Cargando…

Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study

BACKGROUND: There is ongoing debate concerning the necessity of routine histopathological examination following cholecystectomy. In order to reduce the pathology workload and save costs, a selective approach has been suggested, but evidence regarding its oncological safety is lacking. METHODS: In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bastiaenen, Vivian P., van Vliet, Jaap L. P., de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J., Corten, Bartholomeus J. G. A., de Jonge, Joske, Kraima, Anne C., Swank, Hilko A., van Acker, Gijs J. D., van Geloven, Anna A. W., in ‘t Hof, Klaas H., Koens, Lianne, de Reuver, Philip R., van Rossem, Charles C., Slooter, Gerrit D., Tanis, Pieter J., Terpstra, Valeska, Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W., Bemelman, Willem A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35245363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab469
_version_ 1785076915780976640
author Bastiaenen, Vivian P.
van Vliet, Jaap L. P.
de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J.
Corten, Bartholomeus J. G. A.
de Jonge, Joske
Kraima, Anne C.
Swank, Hilko A.
van Acker, Gijs J. D.
van Geloven, Anna A. W.
in ‘t Hof, Klaas H.
Koens, Lianne
de Reuver, Philip R.
van Rossem, Charles C.
Slooter, Gerrit D.
Tanis, Pieter J.
Terpstra, Valeska
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W.
Bemelman, Willem A.
author_facet Bastiaenen, Vivian P.
van Vliet, Jaap L. P.
de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J.
Corten, Bartholomeus J. G. A.
de Jonge, Joske
Kraima, Anne C.
Swank, Hilko A.
van Acker, Gijs J. D.
van Geloven, Anna A. W.
in ‘t Hof, Klaas H.
Koens, Lianne
de Reuver, Philip R.
van Rossem, Charles C.
Slooter, Gerrit D.
Tanis, Pieter J.
Terpstra, Valeska
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W.
Bemelman, Willem A.
author_sort Bastiaenen, Vivian P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is ongoing debate concerning the necessity of routine histopathological examination following cholecystectomy. In order to reduce the pathology workload and save costs, a selective approach has been suggested, but evidence regarding its oncological safety is lacking. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional study, all gallbladders removed for gallstone disease or cholecystitis were systematically examined by the surgeon for macroscopic abnormalities indicative of malignancy. Before sending all specimens to the pathologist, the surgeon judged whether histopathological examination was indicated. The main outcomes were the number of patients with hypothetically missed malignancy with clinical consequences (upper limit two-sided 95 per cent c.i. below 3:1000 considered oncologically safe) and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination. RESULTS: Twenty-two (2.19:1000) of 10 041 specimens exhibited malignancy with clinical consequences. In case of a selective policy, surgeons would have held back 7846 of 10041 (78.1 per cent) gallbladders from histopathological examination. Malignancy with clinical consequences would have been missed in seven of 7846 patients (0.89:1000, upper limit 95% c.i. 1.40:1000). No patient benefitted from the clinical consequences, while two were harmed (futile additional surgery). Of 15 patients in whom malignancy with clinical consequences would have been diagnosed, one benefitted (residual disease radically removed), two potentially benefitted (palliative systemic therapy), and four experienced harm (futile additional surgery). Estimated cost savings established by replacing routine for selective histopathological examination were €703 500 per 10 000 patients. CONCLUSION: Selective histopathological examination following cholecystectomy is oncologically safe and could reduce pathology workload, costs, and futile re-resections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10364776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103647762023-07-31 Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study Bastiaenen, Vivian P. van Vliet, Jaap L. P. de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. Corten, Bartholomeus J. G. A. de Jonge, Joske Kraima, Anne C. Swank, Hilko A. van Acker, Gijs J. D. van Geloven, Anna A. W. in ‘t Hof, Klaas H. Koens, Lianne de Reuver, Philip R. van Rossem, Charles C. Slooter, Gerrit D. Tanis, Pieter J. Terpstra, Valeska Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W. Bemelman, Willem A. Br J Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: There is ongoing debate concerning the necessity of routine histopathological examination following cholecystectomy. In order to reduce the pathology workload and save costs, a selective approach has been suggested, but evidence regarding its oncological safety is lacking. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional study, all gallbladders removed for gallstone disease or cholecystitis were systematically examined by the surgeon for macroscopic abnormalities indicative of malignancy. Before sending all specimens to the pathologist, the surgeon judged whether histopathological examination was indicated. The main outcomes were the number of patients with hypothetically missed malignancy with clinical consequences (upper limit two-sided 95 per cent c.i. below 3:1000 considered oncologically safe) and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination. RESULTS: Twenty-two (2.19:1000) of 10 041 specimens exhibited malignancy with clinical consequences. In case of a selective policy, surgeons would have held back 7846 of 10041 (78.1 per cent) gallbladders from histopathological examination. Malignancy with clinical consequences would have been missed in seven of 7846 patients (0.89:1000, upper limit 95% c.i. 1.40:1000). No patient benefitted from the clinical consequences, while two were harmed (futile additional surgery). Of 15 patients in whom malignancy with clinical consequences would have been diagnosed, one benefitted (residual disease radically removed), two potentially benefitted (palliative systemic therapy), and four experienced harm (futile additional surgery). Estimated cost savings established by replacing routine for selective histopathological examination were €703 500 per 10 000 patients. CONCLUSION: Selective histopathological examination following cholecystectomy is oncologically safe and could reduce pathology workload, costs, and futile re-resections. Oxford University Press 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10364776/ /pubmed/35245363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab469 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Bastiaenen, Vivian P.
van Vliet, Jaap L. P.
de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J.
Corten, Bartholomeus J. G. A.
de Jonge, Joske
Kraima, Anne C.
Swank, Hilko A.
van Acker, Gijs J. D.
van Geloven, Anna A. W.
in ‘t Hof, Klaas H.
Koens, Lianne
de Reuver, Philip R.
van Rossem, Charles C.
Slooter, Gerrit D.
Tanis, Pieter J.
Terpstra, Valeska
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W.
Bemelman, Willem A.
Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study
title Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study
title_full Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study
title_fullStr Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study
title_short Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study
title_sort safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional fancy study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35245363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab469
work_keys_str_mv AT bastiaenenvivianp safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT vanvlietjaaplp safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT desavorninlohmaneliseaj safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT cortenbartholomeusjga safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT dejongejoske safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT kraimaannec safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT swankhilkoa safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT vanackergijsjd safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT vangelovenannaaw safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT inthofklaash safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT koenslianne safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT dereuverphilipr safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT vanrossemcharlesc safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT slootergerritd safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT tanispieterj safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT terpstravaleska safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT dijkgraafmarcelgw safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT bemelmanwillema safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy
AT safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy