Cargando…
The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) to prepare surgical trainees for a pediatric orthopedic surgery procedure: pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to a standard, study guide (SG) group or to a VR training group. Al...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.06.007 |
_version_ | 1785076927520833536 |
---|---|
author | Cevallos, Nicolas Zukotynski, Brian Greig, Danielle Silva, Mauricio Thompson, Rachel M. |
author_facet | Cevallos, Nicolas Zukotynski, Brian Greig, Danielle Silva, Mauricio Thompson, Rachel M. |
author_sort | Cevallos, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) to prepare surgical trainees for a pediatric orthopedic surgery procedure: pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to a standard, study guide (SG) group or to a VR training group. All participants were provided a technique video and SG; the VR group additionally trained via an Osso VR surgical trainer (ossovr.com) with real-time feedback and coaching from an attending pediatric orthopedic surgeon. Following training, participants performed a SCFE guidewire placement on a SawBones model embedded in a soft-tissue envelope (SawBones model 1161). Participants were asked to achieve “ideal placement” based on the training provided. Participants were evaluated on time, number of pin “in-and outs,” penetration of the articular surface, angle between the pin and the physis, distance from pin tip to subchondral bone and distance from the center-center point of the epiphysis. SETTING: Orthopedic Institute for Children, Los Angeles, CA. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty fourth-year medical students, first- and second-year orthopedic residents without experience with the SCFE procedure. RESULTS: Twenty participants were randomized to SG (n = 10) or VR (n = 10). Average time to final pin placement was 19% shorter in VR group (706 vs 573 seconds, p = 0.26). When compared to SG, the VR group had, on average, 70% less pin in-and-outs (1.7 vs 0.5, p = 0.28), 50% less articular surface penetrations (0.4 vs 0.2, p = 0.36), and 18% smaller distance from pin tip to subchondral bone on lateral view (7.1 vs 5.8 mm, p = 0.42). Moreover, the VR group had a lower average angle deviation between pin and line perpendicular to the physis on coronal view (4.9° vs 2.5°, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VR training is potentially more effective than traditional preparatory methods. This pilot study suggests that VR training may be a viable surgical training tool, which may alleviate constraints of time, money, and safety concerns with resultant broad applicability for surgical education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10364838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103648382023-07-24 The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training Cevallos, Nicolas Zukotynski, Brian Greig, Danielle Silva, Mauricio Thompson, Rachel M. J Surg Educ Article OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) to prepare surgical trainees for a pediatric orthopedic surgery procedure: pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to a standard, study guide (SG) group or to a VR training group. All participants were provided a technique video and SG; the VR group additionally trained via an Osso VR surgical trainer (ossovr.com) with real-time feedback and coaching from an attending pediatric orthopedic surgeon. Following training, participants performed a SCFE guidewire placement on a SawBones model embedded in a soft-tissue envelope (SawBones model 1161). Participants were asked to achieve “ideal placement” based on the training provided. Participants were evaluated on time, number of pin “in-and outs,” penetration of the articular surface, angle between the pin and the physis, distance from pin tip to subchondral bone and distance from the center-center point of the epiphysis. SETTING: Orthopedic Institute for Children, Los Angeles, CA. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty fourth-year medical students, first- and second-year orthopedic residents without experience with the SCFE procedure. RESULTS: Twenty participants were randomized to SG (n = 10) or VR (n = 10). Average time to final pin placement was 19% shorter in VR group (706 vs 573 seconds, p = 0.26). When compared to SG, the VR group had, on average, 70% less pin in-and-outs (1.7 vs 0.5, p = 0.28), 50% less articular surface penetrations (0.4 vs 0.2, p = 0.36), and 18% smaller distance from pin tip to subchondral bone on lateral view (7.1 vs 5.8 mm, p = 0.42). Moreover, the VR group had a lower average angle deviation between pin and line perpendicular to the physis on coronal view (4.9° vs 2.5°, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VR training is potentially more effective than traditional preparatory methods. This pilot study suggests that VR training may be a viable surgical training tool, which may alleviate constraints of time, money, and safety concerns with resultant broad applicability for surgical education. 2022 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10364838/ /pubmed/35821110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.06.007 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Article Cevallos, Nicolas Zukotynski, Brian Greig, Danielle Silva, Mauricio Thompson, Rachel M. The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training |
title | The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training |
title_full | The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training |
title_fullStr | The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training |
title_full_unstemmed | The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training |
title_short | The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training |
title_sort | utility of virtual reality in orthopedic surgical training |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.06.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cevallosnicolas theutilityofvirtualrealityinorthopedicsurgicaltraining AT zukotynskibrian theutilityofvirtualrealityinorthopedicsurgicaltraining AT greigdanielle theutilityofvirtualrealityinorthopedicsurgicaltraining AT silvamauricio theutilityofvirtualrealityinorthopedicsurgicaltraining AT thompsonrachelm theutilityofvirtualrealityinorthopedicsurgicaltraining AT cevallosnicolas utilityofvirtualrealityinorthopedicsurgicaltraining AT zukotynskibrian utilityofvirtualrealityinorthopedicsurgicaltraining AT greigdanielle utilityofvirtualrealityinorthopedicsurgicaltraining AT silvamauricio utilityofvirtualrealityinorthopedicsurgicaltraining AT thompsonrachelm utilityofvirtualrealityinorthopedicsurgicaltraining |