Cargando…

Dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy with intravenous nefopam results in faster pain recovery than static compression cryotherapy with oral nefopam: post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy (DICC) (CryoNov®) with an intravenous nefopam-based pain management protocol (DCIVNPP) in reducing post-operative pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) compared to static compression cryo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moussa, Mohamad K., Lefevre, Nicolas, Valentin, Eugenie, Meyer, Alain, Grimaud, Olivier, Bohu, Yoan, Gerometta, Antoinne, Khiami, Frederic, Hardy, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37486444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00639-3
_version_ 1785077086407360512
author Moussa, Mohamad K.
Lefevre, Nicolas
Valentin, Eugenie
Meyer, Alain
Grimaud, Olivier
Bohu, Yoan
Gerometta, Antoinne
Khiami, Frederic
Hardy, Alexandre
author_facet Moussa, Mohamad K.
Lefevre, Nicolas
Valentin, Eugenie
Meyer, Alain
Grimaud, Olivier
Bohu, Yoan
Gerometta, Antoinne
Khiami, Frederic
Hardy, Alexandre
author_sort Moussa, Mohamad K.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy (DICC) (CryoNov®) with an intravenous nefopam-based pain management protocol (DCIVNPP) in reducing post-operative pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) compared to static compression cryotherapy (SCC) (Igloo®) and oral Nefopam. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data including 676 patients who underwent primary ACLR in 2022. Patients were either in the DCIVNPP group or in the SCC (control group), and were matched for age, sex, and Lysholm and Tegner scores (338 per arm). The primary outcome was pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS), analyzed in relation to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for VAS. The secondary outcome was side effects. RESULTS: Postoperative pain in the DCIVNPP group was less severe on the VAS than in the control group (p < 0.05). The maximum difference in the VAS between groups was 0.57, which is less than the MCID threshold for VAS. The DCIVNPP group crossed the PASS threshold for VAS on Day 3, sooner than the control group. The side effect profiles were similar in both groups except for higher rates of dizziness and malaise in the DCIVNPP group, and higher rates of abdominal pain in the control group. Most of the side effects decreased over time in both groups, with no significant side effects after Day 3. CONCLUSION: DCIVNPP effectively allows for faster pain recovery than in the control group. The difference in side effects between the protocols may be due to mode of administration of nefopam. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10366045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103660452023-07-26 Dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy with intravenous nefopam results in faster pain recovery than static compression cryotherapy with oral nefopam: post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Moussa, Mohamad K. Lefevre, Nicolas Valentin, Eugenie Meyer, Alain Grimaud, Olivier Bohu, Yoan Gerometta, Antoinne Khiami, Frederic Hardy, Alexandre J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy (DICC) (CryoNov®) with an intravenous nefopam-based pain management protocol (DCIVNPP) in reducing post-operative pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) compared to static compression cryotherapy (SCC) (Igloo®) and oral Nefopam. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data including 676 patients who underwent primary ACLR in 2022. Patients were either in the DCIVNPP group or in the SCC (control group), and were matched for age, sex, and Lysholm and Tegner scores (338 per arm). The primary outcome was pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS), analyzed in relation to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for VAS. The secondary outcome was side effects. RESULTS: Postoperative pain in the DCIVNPP group was less severe on the VAS than in the control group (p < 0.05). The maximum difference in the VAS between groups was 0.57, which is less than the MCID threshold for VAS. The DCIVNPP group crossed the PASS threshold for VAS on Day 3, sooner than the control group. The side effect profiles were similar in both groups except for higher rates of dizziness and malaise in the DCIVNPP group, and higher rates of abdominal pain in the control group. Most of the side effects decreased over time in both groups, with no significant side effects after Day 3. CONCLUSION: DCIVNPP effectively allows for faster pain recovery than in the control group. The difference in side effects between the protocols may be due to mode of administration of nefopam. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10366045/ /pubmed/37486444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00639-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Moussa, Mohamad K.
Lefevre, Nicolas
Valentin, Eugenie
Meyer, Alain
Grimaud, Olivier
Bohu, Yoan
Gerometta, Antoinne
Khiami, Frederic
Hardy, Alexandre
Dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy with intravenous nefopam results in faster pain recovery than static compression cryotherapy with oral nefopam: post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title Dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy with intravenous nefopam results in faster pain recovery than static compression cryotherapy with oral nefopam: post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full Dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy with intravenous nefopam results in faster pain recovery than static compression cryotherapy with oral nefopam: post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_fullStr Dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy with intravenous nefopam results in faster pain recovery than static compression cryotherapy with oral nefopam: post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy with intravenous nefopam results in faster pain recovery than static compression cryotherapy with oral nefopam: post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_short Dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy with intravenous nefopam results in faster pain recovery than static compression cryotherapy with oral nefopam: post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_sort dynamic intermittent compression cryotherapy with intravenous nefopam results in faster pain recovery than static compression cryotherapy with oral nefopam: post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37486444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00639-3
work_keys_str_mv AT moussamohamadk dynamicintermittentcompressioncryotherapywithintravenousnefopamresultsinfasterpainrecoverythanstaticcompressioncryotherapywithoralnefopampostanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT lefevrenicolas dynamicintermittentcompressioncryotherapywithintravenousnefopamresultsinfasterpainrecoverythanstaticcompressioncryotherapywithoralnefopampostanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT valentineugenie dynamicintermittentcompressioncryotherapywithintravenousnefopamresultsinfasterpainrecoverythanstaticcompressioncryotherapywithoralnefopampostanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT meyeralain dynamicintermittentcompressioncryotherapywithintravenousnefopamresultsinfasterpainrecoverythanstaticcompressioncryotherapywithoralnefopampostanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT grimaudolivier dynamicintermittentcompressioncryotherapywithintravenousnefopamresultsinfasterpainrecoverythanstaticcompressioncryotherapywithoralnefopampostanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT bohuyoan dynamicintermittentcompressioncryotherapywithintravenousnefopamresultsinfasterpainrecoverythanstaticcompressioncryotherapywithoralnefopampostanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT geromettaantoinne dynamicintermittentcompressioncryotherapywithintravenousnefopamresultsinfasterpainrecoverythanstaticcompressioncryotherapywithoralnefopampostanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT khiamifrederic dynamicintermittentcompressioncryotherapywithintravenousnefopamresultsinfasterpainrecoverythanstaticcompressioncryotherapywithoralnefopampostanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT hardyalexandre dynamicintermittentcompressioncryotherapywithintravenousnefopamresultsinfasterpainrecoverythanstaticcompressioncryotherapywithoralnefopampostanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction