Cargando…

Avoiding incompatible drug pairs in central-venous catheters of patients receiving critical care: an algorithm-based analysis and a staff survey

PURPOSE: In a critical care setting, we aimed to identify and solve physico-chemical drug incompatibilities in central-venous catheters considering the staffs’ knowledge and assumptions about incompatibilities. METHODS: (i) After positive ethical vote, an algorithm to identify incompatibilities was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Leonhardt Alexander Fabian, Neininger, Martina Patrizia, Hensen, Jan, Zube, Olaf, Bertsche, Thilo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-023-03509-0
_version_ 1785076303348629504
author Wagner, Leonhardt Alexander Fabian
Neininger, Martina Patrizia
Hensen, Jan
Zube, Olaf
Bertsche, Thilo
author_facet Wagner, Leonhardt Alexander Fabian
Neininger, Martina Patrizia
Hensen, Jan
Zube, Olaf
Bertsche, Thilo
author_sort Wagner, Leonhardt Alexander Fabian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In a critical care setting, we aimed to identify and solve physico-chemical drug incompatibilities in central-venous catheters considering the staffs’ knowledge and assumptions about incompatibilities. METHODS: (i) After positive ethical vote, an algorithm to identify incompatibilities was developed and applied. The algorithm was based on KIK(®) database and Stabilis(®) database, the drug label, and Trissel textbook. (ii) A questionnaire was created and used that asked staff for knowledge and assumptions about incompatibilities. (iii) A 4-step avoidance recommendation was developed and applied. RESULTS: (i) At least one incompatibility was identified in 64 (61.4%) of 104 enrolled patients. Eighty one (62.3%) of 130 incompatible combinations affected piperacillin/tazobactam and in 18 (13.8%) each furosemide and pantoprazole. (ii) 37.8% (n = 14) of the staff members participated in the questionnaire survey (median age: 31, IQR: 4.75 years). The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and pantoprazole was incorrectly judged to be compatible by 85.7%. Only rarely felt the majority of respondents unsafe in administering drugs (median score: 1; 0, never to 5, always). (iii) In those 64 patients with at least one incompatibility, 68 avoidance recommendations were given, and all were fully accepted. In 44 (64.7%) of 68 recommendations “Step 1: Administer sequentially” was suggested as a avoidance strategy. In 9/68 (13.2%) “Step 2: Use another lumen”, in 7/68 (10.3%) “Step 3: Take a break”, and in 8/68 (11.8%) “Step 4: Use catheters with more lumens” were recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Although incompatibilities were common, the staff rarely felt unsafe when administering drugs. Knowledge deficits correlated well with the incompatibilities identified. All recommendations were fully accepted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-023-03509-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10361869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103618692023-07-23 Avoiding incompatible drug pairs in central-venous catheters of patients receiving critical care: an algorithm-based analysis and a staff survey Wagner, Leonhardt Alexander Fabian Neininger, Martina Patrizia Hensen, Jan Zube, Olaf Bertsche, Thilo Eur J Clin Pharmacol Research PURPOSE: In a critical care setting, we aimed to identify and solve physico-chemical drug incompatibilities in central-venous catheters considering the staffs’ knowledge and assumptions about incompatibilities. METHODS: (i) After positive ethical vote, an algorithm to identify incompatibilities was developed and applied. The algorithm was based on KIK(®) database and Stabilis(®) database, the drug label, and Trissel textbook. (ii) A questionnaire was created and used that asked staff for knowledge and assumptions about incompatibilities. (iii) A 4-step avoidance recommendation was developed and applied. RESULTS: (i) At least one incompatibility was identified in 64 (61.4%) of 104 enrolled patients. Eighty one (62.3%) of 130 incompatible combinations affected piperacillin/tazobactam and in 18 (13.8%) each furosemide and pantoprazole. (ii) 37.8% (n = 14) of the staff members participated in the questionnaire survey (median age: 31, IQR: 4.75 years). The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and pantoprazole was incorrectly judged to be compatible by 85.7%. Only rarely felt the majority of respondents unsafe in administering drugs (median score: 1; 0, never to 5, always). (iii) In those 64 patients with at least one incompatibility, 68 avoidance recommendations were given, and all were fully accepted. In 44 (64.7%) of 68 recommendations “Step 1: Administer sequentially” was suggested as a avoidance strategy. In 9/68 (13.2%) “Step 2: Use another lumen”, in 7/68 (10.3%) “Step 3: Take a break”, and in 8/68 (11.8%) “Step 4: Use catheters with more lumens” were recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Although incompatibilities were common, the staff rarely felt unsafe when administering drugs. Knowledge deficits correlated well with the incompatibilities identified. All recommendations were fully accepted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-023-03509-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10361869/ /pubmed/37284873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-023-03509-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Wagner, Leonhardt Alexander Fabian
Neininger, Martina Patrizia
Hensen, Jan
Zube, Olaf
Bertsche, Thilo
Avoiding incompatible drug pairs in central-venous catheters of patients receiving critical care: an algorithm-based analysis and a staff survey
title Avoiding incompatible drug pairs in central-venous catheters of patients receiving critical care: an algorithm-based analysis and a staff survey
title_full Avoiding incompatible drug pairs in central-venous catheters of patients receiving critical care: an algorithm-based analysis and a staff survey
title_fullStr Avoiding incompatible drug pairs in central-venous catheters of patients receiving critical care: an algorithm-based analysis and a staff survey
title_full_unstemmed Avoiding incompatible drug pairs in central-venous catheters of patients receiving critical care: an algorithm-based analysis and a staff survey
title_short Avoiding incompatible drug pairs in central-venous catheters of patients receiving critical care: an algorithm-based analysis and a staff survey
title_sort avoiding incompatible drug pairs in central-venous catheters of patients receiving critical care: an algorithm-based analysis and a staff survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-023-03509-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnerleonhardtalexanderfabian avoidingincompatibledrugpairsincentralvenouscathetersofpatientsreceivingcriticalcareanalgorithmbasedanalysisandastaffsurvey
AT neiningermartinapatrizia avoidingincompatibledrugpairsincentralvenouscathetersofpatientsreceivingcriticalcareanalgorithmbasedanalysisandastaffsurvey
AT hensenjan avoidingincompatibledrugpairsincentralvenouscathetersofpatientsreceivingcriticalcareanalgorithmbasedanalysisandastaffsurvey
AT zubeolaf avoidingincompatibledrugpairsincentralvenouscathetersofpatientsreceivingcriticalcareanalgorithmbasedanalysisandastaffsurvey
AT bertschethilo avoidingincompatibledrugpairsincentralvenouscathetersofpatientsreceivingcriticalcareanalgorithmbasedanalysisandastaffsurvey