Cargando…
The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) to prepare surgical trainees for a pediatric orthopedic surgery procedure: pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to a standard, study guide (SG) group or to a VR training group. Al...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.06.007 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) to prepare surgical trainees for a pediatric orthopedic surgery procedure: pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to a standard, study guide (SG) group or to a VR training group. All participants were provided a technique video and SG; the VR group additionally trained via an Osso VR surgical trainer (ossovr.com) with real-time feedback and coaching from an attending pediatric orthopedic surgeon. Following training, participants performed a SCFE guidewire placement on a SawBones model embedded in a soft-tissue envelope (SawBones model 1161). Participants were asked to achieve “ideal placement” based on the training provided. Participants were evaluated on time, number of pin “in-and outs,” penetration of the articular surface, angle between the pin and the physis, distance from pin tip to subchondral bone and distance from the center-center point of the epiphysis. SETTING: Orthopedic Institute for Children, Los Angeles, CA. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty fourth-year medical students, first- and second-year orthopedic residents without experience with the SCFE procedure. RESULTS: Twenty participants were randomized to SG (n = 10) or VR (n = 10). Average time to final pin placement was 19% shorter in VR group (706 vs 573 seconds, p = 0.26). When compared to SG, the VR group had, on average, 70% less pin in-and-outs (1.7 vs 0.5, p = 0.28), 50% less articular surface penetrations (0.4 vs 0.2, p = 0.36), and 18% smaller distance from pin tip to subchondral bone on lateral view (7.1 vs 5.8 mm, p = 0.42). Moreover, the VR group had a lower average angle deviation between pin and line perpendicular to the physis on coronal view (4.9° vs 2.5°, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VR training is potentially more effective than traditional preparatory methods. This pilot study suggests that VR training may be a viable surgical training tool, which may alleviate constraints of time, money, and safety concerns with resultant broad applicability for surgical education. |
---|