Cargando…
Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients
For the last two years, the SARS-CoV-2 virus spread all around the world and led to the COVID-19 pandemic. The need of methods to control the pandemic and to propose rapid and efficient diagnostic tools has emerged. In this perspective, SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) have been devel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18088 |
_version_ | 1785077163623448576 |
---|---|
author | Prazuck, Thierry Serreau, Raphael Theillay, Aurelie Pallay, Sandra Pires-Roteia, Daniela Prazuck, Fanny Lesne, Fabien |
author_facet | Prazuck, Thierry Serreau, Raphael Theillay, Aurelie Pallay, Sandra Pires-Roteia, Daniela Prazuck, Fanny Lesne, Fabien |
author_sort | Prazuck, Thierry |
collection | PubMed |
description | For the last two years, the SARS-CoV-2 virus spread all around the world and led to the COVID-19 pandemic. The need of methods to control the pandemic and to propose rapid and efficient diagnostic tools has emerged. In this perspective, SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) have been developed. We performed a retrospective study on 638 collected nasopharyngeal samples used for reference RT-qPCR diagnosis to compare the AQ + COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec (AQ + InTec test) performance with other commercially available RADT (Abbott Panbio, Roche SDBiosensor and Siemens Clinitest). We analysed the sensitivity and specificity of the different tests and showed a better overall performance of the AQ + InTec test, which was confirmed on the SARS-Cov-2 Omicron variant. We then conducted a prospective study on 844patients, to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the AQ + InTec test on nasal and nasopharyngeal samples in a point of care setting. We showed that sensitivity and specificity reach acceptable criteria (respectively 94.4% and 99.6% on nasal samples) regarding the official recommendations of the MDCG 2021-21 in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Overall, the results of these two studies confirm that the AQ + InTec test is a valuable tool for testing in a pandemic context with a high proportion of asymptomatic patients who are potential carriers for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and is performant on the most current circulating variant Omicron. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10366418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103664182023-07-26 Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients Prazuck, Thierry Serreau, Raphael Theillay, Aurelie Pallay, Sandra Pires-Roteia, Daniela Prazuck, Fanny Lesne, Fabien Heliyon Research Article For the last two years, the SARS-CoV-2 virus spread all around the world and led to the COVID-19 pandemic. The need of methods to control the pandemic and to propose rapid and efficient diagnostic tools has emerged. In this perspective, SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) have been developed. We performed a retrospective study on 638 collected nasopharyngeal samples used for reference RT-qPCR diagnosis to compare the AQ + COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec (AQ + InTec test) performance with other commercially available RADT (Abbott Panbio, Roche SDBiosensor and Siemens Clinitest). We analysed the sensitivity and specificity of the different tests and showed a better overall performance of the AQ + InTec test, which was confirmed on the SARS-Cov-2 Omicron variant. We then conducted a prospective study on 844patients, to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the AQ + InTec test on nasal and nasopharyngeal samples in a point of care setting. We showed that sensitivity and specificity reach acceptable criteria (respectively 94.4% and 99.6% on nasal samples) regarding the official recommendations of the MDCG 2021-21 in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Overall, the results of these two studies confirm that the AQ + InTec test is a valuable tool for testing in a pandemic context with a high proportion of asymptomatic patients who are potential carriers for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and is performant on the most current circulating variant Omicron. Elsevier 2023-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10366418/ /pubmed/37496893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18088 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Prazuck, Thierry Serreau, Raphael Theillay, Aurelie Pallay, Sandra Pires-Roteia, Daniela Prazuck, Fanny Lesne, Fabien Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients |
title | Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients |
title_full | Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients |
title_fullStr | Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients |
title_short | Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients |
title_sort | retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the sars-cov-2 “aq+ covid-19 ag rapid test” from intec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prazuckthierry retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients AT serreauraphael retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients AT theillayaurelie retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients AT pallaysandra retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients AT piresroteiadaniela retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients AT prazuckfanny retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients AT lesnefabien retrospectiveandprospectivestudiesevaluatingtheperformanceofthesarscov2aqcovid19agrapidtestfrominteconsymptomaticandnonsymptomaticpatients |