Cargando…
The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells
It is traditionally assumed that during cancer development, tumor cells abort their initially cooperative behavior (i.e., cheat) in favor of evolutionary strategies designed solely to enhance their own fitness (i.e., a “selfish” life style) at the expense of that of the multicellular organism. Howev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13571 |
_version_ | 1785076720803512320 |
---|---|
author | Capp, Jean‐Pascal Thomas, Frédéric Marusyk, Andriy M. Dujon, Antoine Tissot, Sophie Gatenby, Robert Roche, Benjamin Ujvari, Beata DeGregori, James Brown, Joel S. Nedelcu, Aurora M. |
author_facet | Capp, Jean‐Pascal Thomas, Frédéric Marusyk, Andriy M. Dujon, Antoine Tissot, Sophie Gatenby, Robert Roche, Benjamin Ujvari, Beata DeGregori, James Brown, Joel S. Nedelcu, Aurora M. |
author_sort | Capp, Jean‐Pascal |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is traditionally assumed that during cancer development, tumor cells abort their initially cooperative behavior (i.e., cheat) in favor of evolutionary strategies designed solely to enhance their own fitness (i.e., a “selfish” life style) at the expense of that of the multicellular organism. However, the growth and progress of solid tumors can also involve cooperation among these presumed selfish cells (which, by definition, should be noncooperative) and with stromal cells. The ultimate and proximate reasons behind this paradox are not fully understood. Here, in the light of current theories on the evolution of cooperation, we discuss the possible evolutionary mechanisms that could explain the apparent cooperative behaviors among selfish malignant cells. In addition to the most classical explanations for cooperation in cancer and in general (by‐product mutualism, kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, network reciprocity, group selection), we propose the idea that “greenbeard” effects are relevant to explaining some cooperative behaviors in cancer. Also, we discuss the possibility that malignant cooperative cells express or co‐opt cooperative traits normally expressed by healthy cells. We provide examples where considerations of these processes could help understand tumorigenesis and metastasis and argue that this framework provides novel insights into cancer biology and potential strategies for cancer prevention and treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10363833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103638332023-07-25 The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells Capp, Jean‐Pascal Thomas, Frédéric Marusyk, Andriy M. Dujon, Antoine Tissot, Sophie Gatenby, Robert Roche, Benjamin Ujvari, Beata DeGregori, James Brown, Joel S. Nedelcu, Aurora M. Evol Appl Review It is traditionally assumed that during cancer development, tumor cells abort their initially cooperative behavior (i.e., cheat) in favor of evolutionary strategies designed solely to enhance their own fitness (i.e., a “selfish” life style) at the expense of that of the multicellular organism. However, the growth and progress of solid tumors can also involve cooperation among these presumed selfish cells (which, by definition, should be noncooperative) and with stromal cells. The ultimate and proximate reasons behind this paradox are not fully understood. Here, in the light of current theories on the evolution of cooperation, we discuss the possible evolutionary mechanisms that could explain the apparent cooperative behaviors among selfish malignant cells. In addition to the most classical explanations for cooperation in cancer and in general (by‐product mutualism, kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, network reciprocity, group selection), we propose the idea that “greenbeard” effects are relevant to explaining some cooperative behaviors in cancer. Also, we discuss the possibility that malignant cooperative cells express or co‐opt cooperative traits normally expressed by healthy cells. We provide examples where considerations of these processes could help understand tumorigenesis and metastasis and argue that this framework provides novel insights into cancer biology and potential strategies for cancer prevention and treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10363833/ /pubmed/37492150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13571 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Capp, Jean‐Pascal Thomas, Frédéric Marusyk, Andriy M. Dujon, Antoine Tissot, Sophie Gatenby, Robert Roche, Benjamin Ujvari, Beata DeGregori, James Brown, Joel S. Nedelcu, Aurora M. The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells |
title | The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells |
title_full | The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells |
title_fullStr | The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells |
title_full_unstemmed | The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells |
title_short | The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells |
title_sort | paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cappjeanpascal theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT thomasfrederic theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT marusykandriy theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT mdujonantoine theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT tissotsophie theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT gatenbyrobert theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT rochebenjamin theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT ujvaribeata theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT degregorijames theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT brownjoels theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT nedelcuauroram theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT cappjeanpascal paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT thomasfrederic paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT marusykandriy paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT mdujonantoine paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT tissotsophie paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT gatenbyrobert paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT rochebenjamin paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT ujvaribeata paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT degregorijames paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT brownjoels paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells AT nedelcuauroram paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells |