Cargando…

Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility

Cognitive flexibility is frequently linked to resilience because of its important contribution to stress regulation. In this context, particularly affective flexibility, defined as the ability to flexibly attend and disengage from affective information, may play a significant role. In the present st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rademacher, Lena, Kraft, Dominik, Eckart, Cindy, Fiebach, Christian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36528692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01779-4
_version_ 1785077142387687424
author Rademacher, Lena
Kraft, Dominik
Eckart, Cindy
Fiebach, Christian J.
author_facet Rademacher, Lena
Kraft, Dominik
Eckart, Cindy
Fiebach, Christian J.
author_sort Rademacher, Lena
collection PubMed
description Cognitive flexibility is frequently linked to resilience because of its important contribution to stress regulation. In this context, particularly affective flexibility, defined as the ability to flexibly attend and disengage from affective information, may play a significant role. In the present study, the relationship of cognitive and affective flexibility and resilience was examined in 100 healthy participants. Resilience was measured with three self-report questionnaires, two defining resilience as a personality trait and one focusing on resilience as an outcome in the sense of stress coping abilities. Cognitive and affective flexibility were assessed in two experimental task switching paradigms with non-affective and affective materials and tasks, respectively. The cognitive flexibility paradigm additionally included measures of cognitive stability and spontaneous switching in ambiguous situations. In the affective flexibility paradigm, we explicitly considered the affective valence of the stimuli. Response time switch costs in the affective flexibility paradigm were significantly correlated to all three measures of resilience. The correlation was not specific for particular valences of the stimuli before or during switching. For cognitive (non-affective) flexibility, a significant correlation of response time switch costs was found with only one resilience measure. A regression analysis including both affective and cognitive switch costs as predictors of resilience indicated that only affective, but not cognitive switch costs, explained unique variance components. Furthermore, the experimental measures of cognitive stability and the rate of spontaneous switching in ambiguous situations did not correlate with resilience scores. These findings suggest that specifically the efficiency of flexibly switching between affective and non-affective information is related to resilience. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-022-01779-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10366320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103663202023-07-26 Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility Rademacher, Lena Kraft, Dominik Eckart, Cindy Fiebach, Christian J. Psychol Res Original Article Cognitive flexibility is frequently linked to resilience because of its important contribution to stress regulation. In this context, particularly affective flexibility, defined as the ability to flexibly attend and disengage from affective information, may play a significant role. In the present study, the relationship of cognitive and affective flexibility and resilience was examined in 100 healthy participants. Resilience was measured with three self-report questionnaires, two defining resilience as a personality trait and one focusing on resilience as an outcome in the sense of stress coping abilities. Cognitive and affective flexibility were assessed in two experimental task switching paradigms with non-affective and affective materials and tasks, respectively. The cognitive flexibility paradigm additionally included measures of cognitive stability and spontaneous switching in ambiguous situations. In the affective flexibility paradigm, we explicitly considered the affective valence of the stimuli. Response time switch costs in the affective flexibility paradigm were significantly correlated to all three measures of resilience. The correlation was not specific for particular valences of the stimuli before or during switching. For cognitive (non-affective) flexibility, a significant correlation of response time switch costs was found with only one resilience measure. A regression analysis including both affective and cognitive switch costs as predictors of resilience indicated that only affective, but not cognitive switch costs, explained unique variance components. Furthermore, the experimental measures of cognitive stability and the rate of spontaneous switching in ambiguous situations did not correlate with resilience scores. These findings suggest that specifically the efficiency of flexibly switching between affective and non-affective information is related to resilience. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-022-01779-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10366320/ /pubmed/36528692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01779-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Rademacher, Lena
Kraft, Dominik
Eckart, Cindy
Fiebach, Christian J.
Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility
title Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility
title_full Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility
title_fullStr Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility
title_short Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility
title_sort individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36528692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01779-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rademacherlena individualdifferencesinresiliencetostressareassociatedwithaffectiveflexibility
AT kraftdominik individualdifferencesinresiliencetostressareassociatedwithaffectiveflexibility
AT eckartcindy individualdifferencesinresiliencetostressareassociatedwithaffectiveflexibility
AT fiebachchristianj individualdifferencesinresiliencetostressareassociatedwithaffectiveflexibility