Cargando…

Key predictors of psychological distress and wellbeing in Australian frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19 (Omicron wave)

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant challenges for frontline healthcare workers’ (FHW), raising many mental health and wellbeing concerns for this cohort. To facilitate identification of risk and protective factors to inform treatment and interventions, this study investigated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Brian En Chyi, Ling, Mathew, Boyd, Leanne, Olsson, Craig A., Sheen, Jade
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1200839
_version_ 1785076247008641024
author Lee, Brian En Chyi
Ling, Mathew
Boyd, Leanne
Olsson, Craig A.
Sheen, Jade
author_facet Lee, Brian En Chyi
Ling, Mathew
Boyd, Leanne
Olsson, Craig A.
Sheen, Jade
author_sort Lee, Brian En Chyi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant challenges for frontline healthcare workers’ (FHW), raising many mental health and wellbeing concerns for this cohort. To facilitate identification of risk and protective factors to inform treatment and interventions, this study investigated key predictors of psychological distress and subjective wellbeing in FHWs. METHODS: During the Omicron wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2022), Victorian (Australia) doctors, nurses, allied health and non-medical staff from Emergency Departments, Intensive Care units, Aged Care, Hospital In The Home, and COVID Wards completed a cross-sectional survey consisting of the Kessler 6 item (Psychological Distress), Personal Wellbeing Index (Subjective Wellbeing), Coronavirus Health Impact Survey tool (COVID-19 related factors) and occupational factors. Multivariable linear regressions were used to evaluate unadjusted and adjusted associations. Relative weight analysis was used to compare and identify key predictors. RESULTS: Out of 167 participants, 18.1% screened positive for a probable mental illness and a further 15.3% screened positive for low wellbeing. Key risk factors for greater psychological distress included COVID infection worries, relationship stress and younger age. For both psychological distress and lower wellbeing, health status and supervisor support were key protective factors, while infection risks were key risk factors. Only positive changes in relationship quality was protective of lower wellbeing. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the significance of social determinants and individual level factors alongside work related factors, in influencing FHWs’ mental health and wellbeing during public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings suggest that future interventions and supports should take a more holistic approach that considers work, social and individual level factors when supporting FHWs’ mental health and wellbeing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10361570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103615702023-07-22 Key predictors of psychological distress and wellbeing in Australian frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19 (Omicron wave) Lee, Brian En Chyi Ling, Mathew Boyd, Leanne Olsson, Craig A. Sheen, Jade Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant challenges for frontline healthcare workers’ (FHW), raising many mental health and wellbeing concerns for this cohort. To facilitate identification of risk and protective factors to inform treatment and interventions, this study investigated key predictors of psychological distress and subjective wellbeing in FHWs. METHODS: During the Omicron wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2022), Victorian (Australia) doctors, nurses, allied health and non-medical staff from Emergency Departments, Intensive Care units, Aged Care, Hospital In The Home, and COVID Wards completed a cross-sectional survey consisting of the Kessler 6 item (Psychological Distress), Personal Wellbeing Index (Subjective Wellbeing), Coronavirus Health Impact Survey tool (COVID-19 related factors) and occupational factors. Multivariable linear regressions were used to evaluate unadjusted and adjusted associations. Relative weight analysis was used to compare and identify key predictors. RESULTS: Out of 167 participants, 18.1% screened positive for a probable mental illness and a further 15.3% screened positive for low wellbeing. Key risk factors for greater psychological distress included COVID infection worries, relationship stress and younger age. For both psychological distress and lower wellbeing, health status and supervisor support were key protective factors, while infection risks were key risk factors. Only positive changes in relationship quality was protective of lower wellbeing. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the significance of social determinants and individual level factors alongside work related factors, in influencing FHWs’ mental health and wellbeing during public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings suggest that future interventions and supports should take a more holistic approach that considers work, social and individual level factors when supporting FHWs’ mental health and wellbeing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10361570/ /pubmed/37484084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1200839 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lee, Ling, Boyd, Olsson and Sheen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lee, Brian En Chyi
Ling, Mathew
Boyd, Leanne
Olsson, Craig A.
Sheen, Jade
Key predictors of psychological distress and wellbeing in Australian frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19 (Omicron wave)
title Key predictors of psychological distress and wellbeing in Australian frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19 (Omicron wave)
title_full Key predictors of psychological distress and wellbeing in Australian frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19 (Omicron wave)
title_fullStr Key predictors of psychological distress and wellbeing in Australian frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19 (Omicron wave)
title_full_unstemmed Key predictors of psychological distress and wellbeing in Australian frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19 (Omicron wave)
title_short Key predictors of psychological distress and wellbeing in Australian frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19 (Omicron wave)
title_sort key predictors of psychological distress and wellbeing in australian frontline healthcare workers during covid-19 (omicron wave)
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1200839
work_keys_str_mv AT leebrianenchyi keypredictorsofpsychologicaldistressandwellbeinginaustralianfrontlinehealthcareworkersduringcovid19omicronwave
AT lingmathew keypredictorsofpsychologicaldistressandwellbeinginaustralianfrontlinehealthcareworkersduringcovid19omicronwave
AT boydleanne keypredictorsofpsychologicaldistressandwellbeinginaustralianfrontlinehealthcareworkersduringcovid19omicronwave
AT olssoncraiga keypredictorsofpsychologicaldistressandwellbeinginaustralianfrontlinehealthcareworkersduringcovid19omicronwave
AT sheenjade keypredictorsofpsychologicaldistressandwellbeinginaustralianfrontlinehealthcareworkersduringcovid19omicronwave