Cargando…

Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

BACKGROUND: YouTube plays an influential role in disseminating health-related information in the digital age. This study aimed to evaluate YouTube videos on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in terms of their information value and quality. METHODS: In this descriptive study, we rank...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erkin, Yüksel, Hanci, Volkan, Ozduran, Erkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492399
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15412
_version_ 1785076920776392704
author Erkin, Yüksel
Hanci, Volkan
Ozduran, Erkan
author_facet Erkin, Yüksel
Hanci, Volkan
Ozduran, Erkan
author_sort Erkin, Yüksel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: YouTube plays an influential role in disseminating health-related information in the digital age. This study aimed to evaluate YouTube videos on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in terms of their information value and quality. METHODS: In this descriptive study, we ranked the first 100 videos that met the inclusion criteria using the search term “transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation” on October 30, 2022. These videos were classified according to the number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, duration, popularity and content categories. Reliability, quality, and accuracy of the videos were assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria and Modified DISCERN Questionnaire and Global Quality Score (GQS). Video popularity were calculated by the Video Power Index (VPI). RESULTS: Based on the GQS results, we found that 59, 27, and 14 videos had low, intermediate, and high quality, respectively. In addition, based on the JAMA results, 79 and 21 videos had poor and high reliability, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the JAMA, modified DISCERN and GQS scores in terms of the sources of videos (p = 0.226, p = 0.115, p = 0.812). Notably, there was a weak positive correlation between the JAMA scores and the number of views (r = 0.204, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: According to our study results, most YouTube videos on TENS were of low quality and reliability. Additionally, most videos were uploaded from sources created by doctors; the most frequently found content was about the TENS procedure, and content on complications of the procedure became less frequent as the videos became more recent. In particular, it was found that videos uploaded by academics have longer duration. It has been found that reliable videos with high JAMA scores also have high number of views. Accordingly, it can be concluded that videos with higher quality and more reliability that are created by healthcare providers will be more useful for patients seeking information about TENS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10364807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103648072023-07-25 Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation Erkin, Yüksel Hanci, Volkan Ozduran, Erkan PeerJ Anesthesiology and Pain Management BACKGROUND: YouTube plays an influential role in disseminating health-related information in the digital age. This study aimed to evaluate YouTube videos on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in terms of their information value and quality. METHODS: In this descriptive study, we ranked the first 100 videos that met the inclusion criteria using the search term “transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation” on October 30, 2022. These videos were classified according to the number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, duration, popularity and content categories. Reliability, quality, and accuracy of the videos were assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria and Modified DISCERN Questionnaire and Global Quality Score (GQS). Video popularity were calculated by the Video Power Index (VPI). RESULTS: Based on the GQS results, we found that 59, 27, and 14 videos had low, intermediate, and high quality, respectively. In addition, based on the JAMA results, 79 and 21 videos had poor and high reliability, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the JAMA, modified DISCERN and GQS scores in terms of the sources of videos (p = 0.226, p = 0.115, p = 0.812). Notably, there was a weak positive correlation between the JAMA scores and the number of views (r = 0.204, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: According to our study results, most YouTube videos on TENS were of low quality and reliability. Additionally, most videos were uploaded from sources created by doctors; the most frequently found content was about the TENS procedure, and content on complications of the procedure became less frequent as the videos became more recent. In particular, it was found that videos uploaded by academics have longer duration. It has been found that reliable videos with high JAMA scores also have high number of views. Accordingly, it can be concluded that videos with higher quality and more reliability that are created by healthcare providers will be more useful for patients seeking information about TENS. PeerJ Inc. 2023-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10364807/ /pubmed/37492399 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15412 Text en ©2023 Erkin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author (s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology and Pain Management
Erkin, Yüksel
Hanci, Volkan
Ozduran, Erkan
Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_full Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_fullStr Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_short Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_sort evaluation of the reliability and quality of youtube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
topic Anesthesiology and Pain Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492399
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15412
work_keys_str_mv AT erkinyuksel evaluationofthereliabilityandqualityofyoutubevideosasasourceofinformationfortranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation
AT hancivolkan evaluationofthereliabilityandqualityofyoutubevideosasasourceofinformationfortranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation
AT ozduranerkan evaluationofthereliabilityandqualityofyoutubevideosasasourceofinformationfortranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation