Cargando…
Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning
Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2022.866974 |
_version_ | 1785076979483017216 |
---|---|
author | Lucena, Oeslle Borges, Pedro Cardoso, Jorge Ashkan, Keyoumars Sparks, Rachel Ourselin, Sebastien |
author_facet | Lucena, Oeslle Borges, Pedro Cardoso, Jorge Ashkan, Keyoumars Sparks, Rachel Ourselin, Sebastien |
author_sort | Lucena, Oeslle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpretation difficult. As a result, in clinical practice direct electrical stimulation is necessary to precisely locate WM tracts during surgery. A measure of WM tract segmentation unreliability could be important to guide surgical planning and operations. In this study, we use deep learning to perform reliable tract segmentation in combination with uncertainty quantification to measure segmentation unreliability. We use a 3D U-Net to segment white matter tracts. We then estimate model and data uncertainty using test time dropout and test time augmentation, respectively. We use a volume-based calibration approach to compute representative predicted probabilities from the estimated uncertainties. In our findings, we obtain a Dice of ≈0.82 which is comparable to the state-of-the-art for multi-label segmentation and Hausdorff distance <10mm. We demonstrate a high positive correlation between volume variance and segmentation errors, which indicates a good measure of reliability for tract segmentation ad uncertainty estimation. Finally, we show that calibrated predicted volumes are more likely to encompass the ground truth segmentation volume than uncalibrated predicted volumes. This study is a step toward more informed and reliable WM tract segmentation for clinical decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10365092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103650922023-07-25 Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning Lucena, Oeslle Borges, Pedro Cardoso, Jorge Ashkan, Keyoumars Sparks, Rachel Ourselin, Sebastien Front Radiol Radiology Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpretation difficult. As a result, in clinical practice direct electrical stimulation is necessary to precisely locate WM tracts during surgery. A measure of WM tract segmentation unreliability could be important to guide surgical planning and operations. In this study, we use deep learning to perform reliable tract segmentation in combination with uncertainty quantification to measure segmentation unreliability. We use a 3D U-Net to segment white matter tracts. We then estimate model and data uncertainty using test time dropout and test time augmentation, respectively. We use a volume-based calibration approach to compute representative predicted probabilities from the estimated uncertainties. In our findings, we obtain a Dice of ≈0.82 which is comparable to the state-of-the-art for multi-label segmentation and Hausdorff distance <10mm. We demonstrate a high positive correlation between volume variance and segmentation errors, which indicates a good measure of reliability for tract segmentation ad uncertainty estimation. Finally, we show that calibrated predicted volumes are more likely to encompass the ground truth segmentation volume than uncalibrated predicted volumes. This study is a step toward more informed and reliable WM tract segmentation for clinical decision-making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10365092/ /pubmed/37492653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2022.866974 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lucena, Borges, Cardoso, Ashkan, Sparks and Ourselin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Radiology Lucena, Oeslle Borges, Pedro Cardoso, Jorge Ashkan, Keyoumars Sparks, Rachel Ourselin, Sebastien Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning |
title | Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning |
title_full | Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning |
title_fullStr | Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning |
title_short | Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning |
title_sort | informative and reliable tract segmentation for preoperative planning |
topic | Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2022.866974 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucenaoeslle informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning AT borgespedro informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning AT cardosojorge informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning AT ashkankeyoumars informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning AT sparksrachel informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning AT ourselinsebastien informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning |