Cargando…

Bibliometric and Visual Analysis in the Field of Dry Needling for Myofascial Pain Syndrome from 2000 to 2022

BACKGROUND: Evidence has shown that dry needling (DN) is effective for myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). However, bibliometrics has rarely been used to analyze the literature related to DN for MPS. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic overview of global frontiers and research hotspots...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Ning, Li, Rongrong, Fu, Baitian, Zeng, Yichen, Fang, Jianqiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483409
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S417653
_version_ 1785076529363943424
author Luo, Ning
Li, Rongrong
Fu, Baitian
Zeng, Yichen
Fang, Jianqiao
author_facet Luo, Ning
Li, Rongrong
Fu, Baitian
Zeng, Yichen
Fang, Jianqiao
author_sort Luo, Ning
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence has shown that dry needling (DN) is effective for myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). However, bibliometrics has rarely been used to analyze the literature related to DN for MPS. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic overview of global frontiers and research hotspots of DN in the treatment of MPS from 2000 to 2022. METHODS: A search was conducted on Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) for literature on DN for MPS from 2000 to 2022. Based on the basic information provided by WoS CC, CiteSpace software was used to conduct bibliometric analysis of the countries, institutions, categories, journals, authors, references and keywords involved in this topic. RESULTS: A total of 458 papers were obtained, with the number of publications increasing over time. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies (31) was the most productive journal based on the number of publications, while Arch Phys Med Rehab (329) was the most co-cited journal. The most productive countries and institutions were USA (112) and Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (39), respectively. Fernandez-de-las-penas, Cesar has the highest number of publications (24) and Simons DG, who was an author with the highest number of citations (250). The article published by Gattie et al (co-citations: 65), and Mejuto-Vazquez et al (centrality: 0.36) were the most representative and symbolic. Based on the co-cited literature and keywords, myofascial trigger point, research methods, and acupuncture were the hot research topics and trends in the field. CONCLUSION: The current status and trends in clinical research of DN for MPS are revealed according to the results of this bibliometric study, which may facilitate researchers to identify hot topics and new directions for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10362881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103628812023-07-23 Bibliometric and Visual Analysis in the Field of Dry Needling for Myofascial Pain Syndrome from 2000 to 2022 Luo, Ning Li, Rongrong Fu, Baitian Zeng, Yichen Fang, Jianqiao J Pain Res Review BACKGROUND: Evidence has shown that dry needling (DN) is effective for myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). However, bibliometrics has rarely been used to analyze the literature related to DN for MPS. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic overview of global frontiers and research hotspots of DN in the treatment of MPS from 2000 to 2022. METHODS: A search was conducted on Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) for literature on DN for MPS from 2000 to 2022. Based on the basic information provided by WoS CC, CiteSpace software was used to conduct bibliometric analysis of the countries, institutions, categories, journals, authors, references and keywords involved in this topic. RESULTS: A total of 458 papers were obtained, with the number of publications increasing over time. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies (31) was the most productive journal based on the number of publications, while Arch Phys Med Rehab (329) was the most co-cited journal. The most productive countries and institutions were USA (112) and Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (39), respectively. Fernandez-de-las-penas, Cesar has the highest number of publications (24) and Simons DG, who was an author with the highest number of citations (250). The article published by Gattie et al (co-citations: 65), and Mejuto-Vazquez et al (centrality: 0.36) were the most representative and symbolic. Based on the co-cited literature and keywords, myofascial trigger point, research methods, and acupuncture were the hot research topics and trends in the field. CONCLUSION: The current status and trends in clinical research of DN for MPS are revealed according to the results of this bibliometric study, which may facilitate researchers to identify hot topics and new directions for future research. Dove 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10362881/ /pubmed/37483409 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S417653 Text en © 2023 Luo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Luo, Ning
Li, Rongrong
Fu, Baitian
Zeng, Yichen
Fang, Jianqiao
Bibliometric and Visual Analysis in the Field of Dry Needling for Myofascial Pain Syndrome from 2000 to 2022
title Bibliometric and Visual Analysis in the Field of Dry Needling for Myofascial Pain Syndrome from 2000 to 2022
title_full Bibliometric and Visual Analysis in the Field of Dry Needling for Myofascial Pain Syndrome from 2000 to 2022
title_fullStr Bibliometric and Visual Analysis in the Field of Dry Needling for Myofascial Pain Syndrome from 2000 to 2022
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometric and Visual Analysis in the Field of Dry Needling for Myofascial Pain Syndrome from 2000 to 2022
title_short Bibliometric and Visual Analysis in the Field of Dry Needling for Myofascial Pain Syndrome from 2000 to 2022
title_sort bibliometric and visual analysis in the field of dry needling for myofascial pain syndrome from 2000 to 2022
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10362881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483409
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S417653
work_keys_str_mv AT luoning bibliometricandvisualanalysisinthefieldofdryneedlingformyofascialpainsyndromefrom2000to2022
AT lirongrong bibliometricandvisualanalysisinthefieldofdryneedlingformyofascialpainsyndromefrom2000to2022
AT fubaitian bibliometricandvisualanalysisinthefieldofdryneedlingformyofascialpainsyndromefrom2000to2022
AT zengyichen bibliometricandvisualanalysisinthefieldofdryneedlingformyofascialpainsyndromefrom2000to2022
AT fangjianqiao bibliometricandvisualanalysisinthefieldofdryneedlingformyofascialpainsyndromefrom2000to2022