Cargando…

Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County

AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) might be the first finding of cardiovascular diseases but also the prerequisite for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The prognosis for patients with LBBB and the implications of CRT in an unsel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gatti, Paolo, Lind, Stefan, Kristjánsdóttir, Ingibjörg, Azari, Ava, Savarese, Gianluigi, Anselmino, Matteo, Linde, Cecilia, Gadler, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad192
_version_ 1785077046548889600
author Gatti, Paolo
Lind, Stefan
Kristjánsdóttir, Ingibjörg
Azari, Ava
Savarese, Gianluigi
Anselmino, Matteo
Linde, Cecilia
Gadler, Fredrik
author_facet Gatti, Paolo
Lind, Stefan
Kristjánsdóttir, Ingibjörg
Azari, Ava
Savarese, Gianluigi
Anselmino, Matteo
Linde, Cecilia
Gadler, Fredrik
author_sort Gatti, Paolo
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) might be the first finding of cardiovascular diseases but also the prerequisite for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The prognosis for patients with LBBB and the implications of CRT in an unselected real-world setting are the focus of our study. METHODS AND RESULTS: A central electrocardiogram (ECG) database and national registers have been screened to identify patients with LBBB. Predictors of HF and the use of CRT were identified with Cox models. The hazard ratios (HRs) of death, cardiovascular death (CVD), and HF hospitalization (HFH) were estimated according to CRT use. Of 5359 patients with LBBB and QRS > 150 ms, median age 76 years, 36% were female. At the time of index ECG, 41% had a previous history of HF and 27% developed HF. Among 1053 patients with a class I indication for CRT, only 60% received CRT with a median delay of 137 days, and it was associated with a lower risk of death [HR: 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–0.57], CVD (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.35–0.63), and HFH (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.48–0.66). The age of over 75 years and the diagnosis of dementia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were predictors of CRT non-use, while having a pacing/defibrillator device independently predicted CRT use. CONCLUSION: In an unselected LBBB population, CRT is underused but of great value for HF patients. Therefore, it is crucial to find ways of better implementing and understanding CRT utilization and characteristics that influence the management of our patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10365846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103658462023-07-25 Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County Gatti, Paolo Lind, Stefan Kristjánsdóttir, Ingibjörg Azari, Ava Savarese, Gianluigi Anselmino, Matteo Linde, Cecilia Gadler, Fredrik Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) might be the first finding of cardiovascular diseases but also the prerequisite for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The prognosis for patients with LBBB and the implications of CRT in an unselected real-world setting are the focus of our study. METHODS AND RESULTS: A central electrocardiogram (ECG) database and national registers have been screened to identify patients with LBBB. Predictors of HF and the use of CRT were identified with Cox models. The hazard ratios (HRs) of death, cardiovascular death (CVD), and HF hospitalization (HFH) were estimated according to CRT use. Of 5359 patients with LBBB and QRS > 150 ms, median age 76 years, 36% were female. At the time of index ECG, 41% had a previous history of HF and 27% developed HF. Among 1053 patients with a class I indication for CRT, only 60% received CRT with a median delay of 137 days, and it was associated with a lower risk of death [HR: 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–0.57], CVD (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.35–0.63), and HFH (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.48–0.66). The age of over 75 years and the diagnosis of dementia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were predictors of CRT non-use, while having a pacing/defibrillator device independently predicted CRT use. CONCLUSION: In an unselected LBBB population, CRT is underused but of great value for HF patients. Therefore, it is crucial to find ways of better implementing and understanding CRT utilization and characteristics that influence the management of our patients. Oxford University Press 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10365846/ /pubmed/37403689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad192 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Gatti, Paolo
Lind, Stefan
Kristjánsdóttir, Ingibjörg
Azari, Ava
Savarese, Gianluigi
Anselmino, Matteo
Linde, Cecilia
Gadler, Fredrik
Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County
title Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County
title_full Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County
title_fullStr Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County
title_short Prognosis of CRT-treated and CRT-untreated unselected population with LBBB in Stockholm County
title_sort prognosis of crt-treated and crt-untreated unselected population with lbbb in stockholm county
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad192
work_keys_str_mv AT gattipaolo prognosisofcrttreatedandcrtuntreatedunselectedpopulationwithlbbbinstockholmcounty
AT lindstefan prognosisofcrttreatedandcrtuntreatedunselectedpopulationwithlbbbinstockholmcounty
AT kristjansdottiringibjorg prognosisofcrttreatedandcrtuntreatedunselectedpopulationwithlbbbinstockholmcounty
AT azariava prognosisofcrttreatedandcrtuntreatedunselectedpopulationwithlbbbinstockholmcounty
AT savaresegianluigi prognosisofcrttreatedandcrtuntreatedunselectedpopulationwithlbbbinstockholmcounty
AT anselminomatteo prognosisofcrttreatedandcrtuntreatedunselectedpopulationwithlbbbinstockholmcounty
AT lindececilia prognosisofcrttreatedandcrtuntreatedunselectedpopulationwithlbbbinstockholmcounty
AT gadlerfredrik prognosisofcrttreatedandcrtuntreatedunselectedpopulationwithlbbbinstockholmcounty