially heated small bird models (representing small, cryptic endotherms) were established along transects in native grasslands that support a range of small threatened endotherms, including the Critically Endangered Plains‐wanderer (Pedionomus torquatus). Transects were independently surveyed by five observers, blind to model locations and model density. Performance measures representing detection capability were assessed for all devices, and usability of each device was assessed with a survey completed by all observers. Detection rates, detection distances, and survey accuracy were greater for thermal scanners with resolutions of 320 × 240 and 640 × 480 than for the spotlight. A low‐resolution thermal scope (160 × 120) performed poorly for all performance measures. There was a consensus among users that a video camera‐style thermal scanner was most comfortable to hold and view while traversing the transect, as opposed to thermal scopes where users look directly through the lens. These results suggest that high‐resolution thermal scanners (≥320 × 240) provide improved detection capabilities compared to traditional spotlights. Higher detection rates provide opportunities for detecting and monitoring small endotherms at night where this was once difficult or impossible.