Cargando…

Utility of whole‐exome sequencing for patients with multiple congenital anomalies with or without intellectual disability/developmental delay in East Asia population

BACKGROUND: Congenital anomalies (CAs) with or without intellectual disability (ID)/developmental delay (DD) comprise a heterogeneous spectrum of diseases that affect approximately 3% of live births worldwide. Recently, whole‐exome sequencing (WES) demonstrated the highly heterogeneous genetic cause...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Rai‐Hseng, Lee, Chen‐Hao, Chien, Yin‐Hsiu, Lin, Shuan‐Pei, Hung, Miao‐Zi, Chen, Nai‐Chi, Lin, Yi‐Lin, Hwu, Wuh‐Liang, Lee, Ni‐Chung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.2160
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Congenital anomalies (CAs) with or without intellectual disability (ID)/developmental delay (DD) comprise a heterogeneous spectrum of diseases that affect approximately 3% of live births worldwide. Recently, whole‐exome sequencing (WES) demonstrated the highly heterogeneous genetic causes of CAs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a referral system to increase the yield of WES for CAs. METHODS: From August 2018 to July 2019, patients with CAs, with or without ID/DD, after excluding gross chromosomal aberrations, were referred to geneticists in two medical centers. Variant prioritization was conducted with an AI‐assisted tool for whole exomes or a CA‐related gene panel. RESULTS: Forty patients (27 males and 13 females) with CAs were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 4.71 years (range, 0.01–18.2). Pathogenic variants in 14 genes were discovered in 16 patients (three patients with CHD7 and 13 patients with one gene each of ATP6V1B2, TAF6, COL4A3BP, ANKH, BMP2, SMARCA4, CUL4B, PGAP3, SOX11, FBN2, PTPN11, SOS1, or PROKR2), with a positive diagnostic rate of 40%. Among the 16 positive cases, 13 (81%) also had ID/DD. The inheritance was autosomal dominant in 13 (81%), autosomal recessive in two (13%), and X‐linked in one (6%). Only five patients received a correct clinical diagnosis before WES. The analyses of patients with a negative genetic diagnosis revealed a phenotype and gene mutation load similar to those of the positive‐finding patients but with a lower percentage of ID/DD. CONCLUSIONS: The careful selection of patients by experienced geneticists and the exclusion of chromosomal aberrations raises the positive rate of the molecular diagnosis for CAs to 40%. However, more than half of the patients with CAs still do not have a genetic diagnosis by current technologies.