Cargando…
National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors
BACKGROUND: Despite high waiting list mortality rates, concern still exists on the appropriateness of using livers donated after circulatory death (DCD). We compared mortality and graft loss in recipients of livers donated after circulatory or brainstem death (DBD) across two successive time periods...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab347 |
_version_ | 1785076899093938176 |
---|---|
author | Wallace, David Cowling, Thomas E Suddle, Abid Gimson, Alex Rowe, Ian Callaghan, Chris Sapisochin, Gonzalo Ivanics, Tommy Claasen, Marco Mehta, Neil Heaton, Nigel van der Meulen, Jan Walker, Kate |
author_facet | Wallace, David Cowling, Thomas E Suddle, Abid Gimson, Alex Rowe, Ian Callaghan, Chris Sapisochin, Gonzalo Ivanics, Tommy Claasen, Marco Mehta, Neil Heaton, Nigel van der Meulen, Jan Walker, Kate |
author_sort | Wallace, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite high waiting list mortality rates, concern still exists on the appropriateness of using livers donated after circulatory death (DCD). We compared mortality and graft loss in recipients of livers donated after circulatory or brainstem death (DBD) across two successive time periods. METHODS: Observational multinational data from the United Kingdom and Ireland were partitioned into two time periods (2008–2011 and 2012–2016). Cox regression methods were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing the impact of periods on post-transplant mortality and graft failure. RESULTS: A total of 1176 DCD recipients and 3749 DBD recipients were included. Three-year patient mortality rates decreased markedly from 19.6 per cent in time period 1 to 10.4 per cent in time period 2 (adjusted HR 0.43, 95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.62; P < 0.001) for DCD recipients but only decreased from 12.8 to 11.3 per cent (adjusted HR 0.96, 95 per cent c.i. 0.78 to 1.19; P = 0.732) in DBD recipients (P for interaction = 0.001). No time period-specific improvements in 3-year graft failure were observed for DCD (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% c.i. 0.61 to 1.05; P = 0.116) or DBD recipients (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% c.i. 0.79 to 1.14; P = 0.607). A slight increase in retransplantation rates occurred between time period 1 and 2 in those who received a DCD liver (from 7.3 to 11.8 per cent; P = 0.042), but there was no change in those receiving a DBD liver (from 4.9 to 4.5 per cent; P = 0.365). In time period 2, no difference in mortality rates between those receiving a DCD liver and those receiving a DBD liver was observed (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% c.i. 0.56 to 1.09; P = 0.142). CONCLUSION: Mortality rates more than halved in recipients of a DCD liver over a decade and eventually compared similarly to mortality rates in recipients of a DBD liver. Regions with high waiting list mortality may mitigate this by use of DCD livers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10364702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103647022023-07-31 National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors Wallace, David Cowling, Thomas E Suddle, Abid Gimson, Alex Rowe, Ian Callaghan, Chris Sapisochin, Gonzalo Ivanics, Tommy Claasen, Marco Mehta, Neil Heaton, Nigel van der Meulen, Jan Walker, Kate Br J Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND: Despite high waiting list mortality rates, concern still exists on the appropriateness of using livers donated after circulatory death (DCD). We compared mortality and graft loss in recipients of livers donated after circulatory or brainstem death (DBD) across two successive time periods. METHODS: Observational multinational data from the United Kingdom and Ireland were partitioned into two time periods (2008–2011 and 2012–2016). Cox regression methods were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing the impact of periods on post-transplant mortality and graft failure. RESULTS: A total of 1176 DCD recipients and 3749 DBD recipients were included. Three-year patient mortality rates decreased markedly from 19.6 per cent in time period 1 to 10.4 per cent in time period 2 (adjusted HR 0.43, 95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.62; P < 0.001) for DCD recipients but only decreased from 12.8 to 11.3 per cent (adjusted HR 0.96, 95 per cent c.i. 0.78 to 1.19; P = 0.732) in DBD recipients (P for interaction = 0.001). No time period-specific improvements in 3-year graft failure were observed for DCD (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% c.i. 0.61 to 1.05; P = 0.116) or DBD recipients (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% c.i. 0.79 to 1.14; P = 0.607). A slight increase in retransplantation rates occurred between time period 1 and 2 in those who received a DCD liver (from 7.3 to 11.8 per cent; P = 0.042), but there was no change in those receiving a DBD liver (from 4.9 to 4.5 per cent; P = 0.365). In time period 2, no difference in mortality rates between those receiving a DCD liver and those receiving a DBD liver was observed (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% c.i. 0.56 to 1.09; P = 0.142). CONCLUSION: Mortality rates more than halved in recipients of a DCD liver over a decade and eventually compared similarly to mortality rates in recipients of a DBD liver. Regions with high waiting list mortality may mitigate this by use of DCD livers. Oxford University Press 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10364702/ /pubmed/34738095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab347 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wallace, David Cowling, Thomas E Suddle, Abid Gimson, Alex Rowe, Ian Callaghan, Chris Sapisochin, Gonzalo Ivanics, Tommy Claasen, Marco Mehta, Neil Heaton, Nigel van der Meulen, Jan Walker, Kate National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors |
title | National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors |
title_full | National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors |
title_fullStr | National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors |
title_full_unstemmed | National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors |
title_short | National time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors |
title_sort | national time trends in mortality and graft survival following liver transplantation from circulatory death or brainstem death donors |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallacedavid nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT cowlingthomase nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT suddleabid nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT gimsonalex nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT roweian nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT callaghanchris nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT sapisochingonzalo nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT ivanicstommy nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT claasenmarco nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT mehtaneil nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT heatonnigel nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT vandermeulenjan nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors AT walkerkate nationaltimetrendsinmortalityandgraftsurvivalfollowinglivertransplantationfromcirculatorydeathorbrainstemdeathdonors |