Cargando…

The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells

It is traditionally assumed that during cancer development, tumor cells abort their initially cooperative behavior (i.e., cheat) in favor of evolutionary strategies designed solely to enhance their own fitness (i.e., a “selfish” life style) at the expense of that of the multicellular organism. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capp, Jean‐Pascal, Thomas, Frédéric, Marusyk, Andriy, M. Dujon, Antoine, Tissot, Sophie, Gatenby, Robert, Roche, Benjamin, Ujvari, Beata, DeGregori, James, Brown, Joel S., Nedelcu, Aurora M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13571
_version_ 1785076720803512320
author Capp, Jean‐Pascal
Thomas, Frédéric
Marusyk, Andriy
M. Dujon, Antoine
Tissot, Sophie
Gatenby, Robert
Roche, Benjamin
Ujvari, Beata
DeGregori, James
Brown, Joel S.
Nedelcu, Aurora M.
author_facet Capp, Jean‐Pascal
Thomas, Frédéric
Marusyk, Andriy
M. Dujon, Antoine
Tissot, Sophie
Gatenby, Robert
Roche, Benjamin
Ujvari, Beata
DeGregori, James
Brown, Joel S.
Nedelcu, Aurora M.
author_sort Capp, Jean‐Pascal
collection PubMed
description It is traditionally assumed that during cancer development, tumor cells abort their initially cooperative behavior (i.e., cheat) in favor of evolutionary strategies designed solely to enhance their own fitness (i.e., a “selfish” life style) at the expense of that of the multicellular organism. However, the growth and progress of solid tumors can also involve cooperation among these presumed selfish cells (which, by definition, should be noncooperative) and with stromal cells. The ultimate and proximate reasons behind this paradox are not fully understood. Here, in the light of current theories on the evolution of cooperation, we discuss the possible evolutionary mechanisms that could explain the apparent cooperative behaviors among selfish malignant cells. In addition to the most classical explanations for cooperation in cancer and in general (by‐product mutualism, kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, network reciprocity, group selection), we propose the idea that “greenbeard” effects are relevant to explaining some cooperative behaviors in cancer. Also, we discuss the possibility that malignant cooperative cells express or co‐opt cooperative traits normally expressed by healthy cells. We provide examples where considerations of these processes could help understand tumorigenesis and metastasis and argue that this framework provides novel insights into cancer biology and potential strategies for cancer prevention and treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10363833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103638332023-07-25 The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells Capp, Jean‐Pascal Thomas, Frédéric Marusyk, Andriy M. Dujon, Antoine Tissot, Sophie Gatenby, Robert Roche, Benjamin Ujvari, Beata DeGregori, James Brown, Joel S. Nedelcu, Aurora M. Evol Appl Review It is traditionally assumed that during cancer development, tumor cells abort their initially cooperative behavior (i.e., cheat) in favor of evolutionary strategies designed solely to enhance their own fitness (i.e., a “selfish” life style) at the expense of that of the multicellular organism. However, the growth and progress of solid tumors can also involve cooperation among these presumed selfish cells (which, by definition, should be noncooperative) and with stromal cells. The ultimate and proximate reasons behind this paradox are not fully understood. Here, in the light of current theories on the evolution of cooperation, we discuss the possible evolutionary mechanisms that could explain the apparent cooperative behaviors among selfish malignant cells. In addition to the most classical explanations for cooperation in cancer and in general (by‐product mutualism, kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, network reciprocity, group selection), we propose the idea that “greenbeard” effects are relevant to explaining some cooperative behaviors in cancer. Also, we discuss the possibility that malignant cooperative cells express or co‐opt cooperative traits normally expressed by healthy cells. We provide examples where considerations of these processes could help understand tumorigenesis and metastasis and argue that this framework provides novel insights into cancer biology and potential strategies for cancer prevention and treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10363833/ /pubmed/37492150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13571 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Capp, Jean‐Pascal
Thomas, Frédéric
Marusyk, Andriy
M. Dujon, Antoine
Tissot, Sophie
Gatenby, Robert
Roche, Benjamin
Ujvari, Beata
DeGregori, James
Brown, Joel S.
Nedelcu, Aurora M.
The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells
title The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells
title_full The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells
title_fullStr The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells
title_full_unstemmed The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells
title_short The paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells
title_sort paradox of cooperation among selfish cancer cells
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13571
work_keys_str_mv AT cappjeanpascal theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT thomasfrederic theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT marusykandriy theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT mdujonantoine theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT tissotsophie theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT gatenbyrobert theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT rochebenjamin theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT ujvaribeata theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT degregorijames theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT brownjoels theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT nedelcuauroram theparadoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT cappjeanpascal paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT thomasfrederic paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT marusykandriy paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT mdujonantoine paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT tissotsophie paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT gatenbyrobert paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT rochebenjamin paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT ujvaribeata paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT degregorijames paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT brownjoels paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells
AT nedelcuauroram paradoxofcooperationamongselfishcancercells