Cargando…
Computational reactive–diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving Olaparib
Mathematical models based on partial differential equations (PDEs) can be exploited to handle clinical data with space/time dimensions, e.g. tumor growth challenged by neoadjuvant therapy. A model based on simplified assessment of tumor malignancy and pharmacodynamics efficiency was exercised to dis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38760-z |
_version_ | 1785077106111152128 |
---|---|
author | Schettini, Francesco De Bonis, Maria Valeria Strina, Carla Milani, Manuela Ziglioli, Nicoletta Aguggini, Sergio Ciliberto, Ignazio Azzini, Carlo Barbieri, Giuseppina Cervoni, Valeria Cappelletti, Maria Rosa Ferrero, Giuseppina Ungari, Marco Locci, Mariavittoria Paris, Ida Scambia, Giovanni Ruocco, Gianpaolo Generali, Daniele |
author_facet | Schettini, Francesco De Bonis, Maria Valeria Strina, Carla Milani, Manuela Ziglioli, Nicoletta Aguggini, Sergio Ciliberto, Ignazio Azzini, Carlo Barbieri, Giuseppina Cervoni, Valeria Cappelletti, Maria Rosa Ferrero, Giuseppina Ungari, Marco Locci, Mariavittoria Paris, Ida Scambia, Giovanni Ruocco, Gianpaolo Generali, Daniele |
author_sort | Schettini, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mathematical models based on partial differential equations (PDEs) can be exploited to handle clinical data with space/time dimensions, e.g. tumor growth challenged by neoadjuvant therapy. A model based on simplified assessment of tumor malignancy and pharmacodynamics efficiency was exercised to discover new metrics of patient prognosis in the OLTRE trial. We tested in a 17-patients cohort affected by early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with 3 weeks of olaparib, the capability of a PDEs-based reactive–diffusive model of tumor growth to efficiently predict the response to olaparib in terms of SUV(max) detected at (18)FDG-PET/CT scan, by using specific terms to characterize tumor diffusion and proliferation. Computations were performed with COMSOL Multiphysics. Driving parameters governing the mathematical model were selected with Pearson's correlations. Discrepancies between actual and computed SUV(max) values were assessed with Student’s t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. The correlation between post-olaparib true and computed SUV(max) was assessed with Pearson’s r and Spearman’s rho. After defining the proper mathematical assumptions, the nominal drug efficiency (ε(PD)) and tumor malignancy (r(c)) were computationally evaluated. The former parameter reflected the activity of olaparib on the tumor, while the latter represented the growth rate of metabolic activity as detected by SUV(max). ε(PD) was found to be directly dependent on basal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and Ki67% and was detectable through proper linear regression functions according to TILs values, while r(c) was represented by the baseline Ki67-to-TILs ratio. Predicted post-olaparib SUV*(max) did not significantly differ from original post-olaparib SUV(max) in the overall, gBRCA-mutant and gBRCA-wild-type subpopulations (p > 0.05 in all cases), showing strong positive correlation (r = 0.9 and rho = 0.9, p < 0.0001 both). A model of simplified tumor dynamics was exercised to effectively produce an upfront prediction of efficacy of 3-week neoadjuvant olaparib in terms of SUV(max). Prospective evaluation in independent cohorts and correlation of these outcomes with more recognized efficacy endpoints is now warranted for model confirmation and tailoring of escalated/de-escalated therapeutic strategies for early-TNBC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10366144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103661442023-07-26 Computational reactive–diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving Olaparib Schettini, Francesco De Bonis, Maria Valeria Strina, Carla Milani, Manuela Ziglioli, Nicoletta Aguggini, Sergio Ciliberto, Ignazio Azzini, Carlo Barbieri, Giuseppina Cervoni, Valeria Cappelletti, Maria Rosa Ferrero, Giuseppina Ungari, Marco Locci, Mariavittoria Paris, Ida Scambia, Giovanni Ruocco, Gianpaolo Generali, Daniele Sci Rep Article Mathematical models based on partial differential equations (PDEs) can be exploited to handle clinical data with space/time dimensions, e.g. tumor growth challenged by neoadjuvant therapy. A model based on simplified assessment of tumor malignancy and pharmacodynamics efficiency was exercised to discover new metrics of patient prognosis in the OLTRE trial. We tested in a 17-patients cohort affected by early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with 3 weeks of olaparib, the capability of a PDEs-based reactive–diffusive model of tumor growth to efficiently predict the response to olaparib in terms of SUV(max) detected at (18)FDG-PET/CT scan, by using specific terms to characterize tumor diffusion and proliferation. Computations were performed with COMSOL Multiphysics. Driving parameters governing the mathematical model were selected with Pearson's correlations. Discrepancies between actual and computed SUV(max) values were assessed with Student’s t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. The correlation between post-olaparib true and computed SUV(max) was assessed with Pearson’s r and Spearman’s rho. After defining the proper mathematical assumptions, the nominal drug efficiency (ε(PD)) and tumor malignancy (r(c)) were computationally evaluated. The former parameter reflected the activity of olaparib on the tumor, while the latter represented the growth rate of metabolic activity as detected by SUV(max). ε(PD) was found to be directly dependent on basal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and Ki67% and was detectable through proper linear regression functions according to TILs values, while r(c) was represented by the baseline Ki67-to-TILs ratio. Predicted post-olaparib SUV*(max) did not significantly differ from original post-olaparib SUV(max) in the overall, gBRCA-mutant and gBRCA-wild-type subpopulations (p > 0.05 in all cases), showing strong positive correlation (r = 0.9 and rho = 0.9, p < 0.0001 both). A model of simplified tumor dynamics was exercised to effectively produce an upfront prediction of efficacy of 3-week neoadjuvant olaparib in terms of SUV(max). Prospective evaluation in independent cohorts and correlation of these outcomes with more recognized efficacy endpoints is now warranted for model confirmation and tailoring of escalated/de-escalated therapeutic strategies for early-TNBC patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10366144/ /pubmed/37488154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38760-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Schettini, Francesco De Bonis, Maria Valeria Strina, Carla Milani, Manuela Ziglioli, Nicoletta Aguggini, Sergio Ciliberto, Ignazio Azzini, Carlo Barbieri, Giuseppina Cervoni, Valeria Cappelletti, Maria Rosa Ferrero, Giuseppina Ungari, Marco Locci, Mariavittoria Paris, Ida Scambia, Giovanni Ruocco, Gianpaolo Generali, Daniele Computational reactive–diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving Olaparib |
title | Computational reactive–diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving Olaparib |
title_full | Computational reactive–diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving Olaparib |
title_fullStr | Computational reactive–diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving Olaparib |
title_full_unstemmed | Computational reactive–diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving Olaparib |
title_short | Computational reactive–diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving Olaparib |
title_sort | computational reactive–diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving olaparib |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38760-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schettinifrancesco computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT debonismariavaleria computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT strinacarla computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT milanimanuela computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT zigliolinicoletta computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT agugginisergio computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT cilibertoignazio computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT azzinicarlo computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT barbierigiuseppina computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT cervonivaleria computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT cappellettimariarosa computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT ferrerogiuseppina computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT ungarimarco computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT loccimariavittoria computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT parisida computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT scambiagiovanni computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT ruoccogianpaolo computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib AT generalidaniele computationalreactivediffusivemodelingforstratificationandprognosisdeterminationofpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingolaparib |