Cargando…

Evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke

BACKGROUND: Digital advancement of power assisted exercise equipment will advance exercise prescription for people with stroke (PwS). This article reports on the remote usability evaluation of a co-designed graphical user interface (GUI) and denotes an example of how video-conference software can in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Rachel, Sage, Karen, Broom, David, Hext, Andrew, Snowdon, Nicky, Smith, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01207-7
_version_ 1785076842384850944
author Young, Rachel
Sage, Karen
Broom, David
Hext, Andrew
Snowdon, Nicky
Smith, Christine
author_facet Young, Rachel
Sage, Karen
Broom, David
Hext, Andrew
Snowdon, Nicky
Smith, Christine
author_sort Young, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital advancement of power assisted exercise equipment will advance exercise prescription for people with stroke (PwS). This article reports on the remote usability evaluation of a co-designed graphical user interface (GUI) and denotes an example of how video-conference software can increase reach to participants in the testing of rehabilitation technologies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usability of two sequential versions of the GUI. METHODS: We adopted a mixed methods approach. Ten professional user (PU) (2M/8F) and 10 expert user (EU) participants (2M/8F) were recruited. Data collection included a usability observation, a ‘think aloud’ walk through, task completion, task duration and user satisfaction as indicated by the Post Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). Identification of usability issues informed the design of version 2 which included an additional submenu. Descriptive analysis was conducted upon usability issues and number of occurrences detected on both versions of the GUI. Inferential analysis enabled comparison of task duration and PSSUQ data between the PU and EU groups. RESULTS: Analysis of the ‘think aloud’ walkthrough data enabled identification of 22 usability issues on version 1 from a total of 100 usability occurrences. Task completion for all tasks was 100%. Eight usability issues were directly addressed in the development of version 2. Two recurrent and 24 new usability issues were detected in version 2 with a total of 86 usability occurrences. Paired two tailed T-tests on task duration data indicated a significant decrease amongst the EU group for task 1.1 on version 2 (P = 0.03). The mean PSSUQ scores for version 1 was 1.44 (EU group) and 1.63 (PU group) compared with 1.40 (EU group) and 1.41 (PU group) for version 2. CONCLUSIONS: The usability evaluation enabled identification of usability issues on version 1 of the GUI which were effectively addressed on the iteration of version 2. Testing of version 2 identified usability issues within the new submenu. Application of multiple usability evaluation methods was effective in identifying and addressing usability issues in the GUI to improve the experience of PAE for PwS. The use of video-conference software to conduct synchronous, remote usability testing is an effective alternative to face to face testing methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01207-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10364422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103644222023-07-25 Evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke Young, Rachel Sage, Karen Broom, David Hext, Andrew Snowdon, Nicky Smith, Christine J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Digital advancement of power assisted exercise equipment will advance exercise prescription for people with stroke (PwS). This article reports on the remote usability evaluation of a co-designed graphical user interface (GUI) and denotes an example of how video-conference software can increase reach to participants in the testing of rehabilitation technologies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usability of two sequential versions of the GUI. METHODS: We adopted a mixed methods approach. Ten professional user (PU) (2M/8F) and 10 expert user (EU) participants (2M/8F) were recruited. Data collection included a usability observation, a ‘think aloud’ walk through, task completion, task duration and user satisfaction as indicated by the Post Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). Identification of usability issues informed the design of version 2 which included an additional submenu. Descriptive analysis was conducted upon usability issues and number of occurrences detected on both versions of the GUI. Inferential analysis enabled comparison of task duration and PSSUQ data between the PU and EU groups. RESULTS: Analysis of the ‘think aloud’ walkthrough data enabled identification of 22 usability issues on version 1 from a total of 100 usability occurrences. Task completion for all tasks was 100%. Eight usability issues were directly addressed in the development of version 2. Two recurrent and 24 new usability issues were detected in version 2 with a total of 86 usability occurrences. Paired two tailed T-tests on task duration data indicated a significant decrease amongst the EU group for task 1.1 on version 2 (P = 0.03). The mean PSSUQ scores for version 1 was 1.44 (EU group) and 1.63 (PU group) compared with 1.40 (EU group) and 1.41 (PU group) for version 2. CONCLUSIONS: The usability evaluation enabled identification of usability issues on version 1 of the GUI which were effectively addressed on the iteration of version 2. Testing of version 2 identified usability issues within the new submenu. Application of multiple usability evaluation methods was effective in identifying and addressing usability issues in the GUI to improve the experience of PAE for PwS. The use of video-conference software to conduct synchronous, remote usability testing is an effective alternative to face to face testing methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01207-7. BioMed Central 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10364422/ /pubmed/37488564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01207-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Young, Rachel
Sage, Karen
Broom, David
Hext, Andrew
Snowdon, Nicky
Smith, Christine
Evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke
title Evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke
title_full Evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke
title_fullStr Evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke
title_short Evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke
title_sort evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01207-7
work_keys_str_mv AT youngrachel evaluatingtheusabilityofacodesignedpowerassistedexercisegraphicaluserinterfaceforpeoplewithstroke
AT sagekaren evaluatingtheusabilityofacodesignedpowerassistedexercisegraphicaluserinterfaceforpeoplewithstroke
AT broomdavid evaluatingtheusabilityofacodesignedpowerassistedexercisegraphicaluserinterfaceforpeoplewithstroke
AT hextandrew evaluatingtheusabilityofacodesignedpowerassistedexercisegraphicaluserinterfaceforpeoplewithstroke
AT snowdonnicky evaluatingtheusabilityofacodesignedpowerassistedexercisegraphicaluserinterfaceforpeoplewithstroke
AT smithchristine evaluatingtheusabilityofacodesignedpowerassistedexercisegraphicaluserinterfaceforpeoplewithstroke