Cargando…

Proposed methods for evaluating efforts made by governments to prevent and mitigate corporate influence and conflicts of interest in public health policy

Background: There is evidence that corporations try to delay, weaken, and avoid the adoption of measures that would protect and improve population health. This is particularly true and problematic for health harming industries, such as those producing ultra-processed foods, alcohol, and cigarettes....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mialon, Mélissa, Bertscher, Adam, Bero, Lisa, Vandevijvere, Stefanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496747
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13553.2
_version_ 1785077191470481408
author Mialon, Mélissa
Bertscher, Adam
Bero, Lisa
Vandevijvere, Stefanie
author_facet Mialon, Mélissa
Bertscher, Adam
Bero, Lisa
Vandevijvere, Stefanie
author_sort Mialon, Mélissa
collection PubMed
description Background: There is evidence that corporations try to delay, weaken, and avoid the adoption of measures that would protect and improve population health. This is particularly true and problematic for health harming industries, such as those producing ultra-processed foods, alcohol, and cigarettes. Financial conflicts of interest (COI) are also problematic in policy-making because they may compromise decision-makers’ loyalty and independent judgment. Public opinion is in favor of preventing and mitigating that influence from corporations and COI on public health policy. A scoping review recently identified twenty-three mechanisms that could be adopted with that purpose and which principally cover: i) transparency and disclosure; ii) identification, monitoring, and education; iii) management; iv) prohibition of interactions with the industry and/or COI. There is, however, limited knowledge on the adoption of such mechanisms by governments. We therefore propose new methods for evaluating that progress at the country level. Methods and expected results: The proposed evaluation comprises five steps: 1) Gathering information about the national context; 2) Gathering evidence on the implementation of mechanisms by national governments; 3) Verification of step 2 by government officials and policy experts and local public health experts; 4) Identification and prioritization of actions in a workshop; 5) Supporting the translation of findings into policy actions. Conclusions: The evaluation of progress made by governments in their implementation of mechanisms for preventing and mitigating the influence of corporations and COI in public health policy could help countries systematize their efforts, benchmark their progress internationally, and give perspective on particular weaknesses, approaches, and investment gaps needed for change. We will implement and validate our methods in Ireland, as a first case-study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10366553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103665532023-07-26 Proposed methods for evaluating efforts made by governments to prevent and mitigate corporate influence and conflicts of interest in public health policy Mialon, Mélissa Bertscher, Adam Bero, Lisa Vandevijvere, Stefanie HRB Open Res Method Article Background: There is evidence that corporations try to delay, weaken, and avoid the adoption of measures that would protect and improve population health. This is particularly true and problematic for health harming industries, such as those producing ultra-processed foods, alcohol, and cigarettes. Financial conflicts of interest (COI) are also problematic in policy-making because they may compromise decision-makers’ loyalty and independent judgment. Public opinion is in favor of preventing and mitigating that influence from corporations and COI on public health policy. A scoping review recently identified twenty-three mechanisms that could be adopted with that purpose and which principally cover: i) transparency and disclosure; ii) identification, monitoring, and education; iii) management; iv) prohibition of interactions with the industry and/or COI. There is, however, limited knowledge on the adoption of such mechanisms by governments. We therefore propose new methods for evaluating that progress at the country level. Methods and expected results: The proposed evaluation comprises five steps: 1) Gathering information about the national context; 2) Gathering evidence on the implementation of mechanisms by national governments; 3) Verification of step 2 by government officials and policy experts and local public health experts; 4) Identification and prioritization of actions in a workshop; 5) Supporting the translation of findings into policy actions. Conclusions: The evaluation of progress made by governments in their implementation of mechanisms for preventing and mitigating the influence of corporations and COI in public health policy could help countries systematize their efforts, benchmark their progress internationally, and give perspective on particular weaknesses, approaches, and investment gaps needed for change. We will implement and validate our methods in Ireland, as a first case-study. F1000 Research Limited 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10366553/ /pubmed/37496747 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13553.2 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Mialon M et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Method Article
Mialon, Mélissa
Bertscher, Adam
Bero, Lisa
Vandevijvere, Stefanie
Proposed methods for evaluating efforts made by governments to prevent and mitigate corporate influence and conflicts of interest in public health policy
title Proposed methods for evaluating efforts made by governments to prevent and mitigate corporate influence and conflicts of interest in public health policy
title_full Proposed methods for evaluating efforts made by governments to prevent and mitigate corporate influence and conflicts of interest in public health policy
title_fullStr Proposed methods for evaluating efforts made by governments to prevent and mitigate corporate influence and conflicts of interest in public health policy
title_full_unstemmed Proposed methods for evaluating efforts made by governments to prevent and mitigate corporate influence and conflicts of interest in public health policy
title_short Proposed methods for evaluating efforts made by governments to prevent and mitigate corporate influence and conflicts of interest in public health policy
title_sort proposed methods for evaluating efforts made by governments to prevent and mitigate corporate influence and conflicts of interest in public health policy
topic Method Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496747
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13553.2
work_keys_str_mv AT mialonmelissa proposedmethodsforevaluatingeffortsmadebygovernmentstopreventandmitigatecorporateinfluenceandconflictsofinterestinpublichealthpolicy
AT bertscheradam proposedmethodsforevaluatingeffortsmadebygovernmentstopreventandmitigatecorporateinfluenceandconflictsofinterestinpublichealthpolicy
AT berolisa proposedmethodsforevaluatingeffortsmadebygovernmentstopreventandmitigatecorporateinfluenceandconflictsofinterestinpublichealthpolicy
AT vandevijverestefanie proposedmethodsforevaluatingeffortsmadebygovernmentstopreventandmitigatecorporateinfluenceandconflictsofinterestinpublichealthpolicy