Cargando…

Implementation and maintenance of an enhanced pulmonary rehabilitation program in a single centre: An implementation study

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has major benefits for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An enhanced PR program was developed with a self-management education intervention. The objective of our study was to evaluate the implementation of the enhanced PR program in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Braak, Kim, Wald, Joshua, Tansey, Catherine M, Paes, Thais, Sedeno, Maria, Selzler, Anne-Marie, Stickland, Michael K, Bourbeau, Jean, Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37471305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14799731231179105
_version_ 1785076738461532160
author van der Braak, Kim
Wald, Joshua
Tansey, Catherine M
Paes, Thais
Sedeno, Maria
Selzler, Anne-Marie
Stickland, Michael K
Bourbeau, Jean
Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania
author_facet van der Braak, Kim
Wald, Joshua
Tansey, Catherine M
Paes, Thais
Sedeno, Maria
Selzler, Anne-Marie
Stickland, Michael K
Bourbeau, Jean
Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania
author_sort van der Braak, Kim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has major benefits for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An enhanced PR program was developed with a self-management education intervention. The objective of our study was to evaluate the implementation of the enhanced PR program into a single centre. METHODS: Pre-post implementation study consisted of two evaluation periods: immediately after implementation and 18 months later. Guided by the RE-AIM framework, outcomes included: Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. RESULTS: Reach: 70–75% of referred patients agreed to a PR program (n = 26). Effectiveness: Clinically important improvements occurred in some patients in functional exercise capacity (64% of the patients achieved clinical important difference in 6-min walk test in the first evaluation period and 44% in the second evaluation period), knowledge, functional status, and self-efficacy in both evaluation periods. Adoption: All healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in PR (n = 8) participated. Implementation: Fidelity for the group education sessions ranged from 76 to 95% (first evaluation) and from 82 to 88% (second evaluation). Maintenance: The program was sustained over 18 months with minor changes. Patients and HCPs were highly satisfied with the program. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced PR program was accepted by patients and HCPs and was implemented and maintained at a single expert center with good implementation fidelity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10363903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103639032023-07-25 Implementation and maintenance of an enhanced pulmonary rehabilitation program in a single centre: An implementation study van der Braak, Kim Wald, Joshua Tansey, Catherine M Paes, Thais Sedeno, Maria Selzler, Anne-Marie Stickland, Michael K Bourbeau, Jean Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania Chron Respir Dis Original Paper BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has major benefits for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An enhanced PR program was developed with a self-management education intervention. The objective of our study was to evaluate the implementation of the enhanced PR program into a single centre. METHODS: Pre-post implementation study consisted of two evaluation periods: immediately after implementation and 18 months later. Guided by the RE-AIM framework, outcomes included: Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. RESULTS: Reach: 70–75% of referred patients agreed to a PR program (n = 26). Effectiveness: Clinically important improvements occurred in some patients in functional exercise capacity (64% of the patients achieved clinical important difference in 6-min walk test in the first evaluation period and 44% in the second evaluation period), knowledge, functional status, and self-efficacy in both evaluation periods. Adoption: All healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in PR (n = 8) participated. Implementation: Fidelity for the group education sessions ranged from 76 to 95% (first evaluation) and from 82 to 88% (second evaluation). Maintenance: The program was sustained over 18 months with minor changes. Patients and HCPs were highly satisfied with the program. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced PR program was accepted by patients and HCPs and was implemented and maintained at a single expert center with good implementation fidelity. SAGE Publications 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10363903/ /pubmed/37471305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14799731231179105 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Paper
van der Braak, Kim
Wald, Joshua
Tansey, Catherine M
Paes, Thais
Sedeno, Maria
Selzler, Anne-Marie
Stickland, Michael K
Bourbeau, Jean
Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania
Implementation and maintenance of an enhanced pulmonary rehabilitation program in a single centre: An implementation study
title Implementation and maintenance of an enhanced pulmonary rehabilitation program in a single centre: An implementation study
title_full Implementation and maintenance of an enhanced pulmonary rehabilitation program in a single centre: An implementation study
title_fullStr Implementation and maintenance of an enhanced pulmonary rehabilitation program in a single centre: An implementation study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and maintenance of an enhanced pulmonary rehabilitation program in a single centre: An implementation study
title_short Implementation and maintenance of an enhanced pulmonary rehabilitation program in a single centre: An implementation study
title_sort implementation and maintenance of an enhanced pulmonary rehabilitation program in a single centre: an implementation study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10363903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37471305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14799731231179105
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderbraakkim implementationandmaintenanceofanenhancedpulmonaryrehabilitationprograminasinglecentreanimplementationstudy
AT waldjoshua implementationandmaintenanceofanenhancedpulmonaryrehabilitationprograminasinglecentreanimplementationstudy
AT tanseycatherinem implementationandmaintenanceofanenhancedpulmonaryrehabilitationprograminasinglecentreanimplementationstudy
AT paesthais implementationandmaintenanceofanenhancedpulmonaryrehabilitationprograminasinglecentreanimplementationstudy
AT sedenomaria implementationandmaintenanceofanenhancedpulmonaryrehabilitationprograminasinglecentreanimplementationstudy
AT selzlerannemarie implementationandmaintenanceofanenhancedpulmonaryrehabilitationprograminasinglecentreanimplementationstudy
AT sticklandmichaelk implementationandmaintenanceofanenhancedpulmonaryrehabilitationprograminasinglecentreanimplementationstudy
AT bourbeaujean implementationandmaintenanceofanenhancedpulmonaryrehabilitationprograminasinglecentreanimplementationstudy
AT janaudisferreiratania implementationandmaintenanceofanenhancedpulmonaryrehabilitationprograminasinglecentreanimplementationstudy