Cargando…
Author response to: Comment on: Performance of non-invasive biomarkers compared with invasive methods for risk prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35979560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac260 |
| _version_ | 1785076903301873664 |
|---|---|
| author | Hobeika, Christian Cauchy, François |
| author_facet | Hobeika, Christian Cauchy, François |
| author_sort | Hobeika, Christian |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-10364719 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-103647192023-07-31 Author response to: Comment on: Performance of non-invasive biomarkers compared with invasive methods for risk prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma Hobeika, Christian Cauchy, François Br J Surg Correspondence Oxford University Press 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10364719/ /pubmed/35979560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac260 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
| spellingShingle | Correspondence Hobeika, Christian Cauchy, François Author response to: Comment on: Performance of non-invasive biomarkers compared with invasive methods for risk prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma |
| title | Author response to: Comment on: Performance of non-invasive biomarkers compared with invasive methods for risk prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma |
| title_full | Author response to: Comment on: Performance of non-invasive biomarkers compared with invasive methods for risk prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma |
| title_fullStr | Author response to: Comment on: Performance of non-invasive biomarkers compared with invasive methods for risk prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma |
| title_full_unstemmed | Author response to: Comment on: Performance of non-invasive biomarkers compared with invasive methods for risk prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma |
| title_short | Author response to: Comment on: Performance of non-invasive biomarkers compared with invasive methods for risk prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma |
| title_sort | author response to: comment on: performance of non-invasive biomarkers compared with invasive methods for risk prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma |
| topic | Correspondence |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35979560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac260 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hobeikachristian authorresponsetocommentonperformanceofnoninvasivebiomarkerscomparedwithinvasivemethodsforriskpredictionofposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinoma AT cauchyfrancois authorresponsetocommentonperformanceofnoninvasivebiomarkerscomparedwithinvasivemethodsforriskpredictionofposthepatectomyliverfailureinhepatocellularcarcinoma |