Cargando…

RNA-seq research landscape in Africa: systematic review reveals disparities and opportunities

RNA sequencing has emerged as the standard method for transcriptome profiling of several human diseases. We performed a systematic review detailing the state of RNA-seq analyses in Africa from its inception till February 2022. Our goal was to provide an update on the state of RNA-seq analyses in Afr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doughan, Albert, Adingo, Wisdom, Salifu, Samson Pandam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37480073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01206-3
_version_ 1785076462056898560
author Doughan, Albert
Adingo, Wisdom
Salifu, Samson Pandam
author_facet Doughan, Albert
Adingo, Wisdom
Salifu, Samson Pandam
author_sort Doughan, Albert
collection PubMed
description RNA sequencing has emerged as the standard method for transcriptome profiling of several human diseases. We performed a systematic review detailing the state of RNA-seq analyses in Africa from its inception till February 2022. Our goal was to provide an update on the state of RNA-seq analyses in Africa, including research gaps, funding information, participants information, authorship and collaborations. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed an exhaustive literature search for RNA-seq studies conducted in Africa, using PubMed, Scopus and Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost). The output was exported to Endnote X9 for analyses. The initial literature search yielded 10,369 articles spread across PubMed (4916), Scopus (4847) and EBSCOhost (580). By applying our exclusion criteria, 28 full-text articles remained and were thoroughly analyzed. Overall, 17 human diseases were studied, including cancers (10/28), infectious disease (4/28), parasitic disease (4/28), autoimmune disorders (2/28) and neglected tropical diseases (2/28). Majority of the articles were published in PLoS Pathogens, BioMed Central and Nature. The National Institutes of Health (42.4%), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (7.5%) and the Wellcome Trust (7.5%) were the top funders of the research studies. Eleven African countries contributed to the participant group, with 57% located in Eastern Africa, 23.1% from Western and 16.7% from Southern Africa. The extremely low number of RNA-seq research studies in Africa is worrying and calls for an immediate investment in research by the African governments. The funding agencies and institutional review boards should also ensure that African collaborators are treated equitably in the course of the research projects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-023-01206-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10362609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103626092023-07-23 RNA-seq research landscape in Africa: systematic review reveals disparities and opportunities Doughan, Albert Adingo, Wisdom Salifu, Samson Pandam Eur J Med Res Research RNA sequencing has emerged as the standard method for transcriptome profiling of several human diseases. We performed a systematic review detailing the state of RNA-seq analyses in Africa from its inception till February 2022. Our goal was to provide an update on the state of RNA-seq analyses in Africa, including research gaps, funding information, participants information, authorship and collaborations. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed an exhaustive literature search for RNA-seq studies conducted in Africa, using PubMed, Scopus and Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost). The output was exported to Endnote X9 for analyses. The initial literature search yielded 10,369 articles spread across PubMed (4916), Scopus (4847) and EBSCOhost (580). By applying our exclusion criteria, 28 full-text articles remained and were thoroughly analyzed. Overall, 17 human diseases were studied, including cancers (10/28), infectious disease (4/28), parasitic disease (4/28), autoimmune disorders (2/28) and neglected tropical diseases (2/28). Majority of the articles were published in PLoS Pathogens, BioMed Central and Nature. The National Institutes of Health (42.4%), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (7.5%) and the Wellcome Trust (7.5%) were the top funders of the research studies. Eleven African countries contributed to the participant group, with 57% located in Eastern Africa, 23.1% from Western and 16.7% from Southern Africa. The extremely low number of RNA-seq research studies in Africa is worrying and calls for an immediate investment in research by the African governments. The funding agencies and institutional review boards should also ensure that African collaborators are treated equitably in the course of the research projects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-023-01206-3. BioMed Central 2023-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10362609/ /pubmed/37480073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01206-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Doughan, Albert
Adingo, Wisdom
Salifu, Samson Pandam
RNA-seq research landscape in Africa: systematic review reveals disparities and opportunities
title RNA-seq research landscape in Africa: systematic review reveals disparities and opportunities
title_full RNA-seq research landscape in Africa: systematic review reveals disparities and opportunities
title_fullStr RNA-seq research landscape in Africa: systematic review reveals disparities and opportunities
title_full_unstemmed RNA-seq research landscape in Africa: systematic review reveals disparities and opportunities
title_short RNA-seq research landscape in Africa: systematic review reveals disparities and opportunities
title_sort rna-seq research landscape in africa: systematic review reveals disparities and opportunities
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37480073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01206-3
work_keys_str_mv AT doughanalbert rnaseqresearchlandscapeinafricasystematicreviewrevealsdisparitiesandopportunities
AT adingowisdom rnaseqresearchlandscapeinafricasystematicreviewrevealsdisparitiesandopportunities
AT salifusamsonpandam rnaseqresearchlandscapeinafricasystematicreviewrevealsdisparitiesandopportunities