Cargando…

The Effect of Expert Patient Simulation on Clinical Judgment: A Quasi-Experimental Study

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, quality education is one of the important tools to improve healthcare quality. Healthcare practitioners must be competent in their clinical judgement to meet clients’ need. However, poor clinical judgment skill accounts for almost one-third of all patient problems in health ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shinde, Sanjay, Tiruneh, Firew, Fufa, Dinaol Abdissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483524
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S402610
_version_ 1785076220280438784
author Shinde, Sanjay
Tiruneh, Firew
Fufa, Dinaol Abdissa
author_facet Shinde, Sanjay
Tiruneh, Firew
Fufa, Dinaol Abdissa
author_sort Shinde, Sanjay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Worldwide, quality education is one of the important tools to improve healthcare quality. Healthcare practitioners must be competent in their clinical judgement to meet clients’ need. However, poor clinical judgment skill accounts for almost one-third of all patient problems in health care. Expert patient simulation has been used as a training method for clinical judgement skill. However, according to empirical studies, using expert patients to develop clinical judgement skill is unclear. The method is effective in one situation but not in another. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of expert patient simulation on the clinical judgment skill of health science students of Mizan-Tepi University. METHODS: A pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental design was used on 92 randomly selected samples from the graduating cohort of midwifery students. The research subjects who took part in the experiment were picked at random. Tools included the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (C-CEI(®)), the Learning Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Questionnaire, and the Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI). The Wilcoxon-signed rank test was utilized to compare the self-confidence scores among intervention and control group of students, and the paired sample test was used to compare clinical judgment scores. Cohen’s d was used to assess the effect size, and Spearman correlation was used to explore the association. RESULTS: Clinical decision-making ability and self-confidence measures revealed statistical and practical differences between before and after simulation. There was a mean difference of 2.28 (95% CI, 1.78, 2.79), t (45)=9.13, p 0.001, and an effect size of 1.3, p 0.001. A pre-and post-simulation self-confidence measure showed statistically significant improvement after simulation (W = 1, Z = −3.57, P 0.001). A moderately significant positive connection (r = 0.419, p 0.004) was also discovered. CONCLUSION: The study found that human expert patient simulation is a tremendous clinical training technique for improving students’ clinical decision-making skill competency and self-confidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10361458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103614582023-07-22 The Effect of Expert Patient Simulation on Clinical Judgment: A Quasi-Experimental Study Shinde, Sanjay Tiruneh, Firew Fufa, Dinaol Abdissa Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: Worldwide, quality education is one of the important tools to improve healthcare quality. Healthcare practitioners must be competent in their clinical judgement to meet clients’ need. However, poor clinical judgment skill accounts for almost one-third of all patient problems in health care. Expert patient simulation has been used as a training method for clinical judgement skill. However, according to empirical studies, using expert patients to develop clinical judgement skill is unclear. The method is effective in one situation but not in another. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of expert patient simulation on the clinical judgment skill of health science students of Mizan-Tepi University. METHODS: A pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental design was used on 92 randomly selected samples from the graduating cohort of midwifery students. The research subjects who took part in the experiment were picked at random. Tools included the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (C-CEI(®)), the Learning Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Questionnaire, and the Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI). The Wilcoxon-signed rank test was utilized to compare the self-confidence scores among intervention and control group of students, and the paired sample test was used to compare clinical judgment scores. Cohen’s d was used to assess the effect size, and Spearman correlation was used to explore the association. RESULTS: Clinical decision-making ability and self-confidence measures revealed statistical and practical differences between before and after simulation. There was a mean difference of 2.28 (95% CI, 1.78, 2.79), t (45)=9.13, p 0.001, and an effect size of 1.3, p 0.001. A pre-and post-simulation self-confidence measure showed statistically significant improvement after simulation (W = 1, Z = −3.57, P 0.001). A moderately significant positive connection (r = 0.419, p 0.004) was also discovered. CONCLUSION: The study found that human expert patient simulation is a tremendous clinical training technique for improving students’ clinical decision-making skill competency and self-confidence. Dove 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10361458/ /pubmed/37483524 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S402610 Text en © 2023 Shinde et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Shinde, Sanjay
Tiruneh, Firew
Fufa, Dinaol Abdissa
The Effect of Expert Patient Simulation on Clinical Judgment: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title The Effect of Expert Patient Simulation on Clinical Judgment: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_full The Effect of Expert Patient Simulation on Clinical Judgment: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_fullStr The Effect of Expert Patient Simulation on Clinical Judgment: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Expert Patient Simulation on Clinical Judgment: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_short The Effect of Expert Patient Simulation on Clinical Judgment: A Quasi-Experimental Study
title_sort effect of expert patient simulation on clinical judgment: a quasi-experimental study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483524
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S402610
work_keys_str_mv AT shindesanjay theeffectofexpertpatientsimulationonclinicaljudgmentaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT tirunehfirew theeffectofexpertpatientsimulationonclinicaljudgmentaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT fufadinaolabdissa theeffectofexpertpatientsimulationonclinicaljudgmentaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT shindesanjay effectofexpertpatientsimulationonclinicaljudgmentaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT tirunehfirew effectofexpertpatientsimulationonclinicaljudgmentaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT fufadinaolabdissa effectofexpertpatientsimulationonclinicaljudgmentaquasiexperimentalstudy