Cargando…
The fructose survival hypothesis for obesity
The fructose survival hypothesis proposes that obesity and metabolic disorders may have developed from over-stimulation of an evolutionary-based biologic response (survival switch) that aims to protect animals in advance of crisis. The response is characterized by hunger, thirst, foraging, weight ga...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37482773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0230 |
_version_ | 1785076689836965888 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Richard J. Lanaspa, Miguel A. Sanchez-Lozada, L. Gabriela Tolan, Dean Nakagawa, Takahiko Ishimoto, Takuji Andres-Hernando, Ana Rodriguez-Iturbe, Bernardo Stenvinkel, Peter |
author_facet | Johnson, Richard J. Lanaspa, Miguel A. Sanchez-Lozada, L. Gabriela Tolan, Dean Nakagawa, Takahiko Ishimoto, Takuji Andres-Hernando, Ana Rodriguez-Iturbe, Bernardo Stenvinkel, Peter |
author_sort | Johnson, Richard J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The fructose survival hypothesis proposes that obesity and metabolic disorders may have developed from over-stimulation of an evolutionary-based biologic response (survival switch) that aims to protect animals in advance of crisis. The response is characterized by hunger, thirst, foraging, weight gain, fat accumulation, insulin resistance, systemic inflammation and increased blood pressure. The process is initiated by the ingestion of fructose or by stimulating endogenous fructose production via the polyol pathway. Unlike other nutrients, fructose reduces the active energy (adenosine triphosphate) in the cell, while blocking its regeneration from fat stores. This is mediated by intracellular uric acid, mitochondrial oxidative stress, the inhibition of AMP kinase and stimulation of vasopressin. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is suppressed, and glycolysis stimulated. While this response is aimed to be modest and short-lived, the response in humans is exaggerated due to gain of ‘thrifty genes’ coupled with a western diet rich in foods that contain or generate fructose. We propose excessive fructose metabolism not only explains obesity but the epidemics of diabetes, hypertension, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity-associated cancers, vascular and Alzheimer's dementia, and even ageing. Moreover, the hypothesis unites current hypotheses on obesity. Reducing activation and/or blocking this pathway and stimulating mitochondrial regeneration may benefit health-span. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Causes of obesity: theories, conjectures and evidence (Part I)’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10363705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103637052023-07-25 The fructose survival hypothesis for obesity Johnson, Richard J. Lanaspa, Miguel A. Sanchez-Lozada, L. Gabriela Tolan, Dean Nakagawa, Takahiko Ishimoto, Takuji Andres-Hernando, Ana Rodriguez-Iturbe, Bernardo Stenvinkel, Peter Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles The fructose survival hypothesis proposes that obesity and metabolic disorders may have developed from over-stimulation of an evolutionary-based biologic response (survival switch) that aims to protect animals in advance of crisis. The response is characterized by hunger, thirst, foraging, weight gain, fat accumulation, insulin resistance, systemic inflammation and increased blood pressure. The process is initiated by the ingestion of fructose or by stimulating endogenous fructose production via the polyol pathway. Unlike other nutrients, fructose reduces the active energy (adenosine triphosphate) in the cell, while blocking its regeneration from fat stores. This is mediated by intracellular uric acid, mitochondrial oxidative stress, the inhibition of AMP kinase and stimulation of vasopressin. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is suppressed, and glycolysis stimulated. While this response is aimed to be modest and short-lived, the response in humans is exaggerated due to gain of ‘thrifty genes’ coupled with a western diet rich in foods that contain or generate fructose. We propose excessive fructose metabolism not only explains obesity but the epidemics of diabetes, hypertension, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity-associated cancers, vascular and Alzheimer's dementia, and even ageing. Moreover, the hypothesis unites current hypotheses on obesity. Reducing activation and/or blocking this pathway and stimulating mitochondrial regeneration may benefit health-span. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Causes of obesity: theories, conjectures and evidence (Part I)’. The Royal Society 2023-09-11 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10363705/ /pubmed/37482773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0230 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Johnson, Richard J. Lanaspa, Miguel A. Sanchez-Lozada, L. Gabriela Tolan, Dean Nakagawa, Takahiko Ishimoto, Takuji Andres-Hernando, Ana Rodriguez-Iturbe, Bernardo Stenvinkel, Peter The fructose survival hypothesis for obesity |
title | The fructose survival hypothesis for obesity |
title_full | The fructose survival hypothesis for obesity |
title_fullStr | The fructose survival hypothesis for obesity |
title_full_unstemmed | The fructose survival hypothesis for obesity |
title_short | The fructose survival hypothesis for obesity |
title_sort | fructose survival hypothesis for obesity |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37482773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonrichardj thefructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT lanaspamiguela thefructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT sanchezlozadalgabriela thefructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT tolandean thefructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT nakagawatakahiko thefructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT ishimototakuji thefructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT andreshernandoana thefructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT rodrigueziturbebernardo thefructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT stenvinkelpeter thefructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT johnsonrichardj fructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT lanaspamiguela fructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT sanchezlozadalgabriela fructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT tolandean fructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT nakagawatakahiko fructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT ishimototakuji fructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT andreshernandoana fructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT rodrigueziturbebernardo fructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity AT stenvinkelpeter fructosesurvivalhypothesisforobesity |