Cargando…

Development and external validation of DISPAIR fistula risk score for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk after distal pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND: Highly utilized risk scores for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) have guided clinical decision-making in pancreatoduodenectomy. However, none has been successfully developed for distal pancreatectomy. This study aimed to develop and validate a new fistula ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonsdorff, Akseli, Ghorbani, Poya, Helanterä, Ilkka, Tarvainen, Timo, Kontio, Tea, Belfrage, Hanna, Sirén, Jukka, Kokkola, Arto, Sparrelid, Ernesto, Sallinen, Ville
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac266
_version_ 1785076898834939904
author Bonsdorff, Akseli
Ghorbani, Poya
Helanterä, Ilkka
Tarvainen, Timo
Kontio, Tea
Belfrage, Hanna
Sirén, Jukka
Kokkola, Arto
Sparrelid, Ernesto
Sallinen, Ville
author_facet Bonsdorff, Akseli
Ghorbani, Poya
Helanterä, Ilkka
Tarvainen, Timo
Kontio, Tea
Belfrage, Hanna
Sirén, Jukka
Kokkola, Arto
Sparrelid, Ernesto
Sallinen, Ville
author_sort Bonsdorff, Akseli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Highly utilized risk scores for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) have guided clinical decision-making in pancreatoduodenectomy. However, none has been successfully developed for distal pancreatectomy. This study aimed to develop and validate a new fistula risk score for distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland from 2013 to 2021, and at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden, from 2010 to 2020, were included retrospectively. The outcome was CR-POPF, according to the 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition. Preoperative clinical demographics and radiological parameters such as pancreatic thickness and duct diameter were measured. A logistic regression model was developed, internally validated with bootstrapping, and the performance assessed in an external validation cohort. RESULTS: Of 668 patients from Helsinki (266) and Stockholm (402), 173 (25.9 per cent) developed CR-POPF. The final model consisted of three variables assessed before surgery: transection site (neck versus body/tail), pancreatic thickness at transection site, and diabetes. The model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.904 (95 per cent c.i. 0.855 to 0.949) after internal validation, and 0.798 (0.748 to 0.848) after external validation. The calibration slope and intercept on external validation were 0.719 and 0.192 respectively. Four risk groups were defined in the validation cohort for clinical applicability: low (below 5 per cent), moderate (at least 5 but below 30 per cent), high (at least 30 but below 75 per cent), and extreme (75 per cent or more). The incidences in these groups were 8.7 per cent (11 of 126), 22.0 per cent (36 of 164), 63 per cent (57 of 91), and 81 per cent (17 of 21) respectively. CONCLUSION: The DISPAIR score after distal pancreatectomy may guide decision-making and allow a risk-adjusted outcome comparison for CR-POPF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10364701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103647012023-07-31 Development and external validation of DISPAIR fistula risk score for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk after distal pancreatectomy Bonsdorff, Akseli Ghorbani, Poya Helanterä, Ilkka Tarvainen, Timo Kontio, Tea Belfrage, Hanna Sirén, Jukka Kokkola, Arto Sparrelid, Ernesto Sallinen, Ville Br J Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Highly utilized risk scores for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) have guided clinical decision-making in pancreatoduodenectomy. However, none has been successfully developed for distal pancreatectomy. This study aimed to develop and validate a new fistula risk score for distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland from 2013 to 2021, and at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden, from 2010 to 2020, were included retrospectively. The outcome was CR-POPF, according to the 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition. Preoperative clinical demographics and radiological parameters such as pancreatic thickness and duct diameter were measured. A logistic regression model was developed, internally validated with bootstrapping, and the performance assessed in an external validation cohort. RESULTS: Of 668 patients from Helsinki (266) and Stockholm (402), 173 (25.9 per cent) developed CR-POPF. The final model consisted of three variables assessed before surgery: transection site (neck versus body/tail), pancreatic thickness at transection site, and diabetes. The model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.904 (95 per cent c.i. 0.855 to 0.949) after internal validation, and 0.798 (0.748 to 0.848) after external validation. The calibration slope and intercept on external validation were 0.719 and 0.192 respectively. Four risk groups were defined in the validation cohort for clinical applicability: low (below 5 per cent), moderate (at least 5 but below 30 per cent), high (at least 30 but below 75 per cent), and extreme (75 per cent or more). The incidences in these groups were 8.7 per cent (11 of 126), 22.0 per cent (36 of 164), 63 per cent (57 of 91), and 81 per cent (17 of 21) respectively. CONCLUSION: The DISPAIR score after distal pancreatectomy may guide decision-making and allow a risk-adjusted outcome comparison for CR-POPF. Oxford University Press 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10364701/ /pubmed/35983583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac266 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bonsdorff, Akseli
Ghorbani, Poya
Helanterä, Ilkka
Tarvainen, Timo
Kontio, Tea
Belfrage, Hanna
Sirén, Jukka
Kokkola, Arto
Sparrelid, Ernesto
Sallinen, Ville
Development and external validation of DISPAIR fistula risk score for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk after distal pancreatectomy
title Development and external validation of DISPAIR fistula risk score for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk after distal pancreatectomy
title_full Development and external validation of DISPAIR fistula risk score for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk after distal pancreatectomy
title_fullStr Development and external validation of DISPAIR fistula risk score for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk after distal pancreatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Development and external validation of DISPAIR fistula risk score for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk after distal pancreatectomy
title_short Development and external validation of DISPAIR fistula risk score for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk after distal pancreatectomy
title_sort development and external validation of dispair fistula risk score for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk after distal pancreatectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac266
work_keys_str_mv AT bonsdorffakseli developmentandexternalvalidationofdispairfistulariskscoreforclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistulariskafterdistalpancreatectomy
AT ghorbanipoya developmentandexternalvalidationofdispairfistulariskscoreforclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistulariskafterdistalpancreatectomy
AT helanterailkka developmentandexternalvalidationofdispairfistulariskscoreforclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistulariskafterdistalpancreatectomy
AT tarvainentimo developmentandexternalvalidationofdispairfistulariskscoreforclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistulariskafterdistalpancreatectomy
AT kontiotea developmentandexternalvalidationofdispairfistulariskscoreforclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistulariskafterdistalpancreatectomy
AT belfragehanna developmentandexternalvalidationofdispairfistulariskscoreforclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistulariskafterdistalpancreatectomy
AT sirenjukka developmentandexternalvalidationofdispairfistulariskscoreforclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistulariskafterdistalpancreatectomy
AT kokkolaarto developmentandexternalvalidationofdispairfistulariskscoreforclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistulariskafterdistalpancreatectomy
AT sparrelidernesto developmentandexternalvalidationofdispairfistulariskscoreforclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistulariskafterdistalpancreatectomy
AT sallinenville developmentandexternalvalidationofdispairfistulariskscoreforclinicallyrelevantpostoperativepancreaticfistulariskafterdistalpancreatectomy