Cargando…

Lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality protocol

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Suicide risk assessment protocols have traditionally been developed by clinical or research experts in suicidology, with little formal involvement of those with a lived experience of suicide. This study broadly aimed to seek lived experience perspectives of the Systematic Tailor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawgood, Jacinta, Betterridge, Carmen, Kõlves, Kairi, Edwards, Bronwen, Spence, Susan H., Arensman, Ella, De Leo, Diego, Ownsworth, Tamara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1074805
_version_ 1785076247889444864
author Hawgood, Jacinta
Betterridge, Carmen
Kõlves, Kairi
Edwards, Bronwen
Spence, Susan H.
Arensman, Ella
De Leo, Diego
Ownsworth, Tamara
author_facet Hawgood, Jacinta
Betterridge, Carmen
Kõlves, Kairi
Edwards, Bronwen
Spence, Susan H.
Arensman, Ella
De Leo, Diego
Ownsworth, Tamara
author_sort Hawgood, Jacinta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Suicide risk assessment protocols have traditionally been developed by clinical or research experts in suicidology, with little formal involvement of those with a lived experience of suicide. This study broadly aimed to seek lived experience perspectives of the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality (STARS) protocol A further aim was to elicit lived experience suggestions for wording and language used in the existing items within sections of the STARS protocol (STARS-p). METHOD: Participants were 33 adults (Female = 64%) with a lived experience of suicide, who attended a virtual research workshop at the National Lived Experience of Suicide Summit (2021). After being educated about STARS-p, participants provided their overall perceptions of STARS-p as well as suggestions for rewording and language use across the sections of STARS-p. Their responses were gathered using a virtual online platform for live electronic data collection. A three-phase process of qualitative content analysis was used, engaging both inductive and deductive approaches to explore study aims one and two, respectively. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research was followed to enhance quality of reporting. RESULTS: Qualitative content analysis of participants’ views of the STARS-p reflected three main categories, namely, STARS philosophy; What STARS aspires to; and Continuity of care and meeting needs. Responses characterized participants’ perceptions of the core purpose of STARS-p and ways for refining or adapting it to suit diverse needs and settings. Based on deductive content analysis, suggested modifications to wording of items and additional items to extend sections were identified. CONCLUSION: The study yielded novel perspectives from those with a lived experience of suicide, which will inform improvements to the next edition of STARS-p. The STARS training (required for licensed use of the protocol) will be updated accordingly, in line with these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10361574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103615742023-07-22 Lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality protocol Hawgood, Jacinta Betterridge, Carmen Kõlves, Kairi Edwards, Bronwen Spence, Susan H. Arensman, Ella De Leo, Diego Ownsworth, Tamara Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Suicide risk assessment protocols have traditionally been developed by clinical or research experts in suicidology, with little formal involvement of those with a lived experience of suicide. This study broadly aimed to seek lived experience perspectives of the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality (STARS) protocol A further aim was to elicit lived experience suggestions for wording and language used in the existing items within sections of the STARS protocol (STARS-p). METHOD: Participants were 33 adults (Female = 64%) with a lived experience of suicide, who attended a virtual research workshop at the National Lived Experience of Suicide Summit (2021). After being educated about STARS-p, participants provided their overall perceptions of STARS-p as well as suggestions for rewording and language use across the sections of STARS-p. Their responses were gathered using a virtual online platform for live electronic data collection. A three-phase process of qualitative content analysis was used, engaging both inductive and deductive approaches to explore study aims one and two, respectively. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research was followed to enhance quality of reporting. RESULTS: Qualitative content analysis of participants’ views of the STARS-p reflected three main categories, namely, STARS philosophy; What STARS aspires to; and Continuity of care and meeting needs. Responses characterized participants’ perceptions of the core purpose of STARS-p and ways for refining or adapting it to suit diverse needs and settings. Based on deductive content analysis, suggested modifications to wording of items and additional items to extend sections were identified. CONCLUSION: The study yielded novel perspectives from those with a lived experience of suicide, which will inform improvements to the next edition of STARS-p. The STARS training (required for licensed use of the protocol) will be updated accordingly, in line with these results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10361574/ /pubmed/37484664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1074805 Text en Copyright © 2023 Hawgood, Betterridge, Kõlves, Edwards, Spence, Arensman, De Leo and Ownsworth. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Hawgood, Jacinta
Betterridge, Carmen
Kõlves, Kairi
Edwards, Bronwen
Spence, Susan H.
Arensman, Ella
De Leo, Diego
Ownsworth, Tamara
Lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality protocol
title Lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality protocol
title_full Lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality protocol
title_fullStr Lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality protocol
title_full_unstemmed Lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality protocol
title_short Lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality protocol
title_sort lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the systematic tailored assessment for responding to suicidality protocol
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1074805
work_keys_str_mv AT hawgoodjacinta livedexperienceperspectivesguidingimprovementstothesystematictailoredassessmentforrespondingtosuicidalityprotocol
AT betterridgecarmen livedexperienceperspectivesguidingimprovementstothesystematictailoredassessmentforrespondingtosuicidalityprotocol
AT kolveskairi livedexperienceperspectivesguidingimprovementstothesystematictailoredassessmentforrespondingtosuicidalityprotocol
AT edwardsbronwen livedexperienceperspectivesguidingimprovementstothesystematictailoredassessmentforrespondingtosuicidalityprotocol
AT spencesusanh livedexperienceperspectivesguidingimprovementstothesystematictailoredassessmentforrespondingtosuicidalityprotocol
AT arensmanella livedexperienceperspectivesguidingimprovementstothesystematictailoredassessmentforrespondingtosuicidalityprotocol
AT deleodiego livedexperienceperspectivesguidingimprovementstothesystematictailoredassessmentforrespondingtosuicidalityprotocol
AT ownsworthtamara livedexperienceperspectivesguidingimprovementstothesystematictailoredassessmentforrespondingtosuicidalityprotocol