Cargando…
Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
BACKGROUND: YouTube plays an influential role in disseminating health-related information in the digital age. This study aimed to evaluate YouTube videos on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in terms of their information value and quality. METHODS: In this descriptive study, we rank...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492399 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15412 |
_version_ | 1785076920776392704 |
---|---|
author | Erkin, Yüksel Hanci, Volkan Ozduran, Erkan |
author_facet | Erkin, Yüksel Hanci, Volkan Ozduran, Erkan |
author_sort | Erkin, Yüksel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: YouTube plays an influential role in disseminating health-related information in the digital age. This study aimed to evaluate YouTube videos on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in terms of their information value and quality. METHODS: In this descriptive study, we ranked the first 100 videos that met the inclusion criteria using the search term “transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation” on October 30, 2022. These videos were classified according to the number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, duration, popularity and content categories. Reliability, quality, and accuracy of the videos were assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria and Modified DISCERN Questionnaire and Global Quality Score (GQS). Video popularity were calculated by the Video Power Index (VPI). RESULTS: Based on the GQS results, we found that 59, 27, and 14 videos had low, intermediate, and high quality, respectively. In addition, based on the JAMA results, 79 and 21 videos had poor and high reliability, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the JAMA, modified DISCERN and GQS scores in terms of the sources of videos (p = 0.226, p = 0.115, p = 0.812). Notably, there was a weak positive correlation between the JAMA scores and the number of views (r = 0.204, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: According to our study results, most YouTube videos on TENS were of low quality and reliability. Additionally, most videos were uploaded from sources created by doctors; the most frequently found content was about the TENS procedure, and content on complications of the procedure became less frequent as the videos became more recent. In particular, it was found that videos uploaded by academics have longer duration. It has been found that reliable videos with high JAMA scores also have high number of views. Accordingly, it can be concluded that videos with higher quality and more reliability that are created by healthcare providers will be more useful for patients seeking information about TENS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10364807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103648072023-07-25 Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation Erkin, Yüksel Hanci, Volkan Ozduran, Erkan PeerJ Anesthesiology and Pain Management BACKGROUND: YouTube plays an influential role in disseminating health-related information in the digital age. This study aimed to evaluate YouTube videos on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in terms of their information value and quality. METHODS: In this descriptive study, we ranked the first 100 videos that met the inclusion criteria using the search term “transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation” on October 30, 2022. These videos were classified according to the number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, duration, popularity and content categories. Reliability, quality, and accuracy of the videos were assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria and Modified DISCERN Questionnaire and Global Quality Score (GQS). Video popularity were calculated by the Video Power Index (VPI). RESULTS: Based on the GQS results, we found that 59, 27, and 14 videos had low, intermediate, and high quality, respectively. In addition, based on the JAMA results, 79 and 21 videos had poor and high reliability, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the JAMA, modified DISCERN and GQS scores in terms of the sources of videos (p = 0.226, p = 0.115, p = 0.812). Notably, there was a weak positive correlation between the JAMA scores and the number of views (r = 0.204, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: According to our study results, most YouTube videos on TENS were of low quality and reliability. Additionally, most videos were uploaded from sources created by doctors; the most frequently found content was about the TENS procedure, and content on complications of the procedure became less frequent as the videos became more recent. In particular, it was found that videos uploaded by academics have longer duration. It has been found that reliable videos with high JAMA scores also have high number of views. Accordingly, it can be concluded that videos with higher quality and more reliability that are created by healthcare providers will be more useful for patients seeking information about TENS. PeerJ Inc. 2023-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10364807/ /pubmed/37492399 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15412 Text en ©2023 Erkin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author (s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Anesthesiology and Pain Management Erkin, Yüksel Hanci, Volkan Ozduran, Erkan Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title | Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title_full | Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title_short | Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title_sort | evaluation of the reliability and quality of youtube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
topic | Anesthesiology and Pain Management |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492399 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erkinyuksel evaluationofthereliabilityandqualityofyoutubevideosasasourceofinformationfortranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation AT hancivolkan evaluationofthereliabilityandqualityofyoutubevideosasasourceofinformationfortranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation AT ozduranerkan evaluationofthereliabilityandqualityofyoutubevideosasasourceofinformationfortranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation |