Cargando…
Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study
BACKGROUND: There is ongoing debate concerning the necessity of routine histopathological examination following cholecystectomy. In order to reduce the pathology workload and save costs, a selective approach has been suggested, but evidence regarding its oncological safety is lacking. METHODS: In th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35245363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab469 |
_version_ | 1785076915780976640 |
---|---|
author | Bastiaenen, Vivian P. van Vliet, Jaap L. P. de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. Corten, Bartholomeus J. G. A. de Jonge, Joske Kraima, Anne C. Swank, Hilko A. van Acker, Gijs J. D. van Geloven, Anna A. W. in ‘t Hof, Klaas H. Koens, Lianne de Reuver, Philip R. van Rossem, Charles C. Slooter, Gerrit D. Tanis, Pieter J. Terpstra, Valeska Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W. Bemelman, Willem A. |
author_facet | Bastiaenen, Vivian P. van Vliet, Jaap L. P. de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. Corten, Bartholomeus J. G. A. de Jonge, Joske Kraima, Anne C. Swank, Hilko A. van Acker, Gijs J. D. van Geloven, Anna A. W. in ‘t Hof, Klaas H. Koens, Lianne de Reuver, Philip R. van Rossem, Charles C. Slooter, Gerrit D. Tanis, Pieter J. Terpstra, Valeska Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W. Bemelman, Willem A. |
author_sort | Bastiaenen, Vivian P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is ongoing debate concerning the necessity of routine histopathological examination following cholecystectomy. In order to reduce the pathology workload and save costs, a selective approach has been suggested, but evidence regarding its oncological safety is lacking. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional study, all gallbladders removed for gallstone disease or cholecystitis were systematically examined by the surgeon for macroscopic abnormalities indicative of malignancy. Before sending all specimens to the pathologist, the surgeon judged whether histopathological examination was indicated. The main outcomes were the number of patients with hypothetically missed malignancy with clinical consequences (upper limit two-sided 95 per cent c.i. below 3:1000 considered oncologically safe) and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination. RESULTS: Twenty-two (2.19:1000) of 10 041 specimens exhibited malignancy with clinical consequences. In case of a selective policy, surgeons would have held back 7846 of 10041 (78.1 per cent) gallbladders from histopathological examination. Malignancy with clinical consequences would have been missed in seven of 7846 patients (0.89:1000, upper limit 95% c.i. 1.40:1000). No patient benefitted from the clinical consequences, while two were harmed (futile additional surgery). Of 15 patients in whom malignancy with clinical consequences would have been diagnosed, one benefitted (residual disease radically removed), two potentially benefitted (palliative systemic therapy), and four experienced harm (futile additional surgery). Estimated cost savings established by replacing routine for selective histopathological examination were €703 500 per 10 000 patients. CONCLUSION: Selective histopathological examination following cholecystectomy is oncologically safe and could reduce pathology workload, costs, and futile re-resections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10364776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103647762023-07-31 Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study Bastiaenen, Vivian P. van Vliet, Jaap L. P. de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. Corten, Bartholomeus J. G. A. de Jonge, Joske Kraima, Anne C. Swank, Hilko A. van Acker, Gijs J. D. van Geloven, Anna A. W. in ‘t Hof, Klaas H. Koens, Lianne de Reuver, Philip R. van Rossem, Charles C. Slooter, Gerrit D. Tanis, Pieter J. Terpstra, Valeska Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W. Bemelman, Willem A. Br J Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: There is ongoing debate concerning the necessity of routine histopathological examination following cholecystectomy. In order to reduce the pathology workload and save costs, a selective approach has been suggested, but evidence regarding its oncological safety is lacking. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional study, all gallbladders removed for gallstone disease or cholecystitis were systematically examined by the surgeon for macroscopic abnormalities indicative of malignancy. Before sending all specimens to the pathologist, the surgeon judged whether histopathological examination was indicated. The main outcomes were the number of patients with hypothetically missed malignancy with clinical consequences (upper limit two-sided 95 per cent c.i. below 3:1000 considered oncologically safe) and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination. RESULTS: Twenty-two (2.19:1000) of 10 041 specimens exhibited malignancy with clinical consequences. In case of a selective policy, surgeons would have held back 7846 of 10041 (78.1 per cent) gallbladders from histopathological examination. Malignancy with clinical consequences would have been missed in seven of 7846 patients (0.89:1000, upper limit 95% c.i. 1.40:1000). No patient benefitted from the clinical consequences, while two were harmed (futile additional surgery). Of 15 patients in whom malignancy with clinical consequences would have been diagnosed, one benefitted (residual disease radically removed), two potentially benefitted (palliative systemic therapy), and four experienced harm (futile additional surgery). Estimated cost savings established by replacing routine for selective histopathological examination were €703 500 per 10 000 patients. CONCLUSION: Selective histopathological examination following cholecystectomy is oncologically safe and could reduce pathology workload, costs, and futile re-resections. Oxford University Press 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10364776/ /pubmed/35245363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab469 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bastiaenen, Vivian P. van Vliet, Jaap L. P. de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. Corten, Bartholomeus J. G. A. de Jonge, Joske Kraima, Anne C. Swank, Hilko A. van Acker, Gijs J. D. van Geloven, Anna A. W. in ‘t Hof, Klaas H. Koens, Lianne de Reuver, Philip R. van Rossem, Charles C. Slooter, Gerrit D. Tanis, Pieter J. Terpstra, Valeska Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W. Bemelman, Willem A. Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study |
title | Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study |
title_full | Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study |
title_fullStr | Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study |
title_short | Safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional FANCY study |
title_sort | safety and economic analysis of selective histopathology following cholecystectomy: multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional fancy study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35245363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab469 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bastiaenenvivianp safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT vanvlietjaaplp safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT desavorninlohmaneliseaj safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT cortenbartholomeusjga safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT dejongejoske safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT kraimaannec safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT swankhilkoa safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT vanackergijsjd safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT vangelovenannaaw safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT inthofklaash safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT koenslianne safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT dereuverphilipr safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT vanrossemcharlesc safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT slootergerritd safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT tanispieterj safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT terpstravaleska safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT dijkgraafmarcelgw safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT bemelmanwillema safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy AT safetyandeconomicanalysisofselectivehistopathologyfollowingcholecystectomymulticentreprospectivecrosssectionalfancystudy |