Cargando…

Evaluation Methods in Clinical Health Technologies: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to classify the types of evaluation methods in clinical health technologies based on a systematic review method. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in three scientific databases including Scopus, PubMed and ISI. The search strategy was performed in Jul t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadzadeh, Niloofar, Rahmani Katigari, Meysam, Hosseini, Rahil, Pahlevanynejad, Shahrbanoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484728
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i5.12708
_version_ 1785076373410283520
author Mohammadzadeh, Niloofar
Rahmani Katigari, Meysam
Hosseini, Rahil
Pahlevanynejad, Shahrbanoo
author_facet Mohammadzadeh, Niloofar
Rahmani Katigari, Meysam
Hosseini, Rahil
Pahlevanynejad, Shahrbanoo
author_sort Mohammadzadeh, Niloofar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to classify the types of evaluation methods in clinical health technologies based on a systematic review method. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in three scientific databases including Scopus, PubMed and ISI. The search strategy was performed in Jul to Nov 2021 and based on the three main concepts of “evaluation”, “technology”, “health. This search has been restricted to 10 years (2011–2021). Moreover, it only was limited to English and papers published in journals and conferences proceeding. RESULTS: Overall, 8149 references were identified for title and abstract screening. Full text screening was performed for 2674 articles, with 174 meeting the criteria for study inclusion. CONCLUSION: Most of the technologies evaluated in these articles were associated with PC-based systems (N=107), and there have been fewer mobile apps (N=67). Most of used technologies were with goals of treatment (43%, N=74) and education (26%, N=45). Among all the methods, the most and the least used methods were usability (66%, N=115) and qualitative (1%, N=2) method, respectively. The most method for health clinical technologies is usability method especially in telemedicine field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10362203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103622032023-07-23 Evaluation Methods in Clinical Health Technologies: A Systematic Review Mohammadzadeh, Niloofar Rahmani Katigari, Meysam Hosseini, Rahil Pahlevanynejad, Shahrbanoo Iran J Public Health Review Article BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to classify the types of evaluation methods in clinical health technologies based on a systematic review method. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in three scientific databases including Scopus, PubMed and ISI. The search strategy was performed in Jul to Nov 2021 and based on the three main concepts of “evaluation”, “technology”, “health. This search has been restricted to 10 years (2011–2021). Moreover, it only was limited to English and papers published in journals and conferences proceeding. RESULTS: Overall, 8149 references were identified for title and abstract screening. Full text screening was performed for 2674 articles, with 174 meeting the criteria for study inclusion. CONCLUSION: Most of the technologies evaluated in these articles were associated with PC-based systems (N=107), and there have been fewer mobile apps (N=67). Most of used technologies were with goals of treatment (43%, N=74) and education (26%, N=45). Among all the methods, the most and the least used methods were usability (66%, N=115) and qualitative (1%, N=2) method, respectively. The most method for health clinical technologies is usability method especially in telemedicine field. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10362203/ /pubmed/37484728 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i5.12708 Text en Copyright © 2023 Mohammadzadeh et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Mohammadzadeh, Niloofar
Rahmani Katigari, Meysam
Hosseini, Rahil
Pahlevanynejad, Shahrbanoo
Evaluation Methods in Clinical Health Technologies: A Systematic Review
title Evaluation Methods in Clinical Health Technologies: A Systematic Review
title_full Evaluation Methods in Clinical Health Technologies: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Evaluation Methods in Clinical Health Technologies: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation Methods in Clinical Health Technologies: A Systematic Review
title_short Evaluation Methods in Clinical Health Technologies: A Systematic Review
title_sort evaluation methods in clinical health technologies: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484728
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i5.12708
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadzadehniloofar evaluationmethodsinclinicalhealthtechnologiesasystematicreview
AT rahmanikatigarimeysam evaluationmethodsinclinicalhealthtechnologiesasystematicreview
AT hosseinirahil evaluationmethodsinclinicalhealthtechnologiesasystematicreview
AT pahlevanynejadshahrbanoo evaluationmethodsinclinicalhealthtechnologiesasystematicreview