Cargando…

Comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist()

INTRODUCTION: Transthoracic echocardiography is a safe and readily available tool for noninvasive monitoring of Cardiac Output (CO). The use of the suprasternal window situated at the sternal notch can be an alternative approach for estimating blood flow. The present study aimed to compare two metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Souza, Rafaela Souto e, Melo, Wendhell Barros de, Freire, Claudia Maria Vilas, Vilas Boas, Walkiria Wingester
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34246688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.063
_version_ 1785076424614346752
author Souza, Rafaela Souto e
Melo, Wendhell Barros de
Freire, Claudia Maria Vilas
Vilas Boas, Walkiria Wingester
author_facet Souza, Rafaela Souto e
Melo, Wendhell Barros de
Freire, Claudia Maria Vilas
Vilas Boas, Walkiria Wingester
author_sort Souza, Rafaela Souto e
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Transthoracic echocardiography is a safe and readily available tool for noninvasive monitoring of Cardiac Output (CO). The use of the suprasternal window situated at the sternal notch can be an alternative approach for estimating blood flow. The present study aimed to compare two methods of CO calculation. We compared the descending aorta Velocity-Time Integral (VTI) measurement from the suprasternal window view with the standard technique to determine CO that uses VTI measurements from the LVOT (Left Ventricular Outflow Tract) view. We also aimed to find out whether after basic training a non-echocardiographer operator can obtain reproducible measurements of VTI using this approach. METHODS: In the first part of the study, 26 patients without known cardiovascular diseases were evaluated and VTI data were acquired from the suprasternal window by a non-echocardiographer and an echocardiographer. Next, 17 patients were evaluated by an echocardiographer only and VTI and CO measurements were obtained from suprasternal and apical windows. Data were analyzed using the Bland and Altman method (BA), correlation and regression. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between measurements obtained by a non-expert and an expert echocardiographer and detected that an inexperienced trainee can acquire VTI measurements from the suprasternal window view. Regarding agreement between CO measurements, data obtained showed a positive correlation and the Bland and Altman analysis presented a total variation of 38.9%. CONCLUSION: Regarding accuracy, it is likely that TTE (Transthoracic Echocardiogram) measurements of CO from the suprasternal window view are comparable to other minimally invasive techniques currently available. Due to its user-friendliness and low cost, it can be a convenient technique for obtaining perioperative hemodynamic measurements, even by inexperienced operators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10362443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103624432023-07-23 Comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist() Souza, Rafaela Souto e Melo, Wendhell Barros de Freire, Claudia Maria Vilas Vilas Boas, Walkiria Wingester Braz J Anesthesiol Original Investigation INTRODUCTION: Transthoracic echocardiography is a safe and readily available tool for noninvasive monitoring of Cardiac Output (CO). The use of the suprasternal window situated at the sternal notch can be an alternative approach for estimating blood flow. The present study aimed to compare two methods of CO calculation. We compared the descending aorta Velocity-Time Integral (VTI) measurement from the suprasternal window view with the standard technique to determine CO that uses VTI measurements from the LVOT (Left Ventricular Outflow Tract) view. We also aimed to find out whether after basic training a non-echocardiographer operator can obtain reproducible measurements of VTI using this approach. METHODS: In the first part of the study, 26 patients without known cardiovascular diseases were evaluated and VTI data were acquired from the suprasternal window by a non-echocardiographer and an echocardiographer. Next, 17 patients were evaluated by an echocardiographer only and VTI and CO measurements were obtained from suprasternal and apical windows. Data were analyzed using the Bland and Altman method (BA), correlation and regression. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between measurements obtained by a non-expert and an expert echocardiographer and detected that an inexperienced trainee can acquire VTI measurements from the suprasternal window view. Regarding agreement between CO measurements, data obtained showed a positive correlation and the Bland and Altman analysis presented a total variation of 38.9%. CONCLUSION: Regarding accuracy, it is likely that TTE (Transthoracic Echocardiogram) measurements of CO from the suprasternal window view are comparable to other minimally invasive techniques currently available. Due to its user-friendliness and low cost, it can be a convenient technique for obtaining perioperative hemodynamic measurements, even by inexperienced operators. Elsevier 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10362443/ /pubmed/34246688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.063 Text en © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Souza, Rafaela Souto e
Melo, Wendhell Barros de
Freire, Claudia Maria Vilas
Vilas Boas, Walkiria Wingester
Comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist()
title Comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist()
title_full Comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist()
title_fullStr Comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist()
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist()
title_short Comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist()
title_sort comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist()
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34246688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.063
work_keys_str_mv AT souzarafaelasoutoe comparativestudybetweensuprasternalandapicalwindowsauserfriendlycardiacoutputmeasurementfortheanesthesiologist
AT melowendhellbarrosde comparativestudybetweensuprasternalandapicalwindowsauserfriendlycardiacoutputmeasurementfortheanesthesiologist
AT freireclaudiamariavilas comparativestudybetweensuprasternalandapicalwindowsauserfriendlycardiacoutputmeasurementfortheanesthesiologist
AT vilasboaswalkiriawingester comparativestudybetweensuprasternalandapicalwindowsauserfriendlycardiacoutputmeasurementfortheanesthesiologist