Cargando…

Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning

Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucena, Oeslle, Borges, Pedro, Cardoso, Jorge, Ashkan, Keyoumars, Sparks, Rachel, Ourselin, Sebastien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492653
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2022.866974
_version_ 1785076979483017216
author Lucena, Oeslle
Borges, Pedro
Cardoso, Jorge
Ashkan, Keyoumars
Sparks, Rachel
Ourselin, Sebastien
author_facet Lucena, Oeslle
Borges, Pedro
Cardoso, Jorge
Ashkan, Keyoumars
Sparks, Rachel
Ourselin, Sebastien
author_sort Lucena, Oeslle
collection PubMed
description Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpretation difficult. As a result, in clinical practice direct electrical stimulation is necessary to precisely locate WM tracts during surgery. A measure of WM tract segmentation unreliability could be important to guide surgical planning and operations. In this study, we use deep learning to perform reliable tract segmentation in combination with uncertainty quantification to measure segmentation unreliability. We use a 3D U-Net to segment white matter tracts. We then estimate model and data uncertainty using test time dropout and test time augmentation, respectively. We use a volume-based calibration approach to compute representative predicted probabilities from the estimated uncertainties. In our findings, we obtain a Dice of ≈0.82 which is comparable to the state-of-the-art for multi-label segmentation and Hausdorff distance <10mm. We demonstrate a high positive correlation between volume variance and segmentation errors, which indicates a good measure of reliability for tract segmentation ad uncertainty estimation. Finally, we show that calibrated predicted volumes are more likely to encompass the ground truth segmentation volume than uncalibrated predicted volumes. This study is a step toward more informed and reliable WM tract segmentation for clinical decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10365092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103650922023-07-25 Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning Lucena, Oeslle Borges, Pedro Cardoso, Jorge Ashkan, Keyoumars Sparks, Rachel Ourselin, Sebastien Front Radiol Radiology Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpretation difficult. As a result, in clinical practice direct electrical stimulation is necessary to precisely locate WM tracts during surgery. A measure of WM tract segmentation unreliability could be important to guide surgical planning and operations. In this study, we use deep learning to perform reliable tract segmentation in combination with uncertainty quantification to measure segmentation unreliability. We use a 3D U-Net to segment white matter tracts. We then estimate model and data uncertainty using test time dropout and test time augmentation, respectively. We use a volume-based calibration approach to compute representative predicted probabilities from the estimated uncertainties. In our findings, we obtain a Dice of ≈0.82 which is comparable to the state-of-the-art for multi-label segmentation and Hausdorff distance <10mm. We demonstrate a high positive correlation between volume variance and segmentation errors, which indicates a good measure of reliability for tract segmentation ad uncertainty estimation. Finally, we show that calibrated predicted volumes are more likely to encompass the ground truth segmentation volume than uncalibrated predicted volumes. This study is a step toward more informed and reliable WM tract segmentation for clinical decision-making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10365092/ /pubmed/37492653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2022.866974 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lucena, Borges, Cardoso, Ashkan, Sparks and Ourselin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Radiology
Lucena, Oeslle
Borges, Pedro
Cardoso, Jorge
Ashkan, Keyoumars
Sparks, Rachel
Ourselin, Sebastien
Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning
title Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning
title_full Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning
title_fullStr Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning
title_full_unstemmed Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning
title_short Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning
title_sort informative and reliable tract segmentation for preoperative planning
topic Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492653
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2022.866974
work_keys_str_mv AT lucenaoeslle informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning
AT borgespedro informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning
AT cardosojorge informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning
AT ashkankeyoumars informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning
AT sparksrachel informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning
AT ourselinsebastien informativeandreliabletractsegmentationforpreoperativeplanning