Cargando…
Effects of sperm processing techniques on IVF pregnancy rates: a mini-review
Many factors associated with assisted reproductive technologies significantly influence the success of pregnancy after in vitro fertilization (IVF) either directly or indirectly. These factors include sperm processing techniques, egg retrieval, intrauterine artificial insemination, intracytoplasmic...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37497119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334941231188656 |
_version_ | 1785077145746276352 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Cong Sun, Lanming Zhao, Pin |
author_facet | Zhao, Cong Sun, Lanming Zhao, Pin |
author_sort | Zhao, Cong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many factors associated with assisted reproductive technologies significantly influence the success of pregnancy after in vitro fertilization (IVF) either directly or indirectly. These factors include sperm processing techniques, egg retrieval, intrauterine artificial insemination, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer. Among these technologies, sperm quality is one of the most critical factors for a successful IVF pregnancy. The method used for sperm processing plays a crucial role in determining the quality of sperm. Several widely used sorting techniques, such as conventional swim-up, density gradient centrifugation, magnetic activated cell sorting, and hyaluronic acid, have been extensively compared in various studies. Previous studies have shown that each sperm processing method causes varying degrees of sperm damage, particularly in sperm motility, concentration, morphological features, viability, and DNA integrity. However, sperm processing techniques have been developed slowly, and the impact of these methods on pregnancy rates is still unclear. Further exploration is needed. In this review, we aim to compare the results of different sperm processing techniques concerning sperm quality and IVF pregnancy rates. We will also discuss possible clinical approaches, such as microfluidics and integrated approaches, for testing and improving sperm quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10366343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103663432023-07-26 Effects of sperm processing techniques on IVF pregnancy rates: a mini-review Zhao, Cong Sun, Lanming Zhao, Pin Ther Adv Reprod Health Review Many factors associated with assisted reproductive technologies significantly influence the success of pregnancy after in vitro fertilization (IVF) either directly or indirectly. These factors include sperm processing techniques, egg retrieval, intrauterine artificial insemination, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer. Among these technologies, sperm quality is one of the most critical factors for a successful IVF pregnancy. The method used for sperm processing plays a crucial role in determining the quality of sperm. Several widely used sorting techniques, such as conventional swim-up, density gradient centrifugation, magnetic activated cell sorting, and hyaluronic acid, have been extensively compared in various studies. Previous studies have shown that each sperm processing method causes varying degrees of sperm damage, particularly in sperm motility, concentration, morphological features, viability, and DNA integrity. However, sperm processing techniques have been developed slowly, and the impact of these methods on pregnancy rates is still unclear. Further exploration is needed. In this review, we aim to compare the results of different sperm processing techniques concerning sperm quality and IVF pregnancy rates. We will also discuss possible clinical approaches, such as microfluidics and integrated approaches, for testing and improving sperm quality. SAGE Publications 2023-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10366343/ /pubmed/37497119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334941231188656 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Zhao, Cong Sun, Lanming Zhao, Pin Effects of sperm processing techniques on IVF pregnancy rates: a mini-review |
title | Effects of sperm processing techniques on IVF pregnancy rates: a mini-review |
title_full | Effects of sperm processing techniques on IVF pregnancy rates: a mini-review |
title_fullStr | Effects of sperm processing techniques on IVF pregnancy rates: a mini-review |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of sperm processing techniques on IVF pregnancy rates: a mini-review |
title_short | Effects of sperm processing techniques on IVF pregnancy rates: a mini-review |
title_sort | effects of sperm processing techniques on ivf pregnancy rates: a mini-review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37497119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334941231188656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaocong effectsofspermprocessingtechniquesonivfpregnancyratesaminireview AT sunlanming effectsofspermprocessingtechniquesonivfpregnancyratesaminireview AT zhaopin effectsofspermprocessingtechniquesonivfpregnancyratesaminireview |