Cargando…

National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors

BACKGROUND: Despite high waiting list mortality rates, concern still exists on the appropriateness of using livers donated after circulatory death (DCD). We compared mortality and graft loss in recipients of livers donated after circulatory or brainstem death (DBD) across two successive time periods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallace, David, Cowling, Thomas E, Suddle, Abid, Gimson, Alex, Rowe, Ian, Callaghan, Chris, Sapisochin, Gonzalo, Ivanics, Tommy, Claasen, Marco, Mehta, Neil, Heaton, Nigel, van der Meulen, Jan, Walker, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab347
_version_ 1785076899093938176
author Wallace, David
Cowling, Thomas E
Suddle, Abid
Gimson, Alex
Rowe, Ian
Callaghan, Chris
Sapisochin, Gonzalo
Ivanics, Tommy
Claasen, Marco
Mehta, Neil
Heaton, Nigel
van der Meulen, Jan
Walker, Kate
author_facet Wallace, David
Cowling, Thomas E
Suddle, Abid
Gimson, Alex
Rowe, Ian
Callaghan, Chris
Sapisochin, Gonzalo
Ivanics, Tommy
Claasen, Marco
Mehta, Neil
Heaton, Nigel
van der Meulen, Jan
Walker, Kate
author_sort Wallace, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite high waiting list mortality rates, concern still exists on the appropriateness of using livers donated after circulatory death (DCD). We compared mortality and graft loss in recipients of livers donated after circulatory or brainstem death (DBD) across two successive time periods. METHODS: Observational multinational data from the United Kingdom and Ireland were partitioned into two time periods (2008–2011 and 2012–2016). Cox regression methods were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing the impact of periods on post-transplant mortality and graft failure. RESULTS: A total of 1176 DCD recipients and 3749 DBD recipients were included. Three-year patient mortality rates decreased markedly from 19.6 per cent in time period 1 to 10.4 per cent in time period 2 (adjusted HR 0.43, 95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.62; P < 0.001) for DCD recipients but only decreased from 12.8 to 11.3 per cent (adjusted HR 0.96, 95 per cent c.i. 0.78 to 1.19; P = 0.732) in DBD recipients (P for interaction = 0.001). No time period-specific improvements in 3-year graft failure were observed for DCD (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% c.i. 0.61 to 1.05; P = 0.116) or DBD recipients (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% c.i. 0.79 to 1.14; P = 0.607). A slight increase in retransplantation rates occurred between time period 1 and 2 in those who received a DCD liver (from 7.3 to 11.8 per cent; P = 0.042), but there was no change in those receiving a DBD liver (from 4.9 to 4.5 per cent; P = 0.365). In time period 2, no difference in mortality rates between those receiving a DCD liver and those receiving a DBD liver was observed (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% c.i. 0.56 to 1.09; P = 0.142). CONCLUSION: Mortality rates more than halved in recipients of a DCD liver over a decade and eventually compared similarly to mortality rates in recipients of a DBD liver. Regions with high waiting list mortality may mitigate this by use of DCD livers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10364702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103647022023-07-31 National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors Wallace, David Cowling, Thomas E Suddle, Abid Gimson, Alex Rowe, Ian Callaghan, Chris Sapisochin, Gonzalo Ivanics, Tommy Claasen, Marco Mehta, Neil Heaton, Nigel van der Meulen, Jan Walker, Kate Br J Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND: Despite high waiting list mortality rates, concern still exists on the appropriateness of using livers donated after circulatory death (DCD). We compared mortality and graft loss in recipients of livers donated after circulatory or brainstem death (DBD) across two successive time periods. METHODS: Observational multinational data from the United Kingdom and Ireland were partitioned into two time periods (2008–2011 and 2012–2016). Cox regression methods were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing the impact of periods on post-transplant mortality and graft failure. RESULTS: A total of 1176 DCD recipients and 3749 DBD recipients were included. Three-year patient mortality rates decreased markedly from 19.6 per cent in time period 1 to 10.4 per cent in time period 2 (adjusted HR 0.43, 95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.62; P < 0.001) for DCD recipients but only decreased from 12.8 to 11.3 per cent (adjusted HR 0.96, 95 per cent c.i. 0.78 to 1.19; P = 0.732) in DBD recipients (P for interaction = 0.001). No time period-specific improvements in 3-year graft failure were observed for DCD (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% c.i. 0.61 to 1.05; P = 0.116) or DBD recipients (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% c.i. 0.79 to 1.14; P = 0.607). A slight increase in retransplantation rates occurred between time period 1 and 2 in those who received a DCD liver (from 7.3 to 11.8 per cent; P = 0.042), but there was no change in those receiving a DBD liver (from 4.9 to 4.5 per cent; P = 0.365). In time period 2, no difference in mortality rates between those receiving a DCD liver and those receiving a DBD liver was observed (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% c.i. 0.56 to 1.09; P = 0.142). CONCLUSION: Mortality rates more than halved in recipients of a DCD liver over a decade and eventually compared similarly to mortality rates in recipients of a DBD liver. Regions with high waiting list mortality may mitigate this by use of DCD livers. Oxford University Press 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10364702/ /pubmed/34738095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab347 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wallace, David
Cowling, Thomas E
Suddle, Abid
Gimson, Alex
Rowe, Ian
Callaghan, Chris
Sapisochin, Gonzalo
Ivanics, Tommy
Claasen, Marco
Mehta, Neil
Heaton, Nigel
van der Meulen, Jan
Walker, Kate
National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors
title National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors
title_full National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors
title_fullStr National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors
title_full_unstemmed National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors
title_short National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors
title_sort national time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab347
work_keys_str_mv AT wallacedavid nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT cowlingthomase nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT suddleabid nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT gimsonalex nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT roweian nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT callaghanchris nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT sapisochingonzalo nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT ivanicstommy nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT claasenmarco nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT mehtaneil nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT heatonnigel nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT vandermeulenjan nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors
AT walkerkate nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors