Cargando…
A review on the production of 17-4PH parts using press and sinter technology
The press and sinter method remains the standard among powder metallurgy processes for powdered stainless-steel materials. It delivers low cost, low oxidation rate, and adequate corrosion resistance. Furthermore, 17-4PH is a martensitic stainless-steel that is commonly used for high-strength and med...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36718527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504221146060 |
_version_ | 1785076919096573952 |
---|---|
author | Kareem, Mohammed Qasim Mikó, Tamás Gergely, Gréta Gácsi, Zoltán |
author_facet | Kareem, Mohammed Qasim Mikó, Tamás Gergely, Gréta Gácsi, Zoltán |
author_sort | Kareem, Mohammed Qasim |
collection | PubMed |
description | The press and sinter method remains the standard among powder metallurgy processes for powdered stainless-steel materials. It delivers low cost, low oxidation rate, and adequate corrosion resistance. Furthermore, 17-4PH is a martensitic stainless-steel that is commonly used for high-strength and medium-ductility stainless steel parts. However, a few studies have investigated the press and sinter method for producing 17-4PH parts. This shortage is due to the high hardness (low compressibility) of 17-4PH powder. Thus, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the press and sinter method in terms of the manufacturing process, the influencing factors, and the theoretical basis of press and sinter methods in conjunction with metal injection molding technology for the production of 17-4PH parts. First, the literature and monographs are examined and summarized to cover the previous results, research progress, development trends, and applications of press and sinter method 17-4PH parts. Following the theoretical analysis, the practical investigation was conducted by producing parts with cold pressing from 800 to 1600 MPa, followed by sintering: the sintering temperature was 1200 °C for one hour under a protective vacuum atmosphere. ImageJ analysis was performed to measure the sinter density. The results showed an increase in relative sinter density from 84.43% to 96.43% for 800 and 1600 MPa, respectively, while the earlier results reached 93.47%. Overall, the press and sinter method enables the production of high-hardness 17-4PH parts with a high density, without using additives like lubricants, wax, or alloying elements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10364798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103647982023-08-09 A review on the production of 17-4PH parts using press and sinter technology Kareem, Mohammed Qasim Mikó, Tamás Gergely, Gréta Gácsi, Zoltán Sci Prog Review The press and sinter method remains the standard among powder metallurgy processes for powdered stainless-steel materials. It delivers low cost, low oxidation rate, and adequate corrosion resistance. Furthermore, 17-4PH is a martensitic stainless-steel that is commonly used for high-strength and medium-ductility stainless steel parts. However, a few studies have investigated the press and sinter method for producing 17-4PH parts. This shortage is due to the high hardness (low compressibility) of 17-4PH powder. Thus, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the press and sinter method in terms of the manufacturing process, the influencing factors, and the theoretical basis of press and sinter methods in conjunction with metal injection molding technology for the production of 17-4PH parts. First, the literature and monographs are examined and summarized to cover the previous results, research progress, development trends, and applications of press and sinter method 17-4PH parts. Following the theoretical analysis, the practical investigation was conducted by producing parts with cold pressing from 800 to 1600 MPa, followed by sintering: the sintering temperature was 1200 °C for one hour under a protective vacuum atmosphere. ImageJ analysis was performed to measure the sinter density. The results showed an increase in relative sinter density from 84.43% to 96.43% for 800 and 1600 MPa, respectively, while the earlier results reached 93.47%. Overall, the press and sinter method enables the production of high-hardness 17-4PH parts with a high density, without using additives like lubricants, wax, or alloying elements. SAGE Publications 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10364798/ /pubmed/36718527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504221146060 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Kareem, Mohammed Qasim Mikó, Tamás Gergely, Gréta Gácsi, Zoltán A review on the production of 17-4PH parts using press and sinter technology |
title | A review on the production of 17-4PH parts using press and sinter technology |
title_full | A review on the production of 17-4PH parts using press and sinter technology |
title_fullStr | A review on the production of 17-4PH parts using press and sinter technology |
title_full_unstemmed | A review on the production of 17-4PH parts using press and sinter technology |
title_short | A review on the production of 17-4PH parts using press and sinter technology |
title_sort | review on the production of 17-4ph parts using press and sinter technology |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36718527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504221146060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kareemmohammedqasim areviewontheproductionof174phpartsusingpressandsintertechnology AT mikotamas areviewontheproductionof174phpartsusingpressandsintertechnology AT gergelygreta areviewontheproductionof174phpartsusingpressandsintertechnology AT gacsizoltan areviewontheproductionof174phpartsusingpressandsintertechnology AT kareemmohammedqasim reviewontheproductionof174phpartsusingpressandsintertechnology AT mikotamas reviewontheproductionof174phpartsusingpressandsintertechnology AT gergelygreta reviewontheproductionof174phpartsusingpressandsintertechnology AT gacsizoltan reviewontheproductionof174phpartsusingpressandsintertechnology |