Cargando…

A Simple Preoperative Score Predicting Failure Following Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Proper patient selection is crucial for the outcome of surgically treated degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). Nevertheless, there is still not a clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment option for patients with DLSS. PURPOSE. To investigate the treatment failure rate and introduce a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dimitriou, Dimitris, Winkler, Elin, Weber, Sabrina, Haupt, Samuel, Betz, Michael, Farshad, Mazda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36728033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004584
_version_ 1785076951294148608
author Dimitriou, Dimitris
Winkler, Elin
Weber, Sabrina
Haupt, Samuel
Betz, Michael
Farshad, Mazda
author_facet Dimitriou, Dimitris
Winkler, Elin
Weber, Sabrina
Haupt, Samuel
Betz, Michael
Farshad, Mazda
author_sort Dimitriou, Dimitris
collection PubMed
description Proper patient selection is crucial for the outcome of surgically treated degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). Nevertheless, there is still not a clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment option for patients with DLSS. PURPOSE. To investigate the treatment failure rate and introduce a simple, preoperative score to aid surgical decision-making. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING. Retrospective observational study PATIENT SAMPLE. Four hundred forty-five patients who underwent surgical decompression for DLSS. OUTCOME MEASURES. Treatment failure (defined as conversion to a fusion of a previously decompressed level) of lumbar decompression MATERIALS AND METHODS. Several risk factors associated with worse outcomes and treatment failures, such as age, body mass index, smoking status, previous surgery, low back pain (LBP), facet joint effusion, disk degeneration, fatty infiltration of the paraspinal muscles, the presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis and the facet angulation, were investigated. RESULTS. At a mean follow-up of 44±31 months, 6.5% (29/445) of the patients underwent revision surgery with spinal fusion at an average of 3±9 months following the lumbar decompression due to low back or leg pain. The baseline LBP (≥7) [odds ratio (OR)=5.4, P<0.001], the presence of facet joint effusion (>2 mm) in magnetic resonance imaging (OR=4.2, P<0.001), and disk degeneration (Pfirrmann >4) (OR=3.2, P=0.03) were associated with an increased risk for treatment failure following decompression for DLSS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that a score≥6 points yielded a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 64% for predicting a treatment failure following lumbar decompression for DLSS in the present cohort. CONCLUSIONS. The newly introduced score quantifying amounts of LBP, facet effusions, and disk degeneration, could predict treatment failure and the need for revision surgery for DLSS patients undergoing lumbar decompression without fusion. Patients with scores >6 have a high chance of needing fusion following decompression surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE. Retrospective observational study, Level III
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10364961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103649612023-07-25 A Simple Preoperative Score Predicting Failure Following Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Dimitriou, Dimitris Winkler, Elin Weber, Sabrina Haupt, Samuel Betz, Michael Farshad, Mazda Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Clinical Case Series Proper patient selection is crucial for the outcome of surgically treated degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). Nevertheless, there is still not a clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment option for patients with DLSS. PURPOSE. To investigate the treatment failure rate and introduce a simple, preoperative score to aid surgical decision-making. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING. Retrospective observational study PATIENT SAMPLE. Four hundred forty-five patients who underwent surgical decompression for DLSS. OUTCOME MEASURES. Treatment failure (defined as conversion to a fusion of a previously decompressed level) of lumbar decompression MATERIALS AND METHODS. Several risk factors associated with worse outcomes and treatment failures, such as age, body mass index, smoking status, previous surgery, low back pain (LBP), facet joint effusion, disk degeneration, fatty infiltration of the paraspinal muscles, the presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis and the facet angulation, were investigated. RESULTS. At a mean follow-up of 44±31 months, 6.5% (29/445) of the patients underwent revision surgery with spinal fusion at an average of 3±9 months following the lumbar decompression due to low back or leg pain. The baseline LBP (≥7) [odds ratio (OR)=5.4, P<0.001], the presence of facet joint effusion (>2 mm) in magnetic resonance imaging (OR=4.2, P<0.001), and disk degeneration (Pfirrmann >4) (OR=3.2, P=0.03) were associated with an increased risk for treatment failure following decompression for DLSS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that a score≥6 points yielded a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 64% for predicting a treatment failure following lumbar decompression for DLSS in the present cohort. CONCLUSIONS. The newly introduced score quantifying amounts of LBP, facet effusions, and disk degeneration, could predict treatment failure and the need for revision surgery for DLSS patients undergoing lumbar decompression without fusion. Patients with scores >6 have a high chance of needing fusion following decompression surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE. Retrospective observational study, Level III Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-05-01 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10364961/ /pubmed/36728033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004584 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Clinical Case Series
Dimitriou, Dimitris
Winkler, Elin
Weber, Sabrina
Haupt, Samuel
Betz, Michael
Farshad, Mazda
A Simple Preoperative Score Predicting Failure Following Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title A Simple Preoperative Score Predicting Failure Following Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_full A Simple Preoperative Score Predicting Failure Following Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_fullStr A Simple Preoperative Score Predicting Failure Following Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed A Simple Preoperative Score Predicting Failure Following Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_short A Simple Preoperative Score Predicting Failure Following Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_sort simple preoperative score predicting failure following decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
topic Clinical Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10364961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36728033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004584
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitrioudimitris asimplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT winklerelin asimplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT webersabrina asimplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT hauptsamuel asimplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT betzmichael asimplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT farshadmazda asimplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT dimitrioudimitris simplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT winklerelin simplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT webersabrina simplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT hauptsamuel simplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT betzmichael simplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT farshadmazda simplepreoperativescorepredictingfailurefollowingdecompressionsurgeryfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis