Cargando…
Quantification of Celiac Disease Severity Using Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Comparison of Human Experts and Machine Learning Algorithms
BACKGROUND: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is an attractive method for diagnosing and objectively monitoring disease activity in celiac disease (CeD). Its use, facilitated by artificial intelligence-based tools, may allow computer-assisted interpretation of VCE studies, transforming a subjective test...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Science Publishers
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405619666230123110957 |
_version_ | 1785076823582834688 |
---|---|
author | Zammit, Stefania Chetcuti McAlindon, Mark E. Greenblatt, Elliot Maker, Michael Siegelman, Jenifer Leffler, Daniel A. Yardibi, Ozlem Raunig, David Brown, Terry Sidhu, Reena |
author_facet | Zammit, Stefania Chetcuti McAlindon, Mark E. Greenblatt, Elliot Maker, Michael Siegelman, Jenifer Leffler, Daniel A. Yardibi, Ozlem Raunig, David Brown, Terry Sidhu, Reena |
author_sort | Zammit, Stefania Chetcuti |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is an attractive method for diagnosing and objectively monitoring disease activity in celiac disease (CeD). Its use, facilitated by artificial intelligence-based tools, may allow computer-assisted interpretation of VCE studies, transforming a subjective test into a quantitative and reproducible measurement tool. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare objective CeD severity assessment as determined with VCE by expert human readers and a machine learning algorithm (MLA). METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years with histologically proven CeD underwent VCE. Examination frames were scored by three readers from one center and the MLA, using a 4-point ordinal scale for assessing the severity of CeD enteropathy. After scoring, curves representing CeD severity across the entire small intestine (SI) and individual tertiles (proximal, mid, and distal) were fitted for each reader and the MLA. All comparisons used Krippendorff’s alpha; values > 0.8 represent excellent to ‘almost perfect’ inter-reader agreement. RESULTS: VCEs from 63 patients were scored. Readers demonstrated strong inter-reader agreement on celiac villous damage (alpha=0.924), and mean value reader curves showed similarly excellent agreement with MLA curves (alpha=0.935). Average reader and MLA curves were comparable for mean and maximum values for the first SI tertile (alphas=0.932 and 0.867, respectively) and the mean value over the entire SI (alpha=0.945). CONCLUSION: A novel MLA demonstrated excellent agreement on whole SI imaging with three expert gastroenterologists. An ordinal scale permitted high inter-reader agreement, accurately and reliably replicated by the MLA. Interpreting VCEs using MLAs may allow automated diagnosis and disease burden assessment in CeD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10364343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Bentham Science Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103643432023-07-25 Quantification of Celiac Disease Severity Using Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Comparison of Human Experts and Machine Learning Algorithms Zammit, Stefania Chetcuti McAlindon, Mark E. Greenblatt, Elliot Maker, Michael Siegelman, Jenifer Leffler, Daniel A. Yardibi, Ozlem Raunig, David Brown, Terry Sidhu, Reena Curr Med Imaging Life Sciences, Systems Biology & Bioinformatics, BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS, MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY BACKGROUND: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is an attractive method for diagnosing and objectively monitoring disease activity in celiac disease (CeD). Its use, facilitated by artificial intelligence-based tools, may allow computer-assisted interpretation of VCE studies, transforming a subjective test into a quantitative and reproducible measurement tool. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare objective CeD severity assessment as determined with VCE by expert human readers and a machine learning algorithm (MLA). METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years with histologically proven CeD underwent VCE. Examination frames were scored by three readers from one center and the MLA, using a 4-point ordinal scale for assessing the severity of CeD enteropathy. After scoring, curves representing CeD severity across the entire small intestine (SI) and individual tertiles (proximal, mid, and distal) were fitted for each reader and the MLA. All comparisons used Krippendorff’s alpha; values > 0.8 represent excellent to ‘almost perfect’ inter-reader agreement. RESULTS: VCEs from 63 patients were scored. Readers demonstrated strong inter-reader agreement on celiac villous damage (alpha=0.924), and mean value reader curves showed similarly excellent agreement with MLA curves (alpha=0.935). Average reader and MLA curves were comparable for mean and maximum values for the first SI tertile (alphas=0.932 and 0.867, respectively) and the mean value over the entire SI (alpha=0.945). CONCLUSION: A novel MLA demonstrated excellent agreement on whole SI imaging with three expert gastroenterologists. An ordinal scale permitted high inter-reader agreement, accurately and reliably replicated by the MLA. Interpreting VCEs using MLAs may allow automated diagnosis and disease burden assessment in CeD. Bentham Science Publishers 2023-06-02 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10364343/ /pubmed/36694320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405619666230123110957 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Life Sciences, Systems Biology & Bioinformatics, BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS, MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Zammit, Stefania Chetcuti McAlindon, Mark E. Greenblatt, Elliot Maker, Michael Siegelman, Jenifer Leffler, Daniel A. Yardibi, Ozlem Raunig, David Brown, Terry Sidhu, Reena Quantification of Celiac Disease Severity Using Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Comparison of Human Experts and Machine Learning Algorithms |
title | Quantification of Celiac Disease Severity Using Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Comparison of Human Experts and Machine Learning Algorithms |
title_full | Quantification of Celiac Disease Severity Using Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Comparison of Human Experts and Machine Learning Algorithms |
title_fullStr | Quantification of Celiac Disease Severity Using Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Comparison of Human Experts and Machine Learning Algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of Celiac Disease Severity Using Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Comparison of Human Experts and Machine Learning Algorithms |
title_short | Quantification of Celiac Disease Severity Using Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Comparison of Human Experts and Machine Learning Algorithms |
title_sort | quantification of celiac disease severity using video capsule endoscopy: a comparison of human experts and machine learning algorithms |
topic | Life Sciences, Systems Biology & Bioinformatics, BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS, MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405619666230123110957 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zammitstefaniachetcuti quantificationofceliacdiseaseseverityusingvideocapsuleendoscopyacomparisonofhumanexpertsandmachinelearningalgorithms AT mcalindonmarke quantificationofceliacdiseaseseverityusingvideocapsuleendoscopyacomparisonofhumanexpertsandmachinelearningalgorithms AT greenblattelliot quantificationofceliacdiseaseseverityusingvideocapsuleendoscopyacomparisonofhumanexpertsandmachinelearningalgorithms AT makermichael quantificationofceliacdiseaseseverityusingvideocapsuleendoscopyacomparisonofhumanexpertsandmachinelearningalgorithms AT siegelmanjenifer quantificationofceliacdiseaseseverityusingvideocapsuleendoscopyacomparisonofhumanexpertsandmachinelearningalgorithms AT lefflerdaniela quantificationofceliacdiseaseseverityusingvideocapsuleendoscopyacomparisonofhumanexpertsandmachinelearningalgorithms AT yardibiozlem quantificationofceliacdiseaseseverityusingvideocapsuleendoscopyacomparisonofhumanexpertsandmachinelearningalgorithms AT raunigdavid quantificationofceliacdiseaseseverityusingvideocapsuleendoscopyacomparisonofhumanexpertsandmachinelearningalgorithms AT brownterry quantificationofceliacdiseaseseverityusingvideocapsuleendoscopyacomparisonofhumanexpertsandmachinelearningalgorithms AT sidhureena quantificationofceliacdiseaseseverityusingvideocapsuleendoscopyacomparisonofhumanexpertsandmachinelearningalgorithms |