Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in Nordic countries: nationwide cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of the bivalent mRNA booster vaccines containing the original SARS-CoV-2 and omicron BA.4-5 or BA.1 subvariants as the fourth dose against severe covid-19. DESIGN: Nationwide cohort analyses, using target trial emulation. SETTING: Denmark, Finland, Norway, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-075286 |
_version_ | 1785076798872092672 |
---|---|
author | Andersson, Niklas Worm Thiesson, Emilia Myrup Baum, Ulrike Pihlström, Nicklas Starrfelt, Jostein Faksová, Kristýna Poukka, Eero Meijerink, Hinta Ljung, Rickard Hviid, Anders |
author_facet | Andersson, Niklas Worm Thiesson, Emilia Myrup Baum, Ulrike Pihlström, Nicklas Starrfelt, Jostein Faksová, Kristýna Poukka, Eero Meijerink, Hinta Ljung, Rickard Hviid, Anders |
author_sort | Andersson, Niklas Worm |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of the bivalent mRNA booster vaccines containing the original SARS-CoV-2 and omicron BA.4-5 or BA.1 subvariants as the fourth dose against severe covid-19. DESIGN: Nationwide cohort analyses, using target trial emulation. SETTING: Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, from 1 July 2022 to 10 April 2023. PARTICIPANTS: People aged ≥50 years who had received at least three doses of covid-19 vaccine (that is, a primary course and a first booster). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to compare the risk of hospital admission and death related to covid-19 in people who received a bivalent Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) or Spikevax (Moderna) BA.4-5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccine as a fourth dose (second booster) with three dose (first booster) vaccinated people and between four dose vaccinated people. RESULTS: A total of 1 634 199 people receiving bivalent BA.4-5 fourth dose booster and 1 042 124 receiving bivalent BA.1 fourth dose booster across the four Nordic countries were included. Receipt of a bivalent BA.4-5 booster as a fourth dose was associated with a comparative vaccine effectiveness against admission to hospital with covid-19 of 67.8% (95% confidence interval 63.1% to 72.5%) and a risk difference of –91.9 (95% confidence interval –152.4 to –31.4) per 100 000 people at three months of follow-up compared with having received three doses of vaccine (289 v 893 events). The corresponding comparative vaccine effectiveness and risk difference for bivalent BA.1 boosters (332 v 977 events) were 65.8% (59.1% to 72.4%) and –112.9 (–179.6 to –46.2) per 100 000, respectively. Comparative vaccine effectiveness and risk difference against covid-19 related death were 69.8% (52.8% to 86.8%) and –34.1 (–40.1 to –28.2) per 100 000 for bivalent BA.4-5 booster (93 v 325 events) and 70.0% (50.3% to 89.7%) and –38.7 (–65.4 to –12.0) per 100 000 for BA.1 booster (86 v 286) as a fourth dose. Comparing bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 boosters as a fourth dose directly resulted in a three month comparative vaccine effectiveness and corresponding risk difference of –14.9% (–62.3% to 32.4%) and 10.0 (–14.4 to 34.4) per 100 000 people for admission to hospital with covid-19 (802 v 932 unweighted events) and –40.7% (–123.4% to 42.1%) and 8.1 (–3.3 to 19.4) per 100 000 for covid-19 related death (229 v 243 unweighted events). The comparative vaccine effectiveness did not differ across sex and age (</≥70 years) and seemed to be sustained up to six months from the day of vaccination with modest waning. CONCLUSION: Vaccination with bivalent BA.4-5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines as a fourth dose was associated with reduced rates of covid-19 related hospital admission and death among adults aged ≥50 years. The protection afforded by the bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 boosters did not differ significantly when directly compared, and any potential difference would most likely be very small in absolute numbers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10364194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103641942023-07-25 Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in Nordic countries: nationwide cohort study Andersson, Niklas Worm Thiesson, Emilia Myrup Baum, Ulrike Pihlström, Nicklas Starrfelt, Jostein Faksová, Kristýna Poukka, Eero Meijerink, Hinta Ljung, Rickard Hviid, Anders BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of the bivalent mRNA booster vaccines containing the original SARS-CoV-2 and omicron BA.4-5 or BA.1 subvariants as the fourth dose against severe covid-19. DESIGN: Nationwide cohort analyses, using target trial emulation. SETTING: Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, from 1 July 2022 to 10 April 2023. PARTICIPANTS: People aged ≥50 years who had received at least three doses of covid-19 vaccine (that is, a primary course and a first booster). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to compare the risk of hospital admission and death related to covid-19 in people who received a bivalent Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) or Spikevax (Moderna) BA.4-5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccine as a fourth dose (second booster) with three dose (first booster) vaccinated people and between four dose vaccinated people. RESULTS: A total of 1 634 199 people receiving bivalent BA.4-5 fourth dose booster and 1 042 124 receiving bivalent BA.1 fourth dose booster across the four Nordic countries were included. Receipt of a bivalent BA.4-5 booster as a fourth dose was associated with a comparative vaccine effectiveness against admission to hospital with covid-19 of 67.8% (95% confidence interval 63.1% to 72.5%) and a risk difference of –91.9 (95% confidence interval –152.4 to –31.4) per 100 000 people at three months of follow-up compared with having received three doses of vaccine (289 v 893 events). The corresponding comparative vaccine effectiveness and risk difference for bivalent BA.1 boosters (332 v 977 events) were 65.8% (59.1% to 72.4%) and –112.9 (–179.6 to –46.2) per 100 000, respectively. Comparative vaccine effectiveness and risk difference against covid-19 related death were 69.8% (52.8% to 86.8%) and –34.1 (–40.1 to –28.2) per 100 000 for bivalent BA.4-5 booster (93 v 325 events) and 70.0% (50.3% to 89.7%) and –38.7 (–65.4 to –12.0) per 100 000 for BA.1 booster (86 v 286) as a fourth dose. Comparing bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 boosters as a fourth dose directly resulted in a three month comparative vaccine effectiveness and corresponding risk difference of –14.9% (–62.3% to 32.4%) and 10.0 (–14.4 to 34.4) per 100 000 people for admission to hospital with covid-19 (802 v 932 unweighted events) and –40.7% (–123.4% to 42.1%) and 8.1 (–3.3 to 19.4) per 100 000 for covid-19 related death (229 v 243 unweighted events). The comparative vaccine effectiveness did not differ across sex and age (</≥70 years) and seemed to be sustained up to six months from the day of vaccination with modest waning. CONCLUSION: Vaccination with bivalent BA.4-5 or BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines as a fourth dose was associated with reduced rates of covid-19 related hospital admission and death among adults aged ≥50 years. The protection afforded by the bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 boosters did not differ significantly when directly compared, and any potential difference would most likely be very small in absolute numbers. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10364194/ /pubmed/37491022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-075286 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Andersson, Niklas Worm Thiesson, Emilia Myrup Baum, Ulrike Pihlström, Nicklas Starrfelt, Jostein Faksová, Kristýna Poukka, Eero Meijerink, Hinta Ljung, Rickard Hviid, Anders Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in Nordic countries: nationwide cohort study |
title | Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in Nordic countries: nationwide cohort study |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in Nordic countries: nationwide cohort study |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in Nordic countries: nationwide cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in Nordic countries: nationwide cohort study |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in Nordic countries: nationwide cohort study |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of bivalent ba.4-5 and ba.1 mrna booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in nordic countries: nationwide cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-075286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anderssonniklasworm comparativeeffectivenessofbivalentba45andba1mrnaboostervaccinesamongadultsaged50yearsinnordiccountriesnationwidecohortstudy AT thiessonemiliamyrup comparativeeffectivenessofbivalentba45andba1mrnaboostervaccinesamongadultsaged50yearsinnordiccountriesnationwidecohortstudy AT baumulrike comparativeeffectivenessofbivalentba45andba1mrnaboostervaccinesamongadultsaged50yearsinnordiccountriesnationwidecohortstudy AT pihlstromnicklas comparativeeffectivenessofbivalentba45andba1mrnaboostervaccinesamongadultsaged50yearsinnordiccountriesnationwidecohortstudy AT starrfeltjostein comparativeeffectivenessofbivalentba45andba1mrnaboostervaccinesamongadultsaged50yearsinnordiccountriesnationwidecohortstudy AT faksovakristyna comparativeeffectivenessofbivalentba45andba1mrnaboostervaccinesamongadultsaged50yearsinnordiccountriesnationwidecohortstudy AT poukkaeero comparativeeffectivenessofbivalentba45andba1mrnaboostervaccinesamongadultsaged50yearsinnordiccountriesnationwidecohortstudy AT meijerinkhinta comparativeeffectivenessofbivalentba45andba1mrnaboostervaccinesamongadultsaged50yearsinnordiccountriesnationwidecohortstudy AT ljungrickard comparativeeffectivenessofbivalentba45andba1mrnaboostervaccinesamongadultsaged50yearsinnordiccountriesnationwidecohortstudy AT hviidanders comparativeeffectivenessofbivalentba45andba1mrnaboostervaccinesamongadultsaged50yearsinnordiccountriesnationwidecohortstudy |