Cargando…

Phantom study on surgical performance in augmented reality laparoscopy

PURPOSE: Only a few studies have evaluated Augmented Reality (AR) in in vivo simulations compared to traditional laparoscopy; further research is especially needed regarding the most effective AR visualization technique. This pilot study aims to determine, under controlled conditions on a 3D-printed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heiliger, Christian, Heiliger, Thomas, Deodati, Alessandra, Winkler, Alexander, Grimm, Matthias, Kalim, Faisal, Esteban, Javier, Mihatsch, Lorenz, Hiendl, Lena, Andrade, Dorian, Frank, Alexander, Jacob, Sven, Mohamed, Khaled Ahmed, Solyanik, Olga, Mandal, Subhamoy, Werner, Jens, Eck, Ulrich, Navab, Nassir, Karcz, Konrad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36547767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02809-7
_version_ 1785076558111703040
author Heiliger, Christian
Heiliger, Thomas
Deodati, Alessandra
Winkler, Alexander
Grimm, Matthias
Kalim, Faisal
Esteban, Javier
Mihatsch, Lorenz
Hiendl, Lena
Andrade, Dorian
Frank, Alexander
Jacob, Sven
Mohamed, Khaled Ahmed
Solyanik, Olga
Mandal, Subhamoy
Werner, Jens
Eck, Ulrich
Navab, Nassir
Karcz, Konrad
author_facet Heiliger, Christian
Heiliger, Thomas
Deodati, Alessandra
Winkler, Alexander
Grimm, Matthias
Kalim, Faisal
Esteban, Javier
Mihatsch, Lorenz
Hiendl, Lena
Andrade, Dorian
Frank, Alexander
Jacob, Sven
Mohamed, Khaled Ahmed
Solyanik, Olga
Mandal, Subhamoy
Werner, Jens
Eck, Ulrich
Navab, Nassir
Karcz, Konrad
author_sort Heiliger, Christian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Only a few studies have evaluated Augmented Reality (AR) in in vivo simulations compared to traditional laparoscopy; further research is especially needed regarding the most effective AR visualization technique. This pilot study aims to determine, under controlled conditions on a 3D-printed phantom, whether an AR laparoscope improves surgical outcomes over conventional laparoscopy without augmentation. METHODS: We selected six surgical residents at a similar level of training and had them perform a laparoscopic task. The participants repeated the experiment three times, using different 3D phantoms and visualizations: Floating AR, Occlusion AR, and without any AR visualization (Control). Surgical performance was determined using objective measurements. Subjective measures, such as task load and potential application areas, were collected with questionnaires. RESULTS: Differences in operative time, total touching time, and SurgTLX scores showed no statistical significance ([Formula: see text] ). However, when assessing the invasiveness of the simulated intervention, the comparison revealed a statistically significant difference ([Formula: see text] ). Participants felt AR could be useful for various surgeries, especially for liver, sigmoid, and pancreatic resections (100%). Almost all participants agreed that AR could potentially lead to improved surgical parameters, such as operative time (83%), complication rate (83%), and identifying risk structures (83%). CONCLUSION: According to our results, AR may have great potential in visceral surgery and based on the objective measures of the study, may improve surgeons' performance in terms of an atraumatic approach. In this pilot study, participants consistently took more time to complete the task, had more contact with the vascular tree, were significantly more invasive, and scored higher on the SurgTLX survey than with AR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11548-022-02809-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10363058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103630582023-07-24 Phantom study on surgical performance in augmented reality laparoscopy Heiliger, Christian Heiliger, Thomas Deodati, Alessandra Winkler, Alexander Grimm, Matthias Kalim, Faisal Esteban, Javier Mihatsch, Lorenz Hiendl, Lena Andrade, Dorian Frank, Alexander Jacob, Sven Mohamed, Khaled Ahmed Solyanik, Olga Mandal, Subhamoy Werner, Jens Eck, Ulrich Navab, Nassir Karcz, Konrad Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Only a few studies have evaluated Augmented Reality (AR) in in vivo simulations compared to traditional laparoscopy; further research is especially needed regarding the most effective AR visualization technique. This pilot study aims to determine, under controlled conditions on a 3D-printed phantom, whether an AR laparoscope improves surgical outcomes over conventional laparoscopy without augmentation. METHODS: We selected six surgical residents at a similar level of training and had them perform a laparoscopic task. The participants repeated the experiment three times, using different 3D phantoms and visualizations: Floating AR, Occlusion AR, and without any AR visualization (Control). Surgical performance was determined using objective measurements. Subjective measures, such as task load and potential application areas, were collected with questionnaires. RESULTS: Differences in operative time, total touching time, and SurgTLX scores showed no statistical significance ([Formula: see text] ). However, when assessing the invasiveness of the simulated intervention, the comparison revealed a statistically significant difference ([Formula: see text] ). Participants felt AR could be useful for various surgeries, especially for liver, sigmoid, and pancreatic resections (100%). Almost all participants agreed that AR could potentially lead to improved surgical parameters, such as operative time (83%), complication rate (83%), and identifying risk structures (83%). CONCLUSION: According to our results, AR may have great potential in visceral surgery and based on the objective measures of the study, may improve surgeons' performance in terms of an atraumatic approach. In this pilot study, participants consistently took more time to complete the task, had more contact with the vascular tree, were significantly more invasive, and scored higher on the SurgTLX survey than with AR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11548-022-02809-7. Springer International Publishing 2022-12-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10363058/ /pubmed/36547767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02809-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Heiliger, Christian
Heiliger, Thomas
Deodati, Alessandra
Winkler, Alexander
Grimm, Matthias
Kalim, Faisal
Esteban, Javier
Mihatsch, Lorenz
Hiendl, Lena
Andrade, Dorian
Frank, Alexander
Jacob, Sven
Mohamed, Khaled Ahmed
Solyanik, Olga
Mandal, Subhamoy
Werner, Jens
Eck, Ulrich
Navab, Nassir
Karcz, Konrad
Phantom study on surgical performance in augmented reality laparoscopy
title Phantom study on surgical performance in augmented reality laparoscopy
title_full Phantom study on surgical performance in augmented reality laparoscopy
title_fullStr Phantom study on surgical performance in augmented reality laparoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Phantom study on surgical performance in augmented reality laparoscopy
title_short Phantom study on surgical performance in augmented reality laparoscopy
title_sort phantom study on surgical performance in augmented reality laparoscopy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36547767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02809-7
work_keys_str_mv AT heiligerchristian phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT heiligerthomas phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT deodatialessandra phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT winkleralexander phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT grimmmatthias phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT kalimfaisal phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT estebanjavier phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT mihatschlorenz phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT hiendllena phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT andradedorian phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT frankalexander phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT jacobsven phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT mohamedkhaledahmed phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT solyanikolga phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT mandalsubhamoy phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT wernerjens phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT eckulrich phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT navabnassir phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy
AT karczkonrad phantomstudyonsurgicalperformanceinaugmentedrealitylaparoscopy