Cargando…

Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients

For the last two years, the SARS-CoV-2 virus spread all around the world and led to the COVID-19 pandemic. The need of methods to control the pandemic and to propose rapid and efficient diagnostic tools has emerged. In this perspective, SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) have been devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prazuck, Thierry, Serreau, Raphael, Theillay, Aurelie, Pallay, Sandra, Pires-Roteia, Daniela, Prazuck, Fanny, Lesne, Fabien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18088
_version_ 1785077163623448576
author Prazuck, Thierry
Serreau, Raphael
Theillay, Aurelie
Pallay, Sandra
Pires-Roteia, Daniela
Prazuck, Fanny
Lesne, Fabien
author_facet Prazuck, Thierry
Serreau, Raphael
Theillay, Aurelie
Pallay, Sandra
Pires-Roteia, Daniela
Prazuck, Fanny
Lesne, Fabien
author_sort Prazuck, Thierry
collection PubMed
description For the last two years, the SARS-CoV-2 virus spread all around the world and led to the COVID-19 pandemic. The need of methods to control the pandemic and to propose rapid and efficient diagnostic tools has emerged. In this perspective, SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) have been developed. We performed a retrospective study on 638 collected nasopharyngeal samples used for reference RT-qPCR diagnosis to compare the AQ + COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec (AQ + InTec test) performance with other commercially available RADT (Abbott Panbio, Roche SDBiosensor and Siemens Clinitest). We analysed the sensitivity and specificity of the different tests and showed a better overall performance of the AQ + InTec test, which was confirmed on the SARS-Cov-2 Omicron variant. We then conducted a prospective study on 844patients, to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the AQ + InTec test on nasal and nasopharyngeal samples in a point of care setting. We showed that sensitivity and specificity reach acceptable criteria (respectively 94.4% and 99.6% on nasal samples) regarding the official recommendations of the MDCG 2021-21 in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Overall, the results of these two studies confirm that the AQ + InTec test is a valuable tool for testing in a pandemic context with a high proportion of asymptomatic patients who are potential carriers for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and is performant on the most current circulating variant Omicron.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10366418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103664182023-07-26 Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients Prazuck, Thierry Serreau, Raphael Theillay, Aurelie Pallay, Sandra Pires-Roteia, Daniela Prazuck, Fanny Lesne, Fabien Heliyon Research Article For the last two years, the SARS-CoV-2 virus spread all around the world and led to the COVID-19 pandemic. The need of methods to control the pandemic and to propose rapid and efficient diagnostic tools has emerged. In this perspective, SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) have been developed. We performed a retrospective study on 638 collected nasopharyngeal samples used for reference RT-qPCR diagnosis to compare the AQ + COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec (AQ + InTec test) performance with other commercially available RADT (Abbott Panbio, Roche SDBiosensor and Siemens Clinitest). We analysed the sensitivity and specificity of the different tests and showed a better overall performance of the AQ + InTec test, which was confirmed on the SARS-Cov-2 Omicron variant. We then conducted a prospective study on 844patients, to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the AQ + InTec test on nasal and nasopharyngeal samples in a point of care setting. We showed that sensitivity and specificity reach acceptable criteria (respectively 94.4% and 99.6% on nasal samples) regarding the official recommendations of the MDCG 2021-21 in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Overall, the results of these two studies confirm that the AQ + InTec test is a valuable tool for testing in a pandemic context with a high proportion of asymptomatic patients who are potential carriers for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and is performant on the most current circulating variant Omicron. Elsevier 2023-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10366418/ /pubmed/37496893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18088 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Prazuck, Thierry
Serreau, Raphael
Theillay, Aurelie
Pallay, Sandra
Pires-Roteia, Daniela
Prazuck, Fanny
Lesne, Fabien
Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients
title Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients
title_full Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients
title_fullStr Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients
title_short Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients
title_sort retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the sars-cov-2 “aq+ covid-19 ag rapid test” from intec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18088
work_keys_str_mv AT prazuckthierry retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients
AT serreauraphael retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients
AT theillayaurelie retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients
AT pallaysandra retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients
AT piresroteiadaniela retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients
AT prazuckfanny retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients
AT lesnefabien retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients