Cargando…

Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote extubation success in critically ill adults on intensive care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial

BACKGROUND: Extubation failure, defined as reintubation within 48 h, is associated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and higher mortality risk. One cause of extubation failure is secretion retention, resulting from an inability to cough effectively. Mechanical insufflation-exsu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swingwood, Ema, Voss, Sarah, Tume, Lyvonne N., Bewley, Jeremy, Turner, Nicholas, Ntoumenopoulos, George, Rose, Louise, Cramp, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01362-7
_version_ 1785076839679524864
author Swingwood, Ema
Voss, Sarah
Tume, Lyvonne N.
Bewley, Jeremy
Turner, Nicholas
Ntoumenopoulos, George
Rose, Louise
Cramp, Fiona
author_facet Swingwood, Ema
Voss, Sarah
Tume, Lyvonne N.
Bewley, Jeremy
Turner, Nicholas
Ntoumenopoulos, George
Rose, Louise
Cramp, Fiona
author_sort Swingwood, Ema
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extubation failure, defined as reintubation within 48 h, is associated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and higher mortality risk. One cause of extubation failure is secretion retention, resulting from an inability to cough effectively. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) simulates a cough aiding secretion clearance. However, MI-E is not routinely used in the ICU for invasively ventilated patients. This study aims to determine feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining MI-E use to promote extubation success in intubated, ventilated adults. METHODS: It is a single-centre, feasibility RCT with semi-structured interviews, economic scoping, and exploratory physiology study. The feasibility RCT (n = 50) will compare standard care to a MI-E protocol including a minimum of two MI-E sessions via the endotracheal tube prior to extubation. Post-extubation, MI-E will be delivered via facemask or mouthpiece up to two times/day for 48 h. MI-E settings will be individualised. All patients will receive standard care (no MI-E) in relation to mechanical ventilation, weaning, rehabilitation, physiotherapy techniques such as positioning, manual airway clearance techniques, manual/ventilator hyperinflation, endotracheal suctioning, and nebulisation. Clinical data collection will occur before, on completion, and 5-min post-physiotherapy sessions (intervention/control arms). Resource use will be calculated for each 24-h period. Analyses will be descriptive and address feasibility outcomes including participant recruitment and attrition, proportion of MI-E treatment sessions completed, dataset completeness, and frequency of adverse events and acceptability. Semi-structured online interviews informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) with patients, clinicians, and family members will explore the acceptability of the MI-E intervention and study processes. Interview data will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis based on TFA domains through first-level coding. The embedded physiology study will use electrical impedance tomography and lung ultrasound to explore lung recruitment and de-recruitment during MI-E in a subset of 5–10 patients. DISCUSSION: This study will examine feasibility and acceptability of a RCT protocol of MI-E to promote extubation success. Study findings will inform design modification and conduct of a future adequately powered trial. Furthermore, the study will contribute and advance the understanding of MI-E use in critically ill intubated adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 24603037; IRAS 303674 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01362-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10364411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103644112023-07-25 Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote extubation success in critically ill adults on intensive care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial Swingwood, Ema Voss, Sarah Tume, Lyvonne N. Bewley, Jeremy Turner, Nicholas Ntoumenopoulos, George Rose, Louise Cramp, Fiona Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Extubation failure, defined as reintubation within 48 h, is associated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and higher mortality risk. One cause of extubation failure is secretion retention, resulting from an inability to cough effectively. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) simulates a cough aiding secretion clearance. However, MI-E is not routinely used in the ICU for invasively ventilated patients. This study aims to determine feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining MI-E use to promote extubation success in intubated, ventilated adults. METHODS: It is a single-centre, feasibility RCT with semi-structured interviews, economic scoping, and exploratory physiology study. The feasibility RCT (n = 50) will compare standard care to a MI-E protocol including a minimum of two MI-E sessions via the endotracheal tube prior to extubation. Post-extubation, MI-E will be delivered via facemask or mouthpiece up to two times/day for 48 h. MI-E settings will be individualised. All patients will receive standard care (no MI-E) in relation to mechanical ventilation, weaning, rehabilitation, physiotherapy techniques such as positioning, manual airway clearance techniques, manual/ventilator hyperinflation, endotracheal suctioning, and nebulisation. Clinical data collection will occur before, on completion, and 5-min post-physiotherapy sessions (intervention/control arms). Resource use will be calculated for each 24-h period. Analyses will be descriptive and address feasibility outcomes including participant recruitment and attrition, proportion of MI-E treatment sessions completed, dataset completeness, and frequency of adverse events and acceptability. Semi-structured online interviews informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) with patients, clinicians, and family members will explore the acceptability of the MI-E intervention and study processes. Interview data will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis based on TFA domains through first-level coding. The embedded physiology study will use electrical impedance tomography and lung ultrasound to explore lung recruitment and de-recruitment during MI-E in a subset of 5–10 patients. DISCUSSION: This study will examine feasibility and acceptability of a RCT protocol of MI-E to promote extubation success. Study findings will inform design modification and conduct of a future adequately powered trial. Furthermore, the study will contribute and advance the understanding of MI-E use in critically ill intubated adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 24603037; IRAS 303674 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01362-7. BioMed Central 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10364411/ /pubmed/37488566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01362-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Swingwood, Ema
Voss, Sarah
Tume, Lyvonne N.
Bewley, Jeremy
Turner, Nicholas
Ntoumenopoulos, George
Rose, Louise
Cramp, Fiona
Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote extubation success in critically ill adults on intensive care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial
title Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote extubation success in critically ill adults on intensive care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial
title_full Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote extubation success in critically ill adults on intensive care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial
title_fullStr Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote extubation success in critically ill adults on intensive care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote extubation success in critically ill adults on intensive care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial
title_short Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote extubation success in critically ill adults on intensive care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial
title_sort mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote extubation success in critically ill adults on intensive care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01362-7
work_keys_str_mv AT swingwoodema mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationtopromoteextubationsuccessincriticallyilladultsonintensivecareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT vosssarah mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationtopromoteextubationsuccessincriticallyilladultsonintensivecareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT tumelyvonnen mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationtopromoteextubationsuccessincriticallyilladultsonintensivecareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT bewleyjeremy mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationtopromoteextubationsuccessincriticallyilladultsonintensivecareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT turnernicholas mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationtopromoteextubationsuccessincriticallyilladultsonintensivecareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT ntoumenopoulosgeorge mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationtopromoteextubationsuccessincriticallyilladultsonintensivecareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT roselouise mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationtopromoteextubationsuccessincriticallyilladultsonintensivecareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT crampfiona mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationtopromoteextubationsuccessincriticallyilladultsonintensivecareprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial