Cargando…

Risk assessment for sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures using two methods of bone cement reinforcement

PURPOSE: Bone cement augmentation surgery includes percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP). In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk of sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures via PVP and PKP. METHODS: We perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Youzhi, Li, Lili, Lin, Xuelin, Zhang, Zhen, Zheng, Zhaoyun, Wang, Chengjiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37481567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04006-x
_version_ 1785076601532186624
author An, Youzhi
Li, Lili
Lin, Xuelin
Zhang, Zhen
Zheng, Zhaoyun
Wang, Chengjiang
author_facet An, Youzhi
Li, Lili
Lin, Xuelin
Zhang, Zhen
Zheng, Zhaoyun
Wang, Chengjiang
author_sort An, Youzhi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Bone cement augmentation surgery includes percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP). In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk of sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures via PVP and PKP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analytical study and included 61 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures who underwent PVP and PKP at the Spinal Surgery Department of The Second Hospital of Liaocheng Affiliated with Shandong First Medical University from January 2019 to January 2022. These patients were divided into the following two groups by simple random sampling: group A (N = 30) underwent PVP treatment and group B (N = 31) underwent PKP treatment. The surgical time, fluoroscopy frequency, visual analog scale (VAS) score, amount of bone cement, the leakage rate of bone cement in intervertebral space, Cobb angle, and the incidence of fractures in both groups of sandwich vertebral were recorded after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in terms of surgical time, fluoroscopy frequency, and VAS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, a statistically significant difference was found in terms of the amount of bone cement, the leakage rate of bone cement intervertebral space, Cobb angle, and the incidence of vertebral body fractures in both groups (P < 0.05). The amount of bone cement, the leakage rate of bone cement in intervertebral space, Cobb angle, and sandwich vertebral fractures were higher in Group A than in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: When PVP and PKP were performed to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, the sandwich vertebral exhibited a risk of fracture. PVP exhibited a greater relative risk than PKP, which may be due to the relatively larger amount of bone cement, higher rate of bone cement leakage in the intervertebral space, and larger Cobb angle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10363326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103633262023-07-24 Risk assessment for sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures using two methods of bone cement reinforcement An, Youzhi Li, Lili Lin, Xuelin Zhang, Zhen Zheng, Zhaoyun Wang, Chengjiang J Orthop Surg Res Research Article PURPOSE: Bone cement augmentation surgery includes percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP). In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk of sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures via PVP and PKP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analytical study and included 61 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures who underwent PVP and PKP at the Spinal Surgery Department of The Second Hospital of Liaocheng Affiliated with Shandong First Medical University from January 2019 to January 2022. These patients were divided into the following two groups by simple random sampling: group A (N = 30) underwent PVP treatment and group B (N = 31) underwent PKP treatment. The surgical time, fluoroscopy frequency, visual analog scale (VAS) score, amount of bone cement, the leakage rate of bone cement in intervertebral space, Cobb angle, and the incidence of fractures in both groups of sandwich vertebral were recorded after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in terms of surgical time, fluoroscopy frequency, and VAS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, a statistically significant difference was found in terms of the amount of bone cement, the leakage rate of bone cement intervertebral space, Cobb angle, and the incidence of vertebral body fractures in both groups (P < 0.05). The amount of bone cement, the leakage rate of bone cement in intervertebral space, Cobb angle, and sandwich vertebral fractures were higher in Group A than in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: When PVP and PKP were performed to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, the sandwich vertebral exhibited a risk of fracture. PVP exhibited a greater relative risk than PKP, which may be due to the relatively larger amount of bone cement, higher rate of bone cement leakage in the intervertebral space, and larger Cobb angle. BioMed Central 2023-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10363326/ /pubmed/37481567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04006-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
An, Youzhi
Li, Lili
Lin, Xuelin
Zhang, Zhen
Zheng, Zhaoyun
Wang, Chengjiang
Risk assessment for sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures using two methods of bone cement reinforcement
title Risk assessment for sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures using two methods of bone cement reinforcement
title_full Risk assessment for sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures using two methods of bone cement reinforcement
title_fullStr Risk assessment for sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures using two methods of bone cement reinforcement
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment for sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures using two methods of bone cement reinforcement
title_short Risk assessment for sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures using two methods of bone cement reinforcement
title_sort risk assessment for sandwich vertebral fractures in the treatment of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures using two methods of bone cement reinforcement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37481567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04006-x
work_keys_str_mv AT anyouzhi riskassessmentforsandwichvertebralfracturesinthetreatmentofosteoporosisvertebralcompressionfracturesusingtwomethodsofbonecementreinforcement
AT lilili riskassessmentforsandwichvertebralfracturesinthetreatmentofosteoporosisvertebralcompressionfracturesusingtwomethodsofbonecementreinforcement
AT linxuelin riskassessmentforsandwichvertebralfracturesinthetreatmentofosteoporosisvertebralcompressionfracturesusingtwomethodsofbonecementreinforcement
AT zhangzhen riskassessmentforsandwichvertebralfracturesinthetreatmentofosteoporosisvertebralcompressionfracturesusingtwomethodsofbonecementreinforcement
AT zhengzhaoyun riskassessmentforsandwichvertebralfracturesinthetreatmentofosteoporosisvertebralcompressionfracturesusingtwomethodsofbonecementreinforcement
AT wangchengjiang riskassessmentforsandwichvertebralfracturesinthetreatmentofosteoporosisvertebralcompressionfracturesusingtwomethodsofbonecementreinforcement