Cargando…
Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services
BACKGROUND: Pharmacists are essential team members in critical care and contribute to the safety of pharmacotherapy for this vulnerable group of patients, but little is known about remote pharmacy services in intensive care units (ICU). AIM: We compared the acceptance of pharmacist interventions (PI...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37029858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01559-z |
_version_ | 1785077082086178816 |
---|---|
author | Hilgarth, Heike Wichmann, Dominic Baehr, Michael Kluge, Stefan Langebrake, Claudia |
author_facet | Hilgarth, Heike Wichmann, Dominic Baehr, Michael Kluge, Stefan Langebrake, Claudia |
author_sort | Hilgarth, Heike |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pharmacists are essential team members in critical care and contribute to the safety of pharmacotherapy for this vulnerable group of patients, but little is known about remote pharmacy services in intensive care units (ICU). AIM: We compared the acceptance of pharmacist interventions (PI) in ICU patients working remotely with ward-based service. We evaluated both pharmacy services, including further information on PI, including reasons, actions and impact. METHOD: Over 5 months, a prospective single-centre observational study divided into two sequential phases (remote and ward-based) was performed on two ICU wards at a university hospital. After a structured medication review, PI identified were addressed to healthcare professionals. For documentation, the national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) was used. Acceptance was used as the primary endpoint. All data were analysed using descriptive methods. RESULTS: In total, 605 PI resulted from 1023 medication reviews. Acceptance was 75% (228/304) for remote and 88% (265/301; p < 0.001) for ward-based services. Non-inferiority was not demonstrated. Most commonly, drug- (44% and 36%) and dose-related (36% and 35%) reasons were documented. Frequently, drugs were stopped/paused (31% and 29%) and dosage changed (31% and 30%). PI were classified as “error, no harm” (National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention [NCC MERP] categories B to D; 83% and 81%). The severity and clinical relevance were at least ranked as "significant" (68% and 66%) and at least as "important" for patients (77% and 83%). CONCLUSION: The way pharmacy services are provided influences the acceptance of PI. Remote pharmacy services may be seen as an addition, but acceptance rates in remote services failed to show non-inferiority. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-023-01559-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10366025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103660252023-07-26 Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services Hilgarth, Heike Wichmann, Dominic Baehr, Michael Kluge, Stefan Langebrake, Claudia Int J Clin Pharm Research Article BACKGROUND: Pharmacists are essential team members in critical care and contribute to the safety of pharmacotherapy for this vulnerable group of patients, but little is known about remote pharmacy services in intensive care units (ICU). AIM: We compared the acceptance of pharmacist interventions (PI) in ICU patients working remotely with ward-based service. We evaluated both pharmacy services, including further information on PI, including reasons, actions and impact. METHOD: Over 5 months, a prospective single-centre observational study divided into two sequential phases (remote and ward-based) was performed on two ICU wards at a university hospital. After a structured medication review, PI identified were addressed to healthcare professionals. For documentation, the national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) was used. Acceptance was used as the primary endpoint. All data were analysed using descriptive methods. RESULTS: In total, 605 PI resulted from 1023 medication reviews. Acceptance was 75% (228/304) for remote and 88% (265/301; p < 0.001) for ward-based services. Non-inferiority was not demonstrated. Most commonly, drug- (44% and 36%) and dose-related (36% and 35%) reasons were documented. Frequently, drugs were stopped/paused (31% and 29%) and dosage changed (31% and 30%). PI were classified as “error, no harm” (National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention [NCC MERP] categories B to D; 83% and 81%). The severity and clinical relevance were at least ranked as "significant" (68% and 66%) and at least as "important" for patients (77% and 83%). CONCLUSION: The way pharmacy services are provided influences the acceptance of PI. Remote pharmacy services may be seen as an addition, but acceptance rates in remote services failed to show non-inferiority. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-023-01559-z. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10366025/ /pubmed/37029858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01559-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hilgarth, Heike Wichmann, Dominic Baehr, Michael Kluge, Stefan Langebrake, Claudia Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services |
title | Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services |
title_full | Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services |
title_fullStr | Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services |
title_short | Clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services |
title_sort | clinical pharmacy services in critical care: results of an observational study comparing ward-based with remote pharmacy services |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37029858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01559-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hilgarthheike clinicalpharmacyservicesincriticalcareresultsofanobservationalstudycomparingwardbasedwithremotepharmacyservices AT wichmanndominic clinicalpharmacyservicesincriticalcareresultsofanobservationalstudycomparingwardbasedwithremotepharmacyservices AT baehrmichael clinicalpharmacyservicesincriticalcareresultsofanobservationalstudycomparingwardbasedwithremotepharmacyservices AT klugestefan clinicalpharmacyservicesincriticalcareresultsofanobservationalstudycomparingwardbasedwithremotepharmacyservices AT langebrakeclaudia clinicalpharmacyservicesincriticalcareresultsofanobservationalstudycomparingwardbasedwithremotepharmacyservices |