Cargando…
Inverted Pedicled Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Attached to an Optic Disc with Autologous Blood Clot for Large Macular Holes
PURPOSE: An inverted ILM flap might be accidentally separated from the retina or sucked away during surgery for large macular holes (MHs). This article is to determine the efficacy of a new inverted pedicled internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap attached to an optic disc with an autologous blood clo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7640476 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: An inverted ILM flap might be accidentally separated from the retina or sucked away during surgery for large macular holes (MHs). This article is to determine the efficacy of a new inverted pedicled internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap attached to an optic disc with an autologous blood clot (ABC) technique for the treatment of large MHs. METHODS: An inverted pedicled ILM flap connected to the optic disc with ABC was used to treat 12 consecutive patients with significant macular holes (>600 m). The ILM was first peeled off around MH as a semidiameter of about 1.5 diameters of the optic disc. The superior residual ILM was used to produce a pedicled ILM flap that was connected to the optic disc and was later inverted to cover the MH. The macular hole was covered with a repositioned flap larger than 2 MH diameters in an inverted way. ABC was used to fasten the flap, followed by fluid-air exchange with air or C3F8 as tamponade. Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were performed at each postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: The mean aperture and base macular hole diameters were 737.9 ± 109.6 µm (range, 607–982 µm) and 1244.3 ± 227.4 µm (range, 975–1658 µm). All macular holes (100%) were closed after a single surgery without intraoperative or postoperative complications related to the ILM transposition technique. At the last postoperative visit, we found one eye with a U-shaped closure, three eyes with W-shaped closures, and eight eyes with V-shaped closures. No postoperative flap closures were noted in all cases. The preoperative mean BCVA was 1.5 ± 0.3 (range, 1.1–2.0). After a mean follow-up of 5.3 ± 4.8 (range, 3–16) months, the postoperative mean BCVA was 0.8 ± 0.2 (range, 0.6–1.1), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This novel technique is safe and suitable for large MHs and can be an alternative option for accidental ILM flap loss during other inverted ILM flap operations. |
---|