Cargando…
Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE: Catheter-based techniques such as combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia which are sometimes indicated for obstetric anesthesia have a complex mechanism of action. The application of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) anesthesia for cesarean section (CS) has not been well investigated. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S415684 |
_version_ | 1785076527696707584 |
---|---|
author | Rao, Wan-Yi Xu, Fang Dai, Shao-Bing Mei, Zhong Chen, Xiao-Ping Lv, Chang-Cheng Liu, Chun-Lei Ngan Kee, Warwick Chen, Xin-Zhong |
author_facet | Rao, Wan-Yi Xu, Fang Dai, Shao-Bing Mei, Zhong Chen, Xiao-Ping Lv, Chang-Cheng Liu, Chun-Lei Ngan Kee, Warwick Chen, Xin-Zhong |
author_sort | Rao, Wan-Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Catheter-based techniques such as combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia which are sometimes indicated for obstetric anesthesia have a complex mechanism of action. The application of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) anesthesia for cesarean section (CS) has not been well investigated. The present study compared the relatively novel DPE technique with epidural (EA) and CSE anesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned 150 parturients who underwent elective CS to receive DPE, EA or CSE anesthesia. The primary outcome was the onset of sensory anesthesia to the T5 dermatome assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Secondary outcomes included median time to sensory block, quality of block, patient and surgeon satisfaction, APGAR scores and other side effects. RESULTS: For DPE anesthesia versus EA anesthesia, the onset of anesthesia was faster (hazard ratio 2.47 [95% CI 1.56 to 3.90], adjusted P < 0.001) and the median time to surgical level was shorter (16 [IQR 14–18] min versus 19 [15.5–21] min, adjusted P < 0.001); the incidence of intraoperative pain was lower (7/48 versus 17/47, adjusted P = 0.046) and the median patient satisfaction score was higher (9 [IQR 9–10] versus 8 [8–9.5], adjusted P = 0.004). In the CSE group, the onset of anesthesia was faster than in the other two but the incidence of hypotension was higher (P < 0.001) and the phenylephrine requirement was greater (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DPE anesthesia had a faster onset and better quality of block than EA anesthesia and provided less influence to maternal hemodynamic parameters than CSE anesthesia for CS. These results suggest that the dural puncture plays a significant role in enhancing the effectiveness of epidural top-ups during CSE anesthesia and indicates enlightenment that contributes to the satisfaction of anesthetic effect in DPE technique labor analgesia transferred to CS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10362875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103628752023-07-23 Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Rao, Wan-Yi Xu, Fang Dai, Shao-Bing Mei, Zhong Chen, Xiao-Ping Lv, Chang-Cheng Liu, Chun-Lei Ngan Kee, Warwick Chen, Xin-Zhong Drug Des Devel Ther Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: Catheter-based techniques such as combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia which are sometimes indicated for obstetric anesthesia have a complex mechanism of action. The application of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) anesthesia for cesarean section (CS) has not been well investigated. The present study compared the relatively novel DPE technique with epidural (EA) and CSE anesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned 150 parturients who underwent elective CS to receive DPE, EA or CSE anesthesia. The primary outcome was the onset of sensory anesthesia to the T5 dermatome assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Secondary outcomes included median time to sensory block, quality of block, patient and surgeon satisfaction, APGAR scores and other side effects. RESULTS: For DPE anesthesia versus EA anesthesia, the onset of anesthesia was faster (hazard ratio 2.47 [95% CI 1.56 to 3.90], adjusted P < 0.001) and the median time to surgical level was shorter (16 [IQR 14–18] min versus 19 [15.5–21] min, adjusted P < 0.001); the incidence of intraoperative pain was lower (7/48 versus 17/47, adjusted P = 0.046) and the median patient satisfaction score was higher (9 [IQR 9–10] versus 8 [8–9.5], adjusted P = 0.004). In the CSE group, the onset of anesthesia was faster than in the other two but the incidence of hypotension was higher (P < 0.001) and the phenylephrine requirement was greater (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DPE anesthesia had a faster onset and better quality of block than EA anesthesia and provided less influence to maternal hemodynamic parameters than CSE anesthesia for CS. These results suggest that the dural puncture plays a significant role in enhancing the effectiveness of epidural top-ups during CSE anesthesia and indicates enlightenment that contributes to the satisfaction of anesthetic effect in DPE technique labor analgesia transferred to CS. Dove 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10362875/ /pubmed/37484190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S415684 Text en © 2023 Rao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Report Rao, Wan-Yi Xu, Fang Dai, Shao-Bing Mei, Zhong Chen, Xiao-Ping Lv, Chang-Cheng Liu, Chun-Lei Ngan Kee, Warwick Chen, Xin-Zhong Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | comparison of dural puncture epidural, epidural and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Clinical Trial Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S415684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raowanyi comparisonofduralpunctureepiduralepiduralandcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xufang comparisonofduralpunctureepiduralepiduralandcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT daishaobing comparisonofduralpunctureepiduralepiduralandcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meizhong comparisonofduralpunctureepiduralepiduralandcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenxiaoping comparisonofduralpunctureepiduralepiduralandcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lvchangcheng comparisonofduralpunctureepiduralepiduralandcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liuchunlei comparisonofduralpunctureepiduralepiduralandcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ngankeewarwick comparisonofduralpunctureepiduralepiduralandcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenxinzhong comparisonofduralpunctureepiduralepiduralandcombinedspinalepiduralanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryarandomizedcontrolledtrial |