Cargando…

Manual action re-planning interferes with the maintenance process of working memory: an ERP investigation

The current study investigated the re-planning of the grasping movements, its functional interactions with working memory (WM), and underlying neurophysiological activity. Mainly, the current study investigated the movement re-planning interference with WM domains (verbal, visuospatial) and processe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunduz Can, Rumeysa, Schack, Thomas, Koester, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01741-4
_version_ 1785077133731692544
author Gunduz Can, Rumeysa
Schack, Thomas
Koester, Dirk
author_facet Gunduz Can, Rumeysa
Schack, Thomas
Koester, Dirk
author_sort Gunduz Can, Rumeysa
collection PubMed
description The current study investigated the re-planning of the grasping movements, its functional interactions with working memory (WM), and underlying neurophysiological activity. Mainly, the current study investigated the movement re-planning interference with WM domains (verbal, visuospatial) and processes (maintenance, retrieval). We combined a cognitive-motor dual-task paradigm with an EEG setting. Thirty-six participants completed the verbal and visuospatial versions of a WM task concurrently with a manual task which required performing a grasp-and-place movement by keeping the initial movement plan (prepared movement condition) or changing it for reversing the movement direction (re-planned movement condition). ERPs were extracted for the prepared and re-planned conditions in the verbal and visuospatial tasks separately during the maintenance and retrieval processes. ERP analyses showed that during the maintenance process of both the verbal and visuospatial tasks, the re-planned movements compared to the prepared movements generated a larger positive slow wave with a centroparietal maximum between 200 and 700. We interpreted this ERP effect as a P300 component for the re-planned movements. There was no ERP difference between the planned and re-planned movements during the retrieval process. Accordingly, we suggest that re-planning the grasp-and-place movement interfered at least with the maintenance of the verbal and visuospatial domains, resulting in the re-planning costs. More generally, the current study provides the initial neurophysiological investigations of the movement re-planning–WM interactions during grasping movements, and contributes to a better understanding of the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying manual action flexibility. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-022-01741-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10366281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103662812023-07-26 Manual action re-planning interferes with the maintenance process of working memory: an ERP investigation Gunduz Can, Rumeysa Schack, Thomas Koester, Dirk Psychol Res Original Article The current study investigated the re-planning of the grasping movements, its functional interactions with working memory (WM), and underlying neurophysiological activity. Mainly, the current study investigated the movement re-planning interference with WM domains (verbal, visuospatial) and processes (maintenance, retrieval). We combined a cognitive-motor dual-task paradigm with an EEG setting. Thirty-six participants completed the verbal and visuospatial versions of a WM task concurrently with a manual task which required performing a grasp-and-place movement by keeping the initial movement plan (prepared movement condition) or changing it for reversing the movement direction (re-planned movement condition). ERPs were extracted for the prepared and re-planned conditions in the verbal and visuospatial tasks separately during the maintenance and retrieval processes. ERP analyses showed that during the maintenance process of both the verbal and visuospatial tasks, the re-planned movements compared to the prepared movements generated a larger positive slow wave with a centroparietal maximum between 200 and 700. We interpreted this ERP effect as a P300 component for the re-planned movements. There was no ERP difference between the planned and re-planned movements during the retrieval process. Accordingly, we suggest that re-planning the grasp-and-place movement interfered at least with the maintenance of the verbal and visuospatial domains, resulting in the re-planning costs. More generally, the current study provides the initial neurophysiological investigations of the movement re-planning–WM interactions during grasping movements, and contributes to a better understanding of the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying manual action flexibility. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-022-01741-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10366281/ /pubmed/36434433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01741-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Gunduz Can, Rumeysa
Schack, Thomas
Koester, Dirk
Manual action re-planning interferes with the maintenance process of working memory: an ERP investigation
title Manual action re-planning interferes with the maintenance process of working memory: an ERP investigation
title_full Manual action re-planning interferes with the maintenance process of working memory: an ERP investigation
title_fullStr Manual action re-planning interferes with the maintenance process of working memory: an ERP investigation
title_full_unstemmed Manual action re-planning interferes with the maintenance process of working memory: an ERP investigation
title_short Manual action re-planning interferes with the maintenance process of working memory: an ERP investigation
title_sort manual action re-planning interferes with the maintenance process of working memory: an erp investigation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01741-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gunduzcanrumeysa manualactionreplanninginterfereswiththemaintenanceprocessofworkingmemoryanerpinvestigation
AT schackthomas manualactionreplanninginterfereswiththemaintenanceprocessofworkingmemoryanerpinvestigation
AT koesterdirk manualactionreplanninginterfereswiththemaintenanceprocessofworkingmemoryanerpinvestigation