Cargando…

Accuracy of Intraarticular Injections: Blind vs. Image Guided Techniques—A Review of Literature

Intra-articular injections are widely used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes of joint pathologies throughout the body. These injections can be performed blind by utilizing anatomical landmarks or with the use of imaging modalities to directly visualize the joint space during injections. This r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Prasenjit, Smith, Matthew, Hasan, Khalid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37489306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8030093
_version_ 1785077228291227648
author Saha, Prasenjit
Smith, Matthew
Hasan, Khalid
author_facet Saha, Prasenjit
Smith, Matthew
Hasan, Khalid
author_sort Saha, Prasenjit
collection PubMed
description Intra-articular injections are widely used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes of joint pathologies throughout the body. These injections can be performed blind by utilizing anatomical landmarks or with the use of imaging modalities to directly visualize the joint space during injections. This review of the literature aims to comprehensively identify differences in the accuracy of intra-articular injections via palpation vs. image guidance in the most commonly injected joints in the upper and lower extremities. To our knowledge, there are no such comprehensive reviews available. A narrative literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies focusing on the accuracy of blind or image-guided intra-articular injections for each joint. A total of 75 articles was included in this review, with blind and image-guided strategies being discussed for the most commonly injected joints of the upper and lower extremities. Varying ranges of accuracy with blind and image-guided modalities were found throughout the literature, though an improvement in accuracy was seen in nearly all joints when using image guidance. Differences are pronounced, particularly in deep joints such as the hip or in the small joints such as those in the hand or foot. Image guidance is a useful adjunct for most intra-articular injections, if available. Though there is an increase in accuracy in nearly all joints, minor differences in accuracy seen in large, easily accessed joints, such as the knee, may not warrant image guidance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10366715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103667152023-07-26 Accuracy of Intraarticular Injections: Blind vs. Image Guided Techniques—A Review of Literature Saha, Prasenjit Smith, Matthew Hasan, Khalid J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Review Intra-articular injections are widely used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes of joint pathologies throughout the body. These injections can be performed blind by utilizing anatomical landmarks or with the use of imaging modalities to directly visualize the joint space during injections. This review of the literature aims to comprehensively identify differences in the accuracy of intra-articular injections via palpation vs. image guidance in the most commonly injected joints in the upper and lower extremities. To our knowledge, there are no such comprehensive reviews available. A narrative literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies focusing on the accuracy of blind or image-guided intra-articular injections for each joint. A total of 75 articles was included in this review, with blind and image-guided strategies being discussed for the most commonly injected joints of the upper and lower extremities. Varying ranges of accuracy with blind and image-guided modalities were found throughout the literature, though an improvement in accuracy was seen in nearly all joints when using image guidance. Differences are pronounced, particularly in deep joints such as the hip or in the small joints such as those in the hand or foot. Image guidance is a useful adjunct for most intra-articular injections, if available. Though there is an increase in accuracy in nearly all joints, minor differences in accuracy seen in large, easily accessed joints, such as the knee, may not warrant image guidance. MDPI 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10366715/ /pubmed/37489306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8030093 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Saha, Prasenjit
Smith, Matthew
Hasan, Khalid
Accuracy of Intraarticular Injections: Blind vs. Image Guided Techniques—A Review of Literature
title Accuracy of Intraarticular Injections: Blind vs. Image Guided Techniques—A Review of Literature
title_full Accuracy of Intraarticular Injections: Blind vs. Image Guided Techniques—A Review of Literature
title_fullStr Accuracy of Intraarticular Injections: Blind vs. Image Guided Techniques—A Review of Literature
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Intraarticular Injections: Blind vs. Image Guided Techniques—A Review of Literature
title_short Accuracy of Intraarticular Injections: Blind vs. Image Guided Techniques—A Review of Literature
title_sort accuracy of intraarticular injections: blind vs. image guided techniques—a review of literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37489306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8030093
work_keys_str_mv AT sahaprasenjit accuracyofintraarticularinjectionsblindvsimageguidedtechniquesareviewofliterature
AT smithmatthew accuracyofintraarticularinjectionsblindvsimageguidedtechniquesareviewofliterature
AT hasankhalid accuracyofintraarticularinjectionsblindvsimageguidedtechniquesareviewofliterature