Cargando…

Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists are essential team members in critical care and contribute to the safety of pharmacotherapy for this vulnerable group of patients, but little is known about remote pharmacy services in intensive care units (ICU). AIM: We compared the acceptance of pharmacist interventions (PI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilgarth, Heike, Wichmann, Dominic, Baehr, Michael, Kluge, Stefan, Langebrake, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37029858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01559-z
_version_ 1785077082086178816
author Hilgarth, Heike
Wichmann, Dominic
Baehr, Michael
Kluge, Stefan
Langebrake, Claudia
author_facet Hilgarth, Heike
Wichmann, Dominic
Baehr, Michael
Kluge, Stefan
Langebrake, Claudia
author_sort Hilgarth, Heike
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pharmacists are essential team members in critical care and contribute to the safety of pharmacotherapy for this vulnerable group of patients, but little is known about remote pharmacy services in intensive care units (ICU). AIM: We compared the acceptance of pharmacist interventions (PI) in ICU patients working remotely with ward-based service. We evaluated both pharmacy services, including further information on PI, including reasons, actions and impact. METHOD: Over 5 months, a prospective single-centre observational study divided into two sequential phases (remote and ward-based) was performed on two ICU wards at a university hospital. After a structured medication review, PI identified were addressed to healthcare professionals. For documentation, the national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) was used. Acceptance was used as the primary endpoint. All data were analysed using descriptive methods. RESULTS: In total, 605 PI resulted from 1023 medication reviews. Acceptance was 75% (228/304) for remote and 88% (265/301; p < 0.001) for ward-based services. Non-inferiority was not demonstrated. Most commonly, drug- (44% and 36%) and dose-related (36% and 35%) reasons were documented. Frequently, drugs were stopped/paused (31% and 29%) and dosage changed (31% and 30%). PI were classified as “error, no harm” (National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention [NCC MERP] categories B to D; 83% and 81%). The severity and clinical relevance were at least ranked as "significant" (68% and 66%) and at least as "important" for patients (77% and 83%). CONCLUSION: The way pharmacy services are provided influences the acceptance of PI. Remote pharmacy services may be seen as an addition, but acceptance rates in remote services failed to show non-inferiority. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-023-01559-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10366025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103660252023-07-26 Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services Hilgarth, Heike Wichmann, Dominic Baehr, Michael Kluge, Stefan Langebrake, Claudia Int J Clin Pharm Research Article BACKGROUND: Pharmacists are essential team members in critical care and contribute to the safety of pharmacotherapy for this vulnerable group of patients, but little is known about remote pharmacy services in intensive care units (ICU). AIM: We compared the acceptance of pharmacist interventions (PI) in ICU patients working remotely with ward-based service. We evaluated both pharmacy services, including further information on PI, including reasons, actions and impact. METHOD: Over 5 months, a prospective single-centre observational study divided into two sequential phases (remote and ward-based) was performed on two ICU wards at a university hospital. After a structured medication review, PI identified were addressed to healthcare professionals. For documentation, the national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) was used. Acceptance was used as the primary endpoint. All data were analysed using descriptive methods. RESULTS: In total, 605 PI resulted from 1023 medication reviews. Acceptance was 75% (228/304) for remote and 88% (265/301; p < 0.001) for ward-based services. Non-inferiority was not demonstrated. Most commonly, drug- (44% and 36%) and dose-related (36% and 35%) reasons were documented. Frequently, drugs were stopped/paused (31% and 29%) and dosage changed (31% and 30%). PI were classified as “error, no harm” (National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention [NCC MERP] categories B to D; 83% and 81%). The severity and clinical relevance were at least ranked as "significant" (68% and 66%) and at least as "important" for patients (77% and 83%). CONCLUSION: The way pharmacy services are provided influences the acceptance of PI. Remote pharmacy services may be seen as an addition, but acceptance rates in remote services failed to show non-inferiority. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-023-01559-z. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10366025/ /pubmed/37029858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01559-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Hilgarth, Heike
Wichmann, Dominic
Baehr, Michael
Kluge, Stefan
Langebrake, Claudia
Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services
title Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services
title_full Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services
title_fullStr Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services
title_full_unstemmed Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services
title_short Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services
title_sort clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37029858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01559-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hilgarthheike clinicalpharmacyservicesincriticalcareresultsofanobservationalstudycomparingwardbasedwithremotepharmacyservices
AT wichmanndominic clinicalpharmacyservicesincriticalcareresultsofanobservationalstudycomparingwardbasedwithremotepharmacyservices
AT baehrmichael clinicalpharmacyservicesincriticalcareresultsofanobservationalstudycomparingwardbasedwithremotepharmacyservices
AT klugestefan clinicalpharmacyservicesincriticalcareresultsofanobservationalstudycomparingwardbasedwithremotepharmacyservices
AT langebrakeclaudia clinicalpharmacyservicesincriticalcareresultsofanobservationalstudycomparingwardbasedwithremotepharmacyservices