Cargando…

Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been tested to modulate cognitive control or response inhibition using various electrode montages. However, electrode montages and current polarities have not been systematically compared when examining tDCS effects on cognitive control and response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holczer, Adrienn, Vékony, Teodóra, Klivényi, Péter, Must, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39161-y
_version_ 1785077111149559808
author Holczer, Adrienn
Vékony, Teodóra
Klivényi, Péter
Must, Anita
author_facet Holczer, Adrienn
Vékony, Teodóra
Klivényi, Péter
Must, Anita
author_sort Holczer, Adrienn
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been tested to modulate cognitive control or response inhibition using various electrode montages. However, electrode montages and current polarities have not been systematically compared when examining tDCS effects on cognitive control and response inhibition. In this randomized, sham-controlled study, 38 healthy volunteers were randomly grouped into receiving one session of sham, anodal, and cathodal each in an electrode montage that targeted either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or the fronto-medial (FM) region. Participants performed a combined flanker Go/No-Go task during stimulation. No effect of tDCS was found in the DLPFC and FM groups neither using anodal nor cathodal stimulation. No major adverse effects of tDCS were identified using either montage or stimulation type and the two groups did not differ in terms of the reported sensations. The present study suggests that single-session tDCS delivered in two two-electrode montages might not affect cognitive control or response inhibition, despite using widely popular stimulation parameters. This is in line with the heterogeneous findings in the field and calls for further systematic research to exclude less reliable methods from those with more pronounced effects, identify the determinants of responsiveness, and develop optimal ways to utilize this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10366169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103661692023-07-26 Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task Holczer, Adrienn Vékony, Teodóra Klivényi, Péter Must, Anita Sci Rep Article Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been tested to modulate cognitive control or response inhibition using various electrode montages. However, electrode montages and current polarities have not been systematically compared when examining tDCS effects on cognitive control and response inhibition. In this randomized, sham-controlled study, 38 healthy volunteers were randomly grouped into receiving one session of sham, anodal, and cathodal each in an electrode montage that targeted either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or the fronto-medial (FM) region. Participants performed a combined flanker Go/No-Go task during stimulation. No effect of tDCS was found in the DLPFC and FM groups neither using anodal nor cathodal stimulation. No major adverse effects of tDCS were identified using either montage or stimulation type and the two groups did not differ in terms of the reported sensations. The present study suggests that single-session tDCS delivered in two two-electrode montages might not affect cognitive control or response inhibition, despite using widely popular stimulation parameters. This is in line with the heterogeneous findings in the field and calls for further systematic research to exclude less reliable methods from those with more pronounced effects, identify the determinants of responsiveness, and develop optimal ways to utilize this technique. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10366169/ /pubmed/37488206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39161-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Holczer, Adrienn
Vékony, Teodóra
Klivényi, Péter
Must, Anita
Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task
title Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task
title_full Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task
title_fullStr Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task
title_full_unstemmed Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task
title_short Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task
title_sort frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker go/no-go task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39161-y
work_keys_str_mv AT holczeradrienn frontaltwoelectrodetranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationprotocolsmaynotaffectperformanceonacombinedflankergonogotask
AT vekonyteodora frontaltwoelectrodetranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationprotocolsmaynotaffectperformanceonacombinedflankergonogotask
AT klivenyipeter frontaltwoelectrodetranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationprotocolsmaynotaffectperformanceonacombinedflankergonogotask
AT mustanita frontaltwoelectrodetranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationprotocolsmaynotaffectperformanceonacombinedflankergonogotask