Cargando…

Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture

OBJECTIVE: Communication about patients’ values, goals, and prognosis in serious illness (serious illness communication) is a cornerstone of person-centered care yet difficult to implement in practice. As part of Serious Illness Care Program implementation in five health systems, we studied the clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paladino, Joanna, Sanders, Justin J., Fromme, Erik K., Block, Susan, Jacobsen, Juliet C., Jackson, Vicki A., Ritchie, Christine S., Mitchell, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37481530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01229-x
_version_ 1785076476872228864
author Paladino, Joanna
Sanders, Justin J.
Fromme, Erik K.
Block, Susan
Jacobsen, Juliet C.
Jackson, Vicki A.
Ritchie, Christine S.
Mitchell, Suzanne
author_facet Paladino, Joanna
Sanders, Justin J.
Fromme, Erik K.
Block, Susan
Jacobsen, Juliet C.
Jackson, Vicki A.
Ritchie, Christine S.
Mitchell, Suzanne
author_sort Paladino, Joanna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Communication about patients’ values, goals, and prognosis in serious illness (serious illness communication) is a cornerstone of person-centered care yet difficult to implement in practice. As part of Serious Illness Care Program implementation in five health systems, we studied the clinical culture-related factors that supported or impeded improvement in serious illness conversations. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews of clinical leaders, implementation teams, and frontline champions. RESULTS: We completed 30 interviews across palliative care, oncology, primary care, and hospital medicine. Participants identified four culture-related domains that influenced serious illness communication improvement: (1) clinical paradigms; (2) interprofessional empowerment; (3) perceived conversation impact; (4) practice norms. Changes in clinicians’ beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors in these domains supported values and goals conversations, including: shifting paradigms about serious illness communication from ‘end-of-life planning’ to ‘knowing and honoring what matters most to patients;’ improvements in psychological safety that empowered advanced practice clinicians, nurses and social workers to take expanded roles; experiencing benefits of earlier values and goals conversations; shifting from avoidant norms to integration norms in which earlier serious illness discussions became part of routine processes. Culture-related inhibitors included: beliefs that conversations are about dying or withdrawing care; attitudes that serious illness communication is the physician’s job; discomfort managing emotions; lack of reliable processes. CONCLUSIONS: Aspects of clinical culture, such as paradigms about serious illness communication and inter-professional empowerment, are linked to successful adoption of serious illness communication. Further research is warranted to identify effective strategies to enhance clinical culture and drive clinician practice change. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-023-01229-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10362669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103626692023-07-23 Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture Paladino, Joanna Sanders, Justin J. Fromme, Erik K. Block, Susan Jacobsen, Juliet C. Jackson, Vicki A. Ritchie, Christine S. Mitchell, Suzanne BMC Palliat Care Research OBJECTIVE: Communication about patients’ values, goals, and prognosis in serious illness (serious illness communication) is a cornerstone of person-centered care yet difficult to implement in practice. As part of Serious Illness Care Program implementation in five health systems, we studied the clinical culture-related factors that supported or impeded improvement in serious illness conversations. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews of clinical leaders, implementation teams, and frontline champions. RESULTS: We completed 30 interviews across palliative care, oncology, primary care, and hospital medicine. Participants identified four culture-related domains that influenced serious illness communication improvement: (1) clinical paradigms; (2) interprofessional empowerment; (3) perceived conversation impact; (4) practice norms. Changes in clinicians’ beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors in these domains supported values and goals conversations, including: shifting paradigms about serious illness communication from ‘end-of-life planning’ to ‘knowing and honoring what matters most to patients;’ improvements in psychological safety that empowered advanced practice clinicians, nurses and social workers to take expanded roles; experiencing benefits of earlier values and goals conversations; shifting from avoidant norms to integration norms in which earlier serious illness discussions became part of routine processes. Culture-related inhibitors included: beliefs that conversations are about dying or withdrawing care; attitudes that serious illness communication is the physician’s job; discomfort managing emotions; lack of reliable processes. CONCLUSIONS: Aspects of clinical culture, such as paradigms about serious illness communication and inter-professional empowerment, are linked to successful adoption of serious illness communication. Further research is warranted to identify effective strategies to enhance clinical culture and drive clinician practice change. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-023-01229-x. BioMed Central 2023-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10362669/ /pubmed/37481530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01229-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Paladino, Joanna
Sanders, Justin J.
Fromme, Erik K.
Block, Susan
Jacobsen, Juliet C.
Jackson, Vicki A.
Ritchie, Christine S.
Mitchell, Suzanne
Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture
title Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture
title_full Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture
title_fullStr Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture
title_full_unstemmed Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture
title_short Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture
title_sort improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37481530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01229-x
work_keys_str_mv AT paladinojoanna improvingseriousillnesscommunicationaqualitativestudyofclinicalculture
AT sandersjustinj improvingseriousillnesscommunicationaqualitativestudyofclinicalculture
AT frommeerikk improvingseriousillnesscommunicationaqualitativestudyofclinicalculture
AT blocksusan improvingseriousillnesscommunicationaqualitativestudyofclinicalculture
AT jacobsenjulietc improvingseriousillnesscommunicationaqualitativestudyofclinicalculture
AT jacksonvickia improvingseriousillnesscommunicationaqualitativestudyofclinicalculture
AT ritchiechristines improvingseriousillnesscommunicationaqualitativestudyofclinicalculture
AT mitchellsuzanne improvingseriousillnesscommunicationaqualitativestudyofclinicalculture