Cargando…

Development and validation of a Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire: the MAUQ

BACKGROUND: Different questionnaires assess self-reported medication adherence and others quantify aspects of patients attitudes towards medication, but not together in a single instrument. Gathering these two aspects in a single instrument could reduce patients survey burden. AIM: The aim of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabral, Ana C., Lavrador, Marta, Castel-Branco, Margarida, Figueiredo, Isabel Vitória, Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37329432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01612-x
_version_ 1785077142635151360
author Cabral, Ana C.
Lavrador, Marta
Castel-Branco, Margarida
Figueiredo, Isabel Vitória
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
author_facet Cabral, Ana C.
Lavrador, Marta
Castel-Branco, Margarida
Figueiredo, Isabel Vitória
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
author_sort Cabral, Ana C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Different questionnaires assess self-reported medication adherence and others quantify aspects of patients attitudes towards medication, but not together in a single instrument. Gathering these two aspects in a single instrument could reduce patients survey burden. AIM: The aim of this study was to develop the Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire (MAUQ) using the Maastricht Utrecht Adherence in Hypertension short version (MUAH-16) factorial structure as the hypothesized model. METHOD: A multistep process started with the modification of the MUAH-16 to obtain the MAUQ. Patients using at least one antihypertensive medicine were recruited. The two questionnaires, the MUAH-16 and MAUQ, were applied. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed using the initial MUAH-16 s-order 4-factor model. An additional bifactor model with four uncorrelated factors and an overall score was tested. The comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) with confidence intervals (CIs), and standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) were used to assess both models. RESULTS: A sample of 300 hypertensive patients completed the instruments. The CFA with the second-order 4-factor solution resulted in similar results for the MUAH-16 and MAUQ: CFIs of 0.934 and 0.930, RMSEAs of 0.043 [CI 0.030–0.056] and 0.045 [CI 0.031–0.057] and SRMRs of 0.060 and 0.061, respectively. The CFA with the bifactor model showed slightly better results for both the MUAH-16 and MAUQ: CFIs of 0.974 and 0.976, RMSEAs of 0.030 [CI 0.005–0.046] and 0.028 [CI 0.001–0.044], and SRMRs of 0.043 and 0.044, respectively. CONCLUSION: CFA demonstrated that the MAUQ presented a better fit to both models than the MUAH-16, obtaining a robust universal free instrument to assess medicine-taking behaviour and four medicine beliefs components. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-023-01612-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10366321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103663212023-07-26 Development and validation of a Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire: the MAUQ Cabral, Ana C. Lavrador, Marta Castel-Branco, Margarida Figueiredo, Isabel Vitória Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando Int J Clin Pharm Research Article BACKGROUND: Different questionnaires assess self-reported medication adherence and others quantify aspects of patients attitudes towards medication, but not together in a single instrument. Gathering these two aspects in a single instrument could reduce patients survey burden. AIM: The aim of this study was to develop the Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire (MAUQ) using the Maastricht Utrecht Adherence in Hypertension short version (MUAH-16) factorial structure as the hypothesized model. METHOD: A multistep process started with the modification of the MUAH-16 to obtain the MAUQ. Patients using at least one antihypertensive medicine were recruited. The two questionnaires, the MUAH-16 and MAUQ, were applied. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed using the initial MUAH-16 s-order 4-factor model. An additional bifactor model with four uncorrelated factors and an overall score was tested. The comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) with confidence intervals (CIs), and standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) were used to assess both models. RESULTS: A sample of 300 hypertensive patients completed the instruments. The CFA with the second-order 4-factor solution resulted in similar results for the MUAH-16 and MAUQ: CFIs of 0.934 and 0.930, RMSEAs of 0.043 [CI 0.030–0.056] and 0.045 [CI 0.031–0.057] and SRMRs of 0.060 and 0.061, respectively. The CFA with the bifactor model showed slightly better results for both the MUAH-16 and MAUQ: CFIs of 0.974 and 0.976, RMSEAs of 0.030 [CI 0.005–0.046] and 0.028 [CI 0.001–0.044], and SRMRs of 0.043 and 0.044, respectively. CONCLUSION: CFA demonstrated that the MAUQ presented a better fit to both models than the MUAH-16, obtaining a robust universal free instrument to assess medicine-taking behaviour and four medicine beliefs components. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-023-01612-x. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10366321/ /pubmed/37329432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01612-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Cabral, Ana C.
Lavrador, Marta
Castel-Branco, Margarida
Figueiredo, Isabel Vitória
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Development and validation of a Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire: the MAUQ
title Development and validation of a Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire: the MAUQ
title_full Development and validation of a Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire: the MAUQ
title_fullStr Development and validation of a Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire: the MAUQ
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire: the MAUQ
title_short Development and validation of a Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire: the MAUQ
title_sort development and validation of a medication adherence universal questionnaire: the mauq
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37329432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01612-x
work_keys_str_mv AT cabralanac developmentandvalidationofamedicationadherenceuniversalquestionnairethemauq
AT lavradormarta developmentandvalidationofamedicationadherenceuniversalquestionnairethemauq
AT castelbrancomargarida developmentandvalidationofamedicationadherenceuniversalquestionnairethemauq
AT figueiredoisabelvitoria developmentandvalidationofamedicationadherenceuniversalquestionnairethemauq
AT fernandezllimosfernando developmentandvalidationofamedicationadherenceuniversalquestionnairethemauq